trump lawyers in Colorado file that he never took an oath to suppott the Constitution

[JimH52]

'Treacherous criminal': Lawmaker slams Trump over claim of never taking oath to support Constitution

In a November 27 legal filing submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court, attorneys representing former President Donald Trump made a unique argument in justifying that the US Constitution's insurrection clause doesn't apply to their client.The clause, which is in Section Three of the 14th...

www.alternet.org

I read this and could not belive what I read. His attorneys actually filed that trump never took an oath to support the Constution of the United States. They are bigger liars than trump
.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There's no oath to support the constitution. It's a very technical use of semantics. However, when accused of not supporting the constitution it is appropriate to point out that there is no such oath.

 

[Rawley]

'Treacherous criminal': Lawmaker slams Trump over claim of never taking oath to support Constitution

In a November 27 legal filing submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court, attorneys representing former President Donald Trump made a unique argument in justifying that the US Constitution's insurrection clause doesn't apply to their client.The clause, which is in Section Three of the 14th...

www.alternet.org

I read this and could not belive what I read. His attorneys actually filed that trump never took an oath to support the Constution of the United States. They are bigger liars than trump
.

You would think that after all these years you would have learned not to rely on the garbage put out by alternet or rawstory. Oh well.

 

[beautress]

'Treacherous criminal': Lawmaker slams Trump over claim of never taking oath to support Constitution

In a November 27 legal filing submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court, attorneys representing former President Donald Trump made a unique argument in justifying that the US Constitution's insurrection clause doesn't apply to their client.The clause, which is in Section Three of the 14th...

www.alternet.org

I read this and could not belive what I read. His attorneys actually filed that trump never took an oath to support the Constution of the United States. They are bigger liars than trump
.

That is a big lie, and Justice John Roberts administered his Oath of Office as below:

​

 

[toobfreak]

trump lawyers in Colorado file that he never took an oath to suppott the Constitution​

Easy. Just provide us with the video where Trump took the oath to support the Constitution.

Do you think Biden is supporting the Constitution?

 

[toobfreak]

That is a big lie, and Justice John Roberts administered his Oath of Office as below

Was that Nancy I saw in the background swallowing the cyanide capsule?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Easy. Just provide us with the video where Trump took the oath to support the Constitution.

Do you think Biden is supporting the Constitution?

If protecting America is part of what he agreed to, he has FAILED. He has let in all the illegals and not protecting our Border.

 

[beautress]

'Treacherous criminal': Lawmaker slams Trump over claim of never taking oath to support Constitution

In a November 27 legal filing submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court, attorneys representing former President Donald Trump made a unique argument in justifying that the US Constitution's insurrection clause doesn't apply to their client.The clause, which is in Section Three of the 14th...

www.alternet.org

I read this and could not belive what I read. His attorneys actually filed that trump never took an oath to support the Constution of the United States. They are bigger liars than trump
.

Don't feel bad, Jim. It's just another false narrative the deep state finds is useful for the minute, even if untrue.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

'Treacherous criminal': Lawmaker slams Trump over claim of never taking oath to support Constitution

In a November 27 legal filing submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court, attorneys representing former President Donald Trump made a unique argument in justifying that the US Constitution's insurrection clause doesn't apply to their client.The clause, which is in Section Three of the 14th...

www.alternet.org

I read this and could not belive what I read. His attorneys actually filed that trump never took an oath to support the Constution of the United States. They are bigger liars than trump
.

.




I knew someone who thought alternet.org was worth reading.

Notice, I used the past tense.




.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If protecting America is part of what he agreed to, he has FAILED. He has let in all the illegals and not protecting our Border.

Biden has violated section 4 article IV of the Constitution l

 

[Rigby5]

Who cares what oath he took or what the oath says.
Clearly anyone can be seditious.
But in my opinion, sedition can never be illegal in a republic.