Third time - lack of peace is not a static condition. There are more violent and bloody times, there are less violent and bloody times.
Clearly, it's okay with you and others to incite more violence and death in exchange for whatever positive is coming from this voluntary decision.
That is clearly an acceptable trade-off for you.
I get that, and I think we have that settled.
.
clearly in the questions i have asked i don't know enough and clearly i simply don't agree with your assessment in "Death or More Death".
Subscribe to read
2015 is one of the most violent times in the region it would seem.
2013 they felt it couldn't get worse and yet, it did.
end of the above article:
“The conditions under which 2014 developed did not change,” Ms Scheller said. “The less governance there is, the more chaos and devastation and the less prospect for any settlement that will lead to quick results.”
so are we establishing MORE governance there by doing this? from this article it would be what is needed to calm down the violence.
you continue to say that doing this will cause there to be MORE violence and i don't disagree at all. AT ALL.
but i do ask *WHEN* would be a good time to do this and there simply is no answer. not from you or me or anyone that i can find. there is clearly a stall by the arab states to NOT make this decision and NOT promote peace and there is nothing on the horizon that will bring them to the table to talk and end this.
NOTHING.
so - i ask again *when* would there be a good time to do this? if your stance is *never do it, people will get hurt* great. say so. i disagree but would respect your views.