Trump Now Gets a $1.8BN Taxpayer Slush Fund to Pay Others

[Alweysrite!]

Not so. Him stealing data in his 7th year working for them is not evidence of improper vetting. And of course there was no evidence of improper vetting introduced in court because Trump couldn't take his case to court.

The IRS is responsible for the theft of people's tax returns they were in charge of

 

[Alweysrite!]

Never proven in court.

Trump received a settlement. Doesn't matter, it's over. IRS should be more careful with people's information.

 

[Political-Junkie]

How could there not be negligence if the IRS has your tax returns and they get leaked? Be specific please

Because someone steals them after working for them for 6 years. Thst's like you get married, you're married for 6 years to a wife who's earned your trust, but then one day she steals your Rolex, and I blame you for being negligent.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The IRS had them. That's who you send them to. Not John Little John

The IRS had them until Littlejohn stole them and then leaked them.

 

[Political-Junkie]

It was all political against Trump. Now it's political against you LOL. Hopefully Trump puts a stop to all of it by the time it's over.

You're entitled to your opinion as wrong as it is. There was probable cause that Trump violated the law by retaining possession of classified materials and not returning them all when ordered to. That makes it legitimate to try him in court.

There was probable cause that Trump tried to send fake electors to Congress to fraudulently flip the election he lost. That makes it legitimate to try him in court.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Did the Democrats benefit from it?

Irrelevant since Democrats could benefit from it without manufacturing it, which was your claim you now obviously can't prove.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The IRS is responsible for the theft of people's tax returns they were in charge of

Never proven in court.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Trump received a settlement. Doesn't matter, it's over. IRS should be more careful with people's information.

You think it's over? There's currently a stay on dispersing the funds as a court is now trying to determine if Trump committed fraud.

 

[Care4all]

Trump received a settlement. Doesn't matter, it's over. IRS should be more careful with people's information.

Blanche, under the law, can settle a case that the Doj was losing in the court suit.

Trump dropped his suit in the court before determining any of that.....
Blanche illegally settled before he legally could.

 

[struth]

Not so. Him stealing data in his 7th year working for them is not evidence of improper vetting. And of course there was no evidence of improper vetting introduced in court because Trump couldn't take his case to court.

Leaking information isn’t evidence he was improperly hired? Ooooooh

 

[Care4all]

How could there not be negligence if the IRS has your tax returns and they get leaked? Be specific please

The IRS was the VICTIM of the hacker.....