Trump Keeps Snowflakes Foaming At The Mouth With Doses Of REALITY

[Rustic]

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

And more good news admiral ,,Time is on our side ,We have 3 years to get the corrupt pos And more good news We might keep getting on his case even after he leaves Sorta like your AH's did with Hillary for 30 years

Hildabeast is a loopy kunt, and deserves to eat shit the rest of her life...

 

[eddiew37]

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

And more good news admiral ,,Time is on our side ,We have 3 years to get the corrupt pos And more good news We might keep getting on his case even after he leaves Sorta like your AH's did with Hillary for 30 years

Hildabeast is a loopy kunt, and deserves to eat shit the rest of her life...

What will she do with Trumps bones?

 

[bripat9643]

Conspiracy is...so is obstruction of justice...

"Conspiricy" to do what? The obstruction of justice claim is laughable.

I guess we will see when the investigation concludes.

In other words, you have no evidence.

 

[bripat9643]

Nixon?

Wow! How pathetic and desperate you must be. Your while world is collapsing around you and you still make shit up that has nothing to do with the conversation.

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

 

[Seawytch]

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

 

[eddiew37]

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

 

[bripat9643]

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

What evidence does he have?

 

[bripat9643]

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

What is the AH? You still can't even tell us what crime Trump supposedly committed, so where do you get off claiming we would support him even though he committed a crime? It's obvious you condemn him even though you haven't got a shred of evidence that he's done anything illegal.

 

[eddiew37]

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

What evidence does he have?

He's keeping it under his vest until evidence is complete

 

[eddiew37]

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

What is the AH? You still can't even tell us what crime Trump supposedly committed, so where do you get off claiming we would support him even though he committed a crime? It's obvious you condemn him even though you haven't got a shred of evidence that he's done anything illegal.

The man has a history bri of lying his ass off and screwing 1000's What more do you want?

 

[bripat9643]

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

What evidence does he have?

He's keeping it under his vest until evidence is complete

In other words, he's got no evidence. When has Mewler ever been able to keep anything from his investigation from leaking?

 

[bripat9643]

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

What is the AH? You still can't even tell us what crime Trump supposedly committed, so where do you get off claiming we would support him even though he committed a crime? It's obvious you condemn him even though you haven't got a shred of evidence that he's done anything illegal.

The man has a history bri of lying his ass off and screwing 1000's What more do you want?

Horseshit. That's Democrat concocted spin.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Corrupt Democratic Party is helping foreigners interfere with our elections.

They are blocking Voter ID laws so that illegal aliens can cancel-out the votes of American citizens.

Wonder how many millions of American citizens had their votes canceled-out in the 2016 election.

Do you think that the Democratic Party's Voting Rights Violations should be investigated?

 

[eddiew37]

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

What evidence does he have?

He's keeping it under his vest until evidence is complete

In other words, he's got no evidence. When has Mewler ever been able to keep anything from his investigation from leaking?

He leaks what he wants leaked Like rump leaked his ONE tax return

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The wind from liberals' head spinning 'round and 'round this morning feels as strong as gale force winds in a hurricane, and there is enough foam coming from snowflake mouths for the CDC to issue a precautionary 'Rabies Epidemic' Warning' after what President Trump just said...

"EVEN IF THERE WAS COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA, 'IT'S NOT A CRIME'"
-- President Donald Trump


The most awesome thing about that comment is IT IS 100% CORRECT.


Of course there was no 'collusion' committed by President Trump, but, as he says, 'COLLUSION' IS NOT EVEN A CRIME!

'Collusion' is a made-up political propaganda-generated term created specifically to give 'weight' to the false liberal claims / campaign that President Trump engaged in SOMETHING illegal designed to 'steal' the 2016 election.

The truly remarkable and hypocritical fact about this claim by Democrats is that their false claim is EXACTLY what they did, what released DNC e-mails exposed the Democrats / Hillary did during the election:
- Evidence exists showing Hillary and the DNC she 'owned' rigged the DNC primaries, cheated in debates, engaged in election fraud, illegally used information acquired by an ex-British Spy through a company working for the Russians in a US election (a CRIME), etc. ... YET (PERHAPS AS A DISTRACTION) THEY HAVE ACCUSED THE GOP OF DOING EXACTLY WHAT EVIDENCE SHOWS THEY HAVE DONE....

Then there is what Obama himself stated - EVERY potential administration coming in gets a head-start by contacting and communicating with foreign reps....
-- Hmm, interesting how the Democrats suddenly blamed at election time - once Hillary lost - Trump for the RUSSIAN HACKING / INTERFERENCE COMEY AND OBAMA KNEW ABOUT / KNEW WAS GOIING ON SINCE 2014 YET DID NOTHING ABOUT.


But what chaps snowflakes' ass the most is that what Trump said is TRUE ' 'Collusion' is not illegal.

Even if it was, Mueller and the Democrats have found NOTHING...because there is NOTHING to find.


Trump: Even if there was collusion with Russia, 'it’s not a crime'

Clearly the Trump campaign was willing to accept help from anyone including Russia and that is a fact. Also these meetings occurred before Trump won. Whether it is illegal or not is something that neither Trump nor you know. The fact is that the Trump campaign engaged in unethical conduct to beat Clinton. Whether it is criminal. we will see. Americans recognize the implications and they want it looked at.

You are a hypocrite. The DNC e-mails were hacked by the Russians and then false information was mixed in. In 1 instance of false information, the letterhead of a Democrat Senator was forged. The goal was to inflame partisans against Clinton should she win. There is no evidence the Democrat primaries were rigged. You offer no proof of it and continue to use it. Clinton got 55% of the primary vote so why should she not have gotten the nomination. She also did not engage in any election fraud. Again more fiction. Also the company that produced the dossier was not working for the Russians.

You use the avatar of Captain America but you have more in common with Benedict Arnold. You defame America for your cheap partisan gain.

Why you projectionist, arrogant LYING, LYING hypocrite; you liberals are the self-loathing-American traitors who have BABY TANTRUM reactions to securing our borders and putting American interests first! You liberals are so willing to sell this country to the religion of endless human rights atrocities, Islam, which has been declaring war on American since the 1780's, you're the biggest traitors in the history of any country on earth! Jesus, you guys are disgusting. The dregs of the 3rd world are more important to you creatures than fellow Americans. EVERYTHING you said is a well-proven lie.

You are the arrogant, lying bastard. The fact is that Trump is not a conservative and neither are you. If Reagan was alive, you would be calling him a liberal. You are a racist bastard. I do not nor do the majority of Americans support a wall and they overwhelmingly support DACA. Believing in Islam does not make you a terrorist Herr Hitler. Compromise is not a dirty word. You are the treaitor to this country. Take your garbage and GO TO HELL.

Traditionally the treasonous left wing bigot Democrats have supported terrorism because they also hate America.

 

[eddiew37]

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

What is the AH? You still can't even tell us what crime Trump supposedly committed, so where do you get off claiming we would support him even though he committed a crime? It's obvious you condemn him even though you haven't got a shred of evidence that he's done anything illegal.

The man has a history bri of lying his ass off and screwing 1000's What more do you want?

Horseshit. That's Democrat concocted spin.

BRI You've signed his loyalty test ? If you don't know the most basic things about his history ,,you're really not worth answering anymore Sorry but ,,,,, goodbye

 

[bripat9643]

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

Robert Mueller and his team will be providing the evidence, not me.

What evidence does he have?

He's keeping it under his vest until evidence is complete

In other words, he's got no evidence. When has Mewler ever been able to keep anything from his investigation from leaking?

He leaks what he wants leaked Like rump leaked his ONE tax return

You mean Mewler is breaking the law? You condemn Trump because he supposedly broke the law, but you admire Mewler for doing it?

You realize, of course, that you just admitted you're an enormous hypocrite, don't you?

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Democrat/Press/Hollywood propaganda machine feeds the dumb liberal crackpots a daily dose of conspiracy, lies and hate.
They are unable to think for themselves.

 

[bripat9643]

None of you snowflakes have posted a shred of evidence that he's broken a single law.

The problem is bri the AH can commit murder and people like you would still support him Like him you have no filter either and a president with no filter is a disaster on its way

What is the AH? You still can't even tell us what crime Trump supposedly committed, so where do you get off claiming we would support him even though he committed a crime? It's obvious you condemn him even though you haven't got a shred of evidence that he's done anything illegal.

The man has a history bri of lying his ass off and screwing 1000's What more do you want?

Horseshit. That's Democrat concocted spin.

BRI You've signed his loyalty test ? If you don't know the most basic things about his history ,,you're really not worth answering anymore Sorry but ,,,,, goodbye

ROFL! Bye coward! Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

So bringing up Hillary is okay but pointing out Nixon had defenders like you defend Trump is not. Got it.

Hardly anybody defended Nixon. I was 13 when he resigned!

I just gave you the link. People just like you defended Nixon.

Here is another

A forgotten lesson of Watergate: conservatives may rally around Trump

That’s because the Watergate affair turned conservative skeptics of Richard Nixon into hardcore supporters, drawing out the immediate crisis and deepening divisions in the long term. Conservatives at the time refashioned the scandal into a tale of Democratic hypocrisy and media hostility — a narrative that many Republicans have adopted once again to explain away the emerging Trump scandal.[...]

Watergate, of all things, brought conservatives back into the fold. The emerging scandal absorbed the administration not long after Nixon’s second term began. For a generation of mainstream journalists, the scandal would confirm the power of the press to serve as a check on corruption, no matter how powerful the perpetrator. For conservatives, however, the scandal and the press’s role in prosecuting it looked much different. They saw the press as trying to undo the decisive results of the 1972 election. And if the media was so terrified of Nixon, then maybe there was something to the man after all.[...]

As the rest of the nation followed the unfolding story of corruption and cover-ups, the Watergate-as-liberal-conspiracy narrative quickly took hold in conservative media. After listening to the Lyons interview, Paul Harvey, the radio personality, repeated the attack in his nationally syndicated broadcast. How, he wondered, could the American people accept an all-powerful media capable of turning “a prosecution into a persecution”? And when Sen. Jesse Helms appeared on Manion’s show, he railed against “the incredible New York Times-Washington Post syndicate, which controls to a large degree what the American people will read and learn.”

You guys need a new playbook.

Can you wake up and smell the coffee? Nixon left office 43 years ago, when I was a teenager. Nothing compares to anything going on today, despite your pathetic mental meanderings.

Nothing compares ?? Firing Comey Bashing Mueller NY Times Wash Post all media... repeating 16 times no conspiracy The man is guilty as sin ,just a matter of time to nail the SOB

And more good news admiral ,,Time is on our side ,We have 3 years to get the corrupt pos And more good news We might keep getting on his case even after he leaves Sorta like your AH's did with Hillary for 30 years

What is Trump's corruption?