Trump is the Real DEI Candidate

You guys do get awfully cagey about anyone who wants to cut down on disinformation.

Like all wannabe fascists, you know this is clearly a tool you don't want to lose.
I saw a commercial of a blue-collar guy down her speaking of the virtues of voting for Kamala. Say she is giving the peasants a nice tax cut. I do not know what that is though and she would spew it for us all if she was.
 
You guys do get awfully cagey about anyone who wants to cut down on disinformation.

Like all wannabe fascists, you know this is clearly a tool you don't want to lose.
the left gets to decide what is and isn't true eh ??
 
the left gets to decide what is and isn't true eh ??
Do you believe the government controls the weather and is sending hurricanes to harm Trump voters?
 
Do you believe the government controls the weather and is sending hurricanes to harm Trump voters?
I don't believe in the tooth fairy is real or men can get pregnant either .. but I do believe crazy people have the right to say its true .. start censoring and banning free speech you don't agree with is the biggest step towards tyranny ..but of course that's what people like you want .. freedom is hard and messy ..weak people want leaders to control and instruct them ..
 
I don't believe in the tooth fairy is real or men can get pregnant either .. but I do believe crazy people have the right to say its true .. start censoring and banning free speech you don't agree with is the biggest step towards tyranny ..but of course that's what people like you want .. freedom is hard and messy ..weak people want leaders to control and instruct them ..
Who is banning free speech?

Other than DeSantis.
 
had to dig deep to find that eh ..while the Dems constantly call for censoring speech they disagree with 24/7 ..
It literally just happened. Didn’t have to dig at all.

This also just happened:

Who on the left wants to criminally prosecute people for speech?
 
If it stands for Demented, Elderly, Incompetent, then I'm down.
 
You took Kerry’s statements out of context and now had to walk it back to say he “implied” something. Sure. You are welcome to your opinion of what he implied, but since it’s an opinion it’s neither true nor false.

Democracies around the world now are struggling with the absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and there’s no one who defines what facts really are.”

That is a direct quote. It is pretty clear that if Democracies are “struggling” without some sort of “truth arbiter”, he is suggesting that one is needed. Surely, even you can understand this. The attendees at the WEF certainly did.

I didn’t make an excuse, I am pointing out that your assertion lacked context which is supposedly dangerous.

So now all of a sudden context is important. Funny. What context would make what Kerry said more palatable to those of us that cringe at the mention of a “truth arbiter” potentially assisting with Democracies that are “struggling”?
 
Turns out your leaders want to. And you’re voting for them.

How is Trump saying that CBS, for example, shouldn’t be able to pass themselves off as a news organization if they are going to edit certain content to favor one party/person over another? That isn’t an attack on the first Amendment. What he is saying is they should provide the full context, without using an editorial license to spin. We all know that if he misspoke during an interview, they would focus solely on what he said that was incorrect or incoherent. In fact, they would purposely leave out any information that clarified any missteps. We have already seen this selective editing in action several times by the MSM. Trump is suggesting to air it all and let the people decide. That is exactly the opposite of condemning free speech. Remember, CBS is not the same as Facebook or X because they directly control the content.

By the way, the article you posted is pure, biased trash. If that is the kind of stuff you read, no wonder you are so lost.
 
Democracies around the world now are struggling with the absence of a sort of truth arbiter, and there’s no one who defines what facts really are.”

That is a direct quote. It is pretty clear that if Democracies are “struggling” without some sort of “truth arbiter”, he is suggesting that one is needed. Surely, even you can understand this. The attendees at the WEF certainly did.



So now all of a sudden context is important. Funny. What context would make what Kerry said more palatable to those of us that cringe at the mention of a “truth arbiter” potentially assisting with Democracies that are “struggling”?
/—-/ Let me help everyone understand Lurch’s true meaning.
truth arbiter = censor.
 
How is Trump saying that CBS, for example, shouldn’t be able to pass themselves off as a news organization if they are going to edit certain content to favor one party/person over another? That isn’t an attack on the first Amendment. What he is saying is they should provide the full context, without using an editorial license to spin. We all know that if he misspoke during an interview, they would focus solely on what he said that was incorrect or incoherent. In fact, they would purposely leave out any information that clarified any missteps. We have already seen this selective editing in action several times by the MSM. Trump is suggesting to air it all and let the people decide. That is exactly the opposite of condemning free speech. Remember, CBS is not the same as Facebook or X because they directly control the content.

By the way, the article you posted is pure, biased trash. If that is the kind of stuff you read, no wonder you are so lost.
If that’s all Trump was saying, why does he call for an investigation and call it potentially “illegal”?

You are very good at morphing Trump’s statement into something different and more palatable to yourself. It’s proof of your extreme bias.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA
Back
Top Bottom