āChina did everything right ā ā- BWKYou definitely are not perfect. More like down right dumb as shit with no arguments. Heading to bed. You can finally jerk off on your big loss for the night, where you said absolutely nothing. Keep up the good work loser.We cannot all be perfect and state that āChina did everything rightā like you did. LOLIn your Trump toad fantasies. The point is, you can't give a definitive number, so it is not, and never will be perfect.How is that possible when BWK stated that āChina did everything rightā?No numbers tell us you were posting an estimate which is worth teats. Try again.Chinaās economic data have always been fraught. Now, all eyes are on the coronavirus numbers, which economists and investors are using to estimate the outbreakās tollāand they are too perfect to mean much. "Estimate"? You're going to lie to I guess? When are you pussy ass Trump toads going to produce actual documented numbers? Answer, you're not, because you're a bunch of sore losers who can't do anything but post bs and lies. Get the hell out of here you bunch of losers.They've been lying all along, of course. It's how China does everything right. Lol.
The same lying pussbags that drove SARS patients around in ambulances to hide them from the WHO in 2013 haven't changed a bit.
Chinaās Coronavirus Figures Donāt Add Up. āThis Never Happens With Real Data.ā
Anomalies had shown up in Chinaās coronavirus numbers even before health officials changed how they diagnose the Wuhan virus this week. For instance, the number of deaths reported appeared to correspond to a simple mathematical formula to a very high accuracy.www.barrons.com
Thread by @V2019N: "Now, all eyes are on the coronavirus numbers, which economists & investors using to estimate the outbreakās tollā& they are too perā¦
Thread by @V2019N: "Now, all eyes are on the coronavirus numbers, which economists & investors using to estimate the outbreakās tollā&y are too perfect to mean much." What does this mean for investors and analysts? If something seems too good to bā¦threadreaderapp.com
"A statistical analysis of Chinaās coronavirus casualty data shows a near-perfect prediction model that data analysts say isnāt likely to naturally occur, casting doubt over the reliability of the numbers being reported to the @WHO
Barronās re-created regression analysis of total deaths caused by #coronavirus and found similarly high variance. The high r-squared means there is essentially zero unexpected variability in reported cases day after day.
"Never in my years seen an r-squared of 0.99. As a statistician, it makes me question the data. Real human data never perfectly predictive when it comes to something like an epidemic since there are countless ways that a person could come into contact with the virus."
The "estimate" you grabbed was from a sentence indicating that people were using these bogus numbers to estimate things. Read the sentence you yourself highlighted, moron.
I'm lying by presenting a study done by statisticians which indicates China's numbers are statistically impossible and this garbled shit is your response.
You really are a dense one, aren't you. Lol.
I didn't post an estimate dumbass. Again, read the sentence you highlighted.
I posted the results/conclusions of a statistical analysis. Statistical analysis is anything but an 'estimate'. Duh.
You wanted numbers you got numbers. China's reported numbers are statistically impossible.
The End.
Oh they did it exactly right.
"The high r-squared means there is essentially zero unexpected variability in reported cases day after day."
Perfect. Too perfect.
Post of the century