TRUMP is the dangerous RADICAL ..... Biden is the safe Moderate

Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Yeah, like the rest of the world, especially in the liberal Utopia, Europe.
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.
They are globalists owned by the CFR, how about answering my question? Specific policy please.
What I find “radical” (aka “extreme” in my book) about Trump’s administration?
For starters ...
Trump has regularly praised the actions of dictators and human rights abusers. He proclaimed his “love” and “great respect” for North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un, endorsed “brilliant leader” Xi Jinping’s move to serve as China’s president for life, repeatedly sided with Vladimir Putin against our own intelligence community, and pronounced himself a “big fan” of Turkish president Recep Erdogan despite his crackdown on democracy.
Why does Trump not side with NATO allies in condemning the Kremlin poisoning of the Russian dissident Navalny?
.

:auiqs.jpg:


Well, if you looked at the link I gave you, it would highlight the problem we have in the west, namely, the interlocking directorate is more concerned with making it's elite members wealthy, than actually protecting or furthering the interests of individual nations or the folks in those nations.

What does this mean? It means as nations get more rich, and governments get larger, and they get more secret, the lies and clandestine operations around them to support the elites grow more and more corrupt.

Essentially, what you are basing your opinion and your worldview on, is. . . lies, misinformation.

Haven't you read Bernay's classic, and industry standard in this regard? PROPAGANDA. You are basically telling me, you are going to trust the Billionaires, and the multinational trillion-dollar corporations and the Empires that have given us that war on terror, the drug war. . . well, if we go back far enough, hell, WWI, WWII, slavery, the Great Depression, hell, you name the crime against humanity, they have given it to us. . . wake the fuck up man. Throw off the chains that enslave your fucking mind.

Everything you believe is wrong.


The False Flag Poisoning of Alexei Navalny


". . . However, no verifiable evidence was ever provided by the British government showing that the two were responsible, though it was conveniently claimed that the would-be culprits clumsily left vestiges of the fatal chemical agent in their hotel room.

So, not only is Russian intelligence incapable of carrying out successful assassinations, but carelessly unable to cover their tracks? The premise was already absurd enough but made even more fanciful by Britain’s refusal to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention in providing Moscow with requested samples of the toxin which purportedly poisoned the treasonous ex-spook and his daughter. Thus far in the Navalny case, Germany is following the same script.

What a coincidence that the attack comes just as Nord Stream 2, the second line of the massive natural gas pipeline under construction from Russia to Germany opposed by the US and several NATO allies, is near completion.

Suddenly, the diplomatic fall-out has put the controversial project in limbo, with Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German government under pressure from Washington to withdraw from the project which would increase Russian influence on Europe’s energy infrastructure and rival the US’s costlier exports.

As pointed out by Die Linke’s Dietmar Bartsch, where were the calls to halt the purchase of Saudi oil imports after the grisly murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi? It is clear that the Anglo-Americans are simply desperate to halt the resurgence of Moscow on the international stage, threatening their German counterparts with sanctions as the final sections of the pipeline conveying Russian gas across the Baltic Sea is being constructed.

The attack on Navalny could not occur at a more auspicious time for the Atlanticists and a worse time for Moscow.

The notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin would try to assassinate an opposition figure who holds a minuscule 2% support amongst the population, far behind other opponents nonexistent to Western media, but the one who just so happens to be favored by Washington, is contrary to any reason or common sense.

Not to mention, at the exact moment it would jeopardize a project essential to Russia’s economic growth and frugality, as the pipeline would link Moscow with Western Europe bypassing neighboring transit countries such as the Ukraine (also opposed to Nord Stream 2) which have costly transit fees.

Is it really the Russian government who stands to massively benefit from this fiasco?

The answer to “cui bono?” could not be more clear: US, Saudi and Emirati oil and gas interests, not the Kremlin. Russia was also recently the first nation to develop a COVID-19 vaccine candidate with its Sputnik V registered in August, an international competition that has been heavily politicized by Washington which is eager to cast aspersions on Moscow’s accomplishment.

Meanwhile, Germany is also the one Western European country where Washington’s anti-Russian propaganda is falling flat, as recent polls consistently show that the vast majority of Germans don’t see Russia as a threat, likely a result of their high rate of media literacy.. . . "



So here Trump is, trying to negotiate a fair peace and a multi-polar world of coexistence, and you are repeating war propaganda that only benefits the military-industrial-complex.

. . . what do you have to gain from war? Invested in those companies are you?

 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Cop out answer.
You have no way to know if Trump handled it right or not. Nore do you know if the Hildabeast would have done better.
One year ago (October 25, 2019), ... BEFORE COVID-19 broke out of China, Biden wrote: “the U.S. is not prepared for a global pandemic," citing actions from Trump as a primary reason:
"Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores."

Trump's tweet that same day:
"the button on the iPhone was FAR better than the swipe!".

Wow, Trump knows how to take national security seriously ... NOT!
.

Do you actually believe Hiden has the brain capacity to make that claim?
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Cop out answer.
You have no way to know if Trump handled it right or not. Nore do you know if the Hildabeast would have done better.
One year ago (October 25, 2019), ... BEFORE COVID-19 broke out of China, Biden wrote: “the U.S. is not prepared for a global pandemic," citing actions from Trump as a primary reason:
"Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores."

Trump's tweet that same day:
"the button on the iPhone was FAR better than the swipe!".

Wow, Trump knows how to take national security seriously ... NOT!
.

I guess you failed to research Obama/Biden's response to H1N1. Talk about a disaster. 60 million infected in the US. They were just fortunate that the mortality rate for H1N1 wasn't at 99% like COVID. It was considerably less throughout the world.
 
We get it you are upset that democrats are not going to win.
perhaps rely more on a decent candidate instead of fear and lies.
I’m upset because an ethical Libertarian will not win.
However, Biden is more ETHICAL than Trump, so it’s not so bad.
And it looks like BIDEN WILL WIN, according to the historian who predicted every POTUS election outcome since 1984 ...

Historian Who's Guessed All Presidents Correctly Since 1984 Predicts Biden Victory
.
Yeah and Northpole who has done just as well says Trump 91, Biden 9.
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Cop out answer.
You have no way to know if Trump handled it right or not. Nore do you know if the Hildabeast would have done better.
One year ago (October 25, 2019), ... BEFORE COVID-19 broke out of China, Biden wrote: “the U.S. is not prepared for a global pandemic," citing actions from Trump as a primary reason:
"Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores."

Trump's tweet that same day:
"the button on the iPhone was FAR better than the swipe!".

Wow, Trump knows how to take national security seriously ... NOT!
.

Do you actually believe Hiden has the brain capacity to make that claim?
Hiden?
You meant Biden. He DID say that. His brain capacity is better than the younger Trump, who acts like a 5-year-old.

Did Biden Tweet 'We Are Not Prepared for a Pandemic' Before COVID-19?
 
Last edited:
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Cop out answer.
You have no way to know if Trump handled it right or not. Nore do you know if the Hildabeast would have done better.
One year ago (October 25, 2019), ... BEFORE COVID-19 broke out of China, Biden wrote: “the U.S. is not prepared for a global pandemic," citing actions from Trump as a primary reason:
"Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores."

Trump's tweet that same day:
"the button on the iPhone was FAR better than the swipe!".

Wow, Trump knows how to take national security seriously ... NOT!
.

Do you actually believe Hiden has the brain capacity to make that claim?
Hiden? Biden DID say that. His brain capacity is better than the younger Trump, who acts like a 5-year-old.

Did Biden Tweet 'We Are Not Prepared for a Pandemic' Before COVID-19?
.




.

.

Did he?
I bet a dollar for donuts someone else writes his tweets.
 
if Biden really wants to work with moderate Republicans, why is he campaigning in Georgia, Texas, Iowa, and Maine...all states with moderate republican senators up for re-election

he was quoted in the press as saying:

“I can’t tell you how important it is that we flip the United States Senate. There's no state more consequential than Georgia in that fight,” the former vice president and 36-year Senate veteran said.

 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


Biden kneels with BLM. thinks Antifa is an idea, and wants to defund the police and pack the courts. White nationalists even back his candidacy. Meanwhile Kamala is paying the bail of rioters.

President Trump has disavowed extremists for decades. Wants to make America great again.
 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


It's entertaining how you claim Trump induces fear into HIS campaign yet support Biden in the same message. That's called intellectual dishonesty PROG

Yet the PROG is going to tell us what normal is.
Apparently, you don’t know what intellectual honesty is. Please explain to vindicate yourself.
Are all those mainstream Republicans who support Biden “intellectually dishonest”?
.

No, they're part of an establishment, thus bad intentions, thus dishonest as opposed intellectually dishonest. "All" has no meaning to me, because it doesn't apply in most cases, same with your use of it. That's called intellectual honesty on my part.

Are you sure it's me who doesn't know what intellectual honesty is? Seems you missed it and projected.

If you ask me nicely, I'll check your posts and pull one that's intellectually dishonest for a practical example. It won't take much effort on my part, which is called an educated guess.
Please do so, and be specific in your example of “intellectual dishonesty”.
I hope you did not learn from Trump :)
.

Your last post reads as follows: "Hiden? Biden DID say that. His brain capacity is better than the younger Trump, who acts like a 5-year-old."

That can be any of the three types of dishonesty I mentioned, including intellectual dishonesty. Nobody believes you, they can only desire it be true. Convinced or should I check your second to last post next?
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Because they're part of the swamp.
The thing I find puzzling about leftist is they cant see the red flags.
It's obvious to me and most thinking people that when you have so many politicians against a president that has been so successful there has to be a reason. Yet they dont seem to see it.
Trump “so successful” with his non-plan for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic that’s spreading even more now after 9 months?
.

Cop out answer.
You have no way to know if Trump handled it right or not. Nore do you know if the Hildabeast would have done better.
One year ago (October 25, 2019), ... BEFORE COVID-19 broke out of China, Biden wrote: “the U.S. is not prepared for a global pandemic," citing actions from Trump as a primary reason:
"Trump has rolled back progress President Obama and I made to strengthen global health security. We need leadership that builds public trust, focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores."

Trump's tweet that same day:
"the button on the iPhone was FAR better than the swipe!".

Wow, Trump knows how to take national security seriously ... NOT!
.

I guess you failed to research Obama/Biden's response to H1N1. Talk about a disaster. 60 million infected in the US. They were just fortunate that the mortality rate for H1N1 wasn't at 99% like COVID. It was considerably less throughout the world.
The COVID-19 comparison to H1N1 is bogus; Obama administration’s response to the swine flu wasn’t the calamity that Trump and Pence have made it seem.
Trump falsely claimed that Obama “didn’t do anything” about swine flu.
Obama knew (he read expert briefs, unlike Trump) that swine flu was rarely lethal at the time and factored that fact into his decision-making in order to ensure that there wouldn’t be much disruption to the economy. (The mortality rate for H1N1 was 0.02 percent, while the mortality rate for COVID-19 is 0.65 percent.)
Some medical experts actually criticized Obama for being too proactive about the swine flu given how mild it was!

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/10/h1n1-swine-flu-covid-pence-trump-debate.html
.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.
They are globalists owned by the CFR, how about answering my question? Specific policy please.
What I find “radical” (aka “extreme” in my book) about Trump’s administration?
For starters ...
Trump has regularly praised the actions of dictators and human rights abusers. He proclaimed his “love” and “great respect” for North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un, endorsed “brilliant leader” Xi Jinping’s move to serve as China’s president for life, repeatedly sided with Vladimir Putin against our own intelligence community, and pronounced himself a “big fan” of Turkish president Recep Erdogan despite his crackdown on democracy.
Why does Trump not side with NATO allies in condemning the Kremlin poisoning of the Russian dissident Navalny?
.

:auiqs.jpg:


Well, if you looked at the link I gave you, it would highlight the problem we have in the west, namely, the interlocking directorate is more concerned with making it's elite members wealthy, than actually protecting or furthering the interests of individual nations or the folks in those nations.

What does this mean? It means as nations get more rich, and governments get larger, and they get more secret, the lies and clandestine operations around them to support the elites grow more and more corrupt.

Essentially, what you are basing your opinion and your worldview on, is. . . lies, misinformation.

Haven't you read Bernay's classic, and industry standard in this regard? PROPAGANDA. You are basically telling me, you are going to trust the Billionaires, and the multinational trillion-dollar corporations and the Empires that have given us that war on terror, the drug war. . . well, if we go back far enough, hell, WWI, WWII, slavery, the Great Depression, hell, you name the crime against humanity, they have given it to us. . . wake the fuck up man. Throw off the chains that enslave your fucking mind.

Everything you believe is wrong.


The False Flag Poisoning of Alexei Navalny


". . . However, no verifiable evidence was ever provided by the British government showing that the two were responsible, though it was conveniently claimed that the would-be culprits clumsily left vestiges of the fatal chemical agent in their hotel room.

So, not only is Russian intelligence incapable of carrying out successful assassinations, but carelessly unable to cover their tracks? The premise was already absurd enough but made even more fanciful by Britain’s refusal to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention in providing Moscow with requested samples of the toxin which purportedly poisoned the treasonous ex-spook and his daughter. Thus far in the Navalny case, Germany is following the same script.

What a coincidence that the attack comes just as Nord Stream 2, the second line of the massive natural gas pipeline under construction from Russia to Germany opposed by the US and several NATO allies, is near completion.

Suddenly, the diplomatic fall-out has put the controversial project in limbo, with Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German government under pressure from Washington to withdraw from the project which would increase Russian influence on Europe’s energy infrastructure and rival the US’s costlier exports.

As pointed out by Die Linke’s Dietmar Bartsch, where were the calls to halt the purchase of Saudi oil imports after the grisly murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi? It is clear that the Anglo-Americans are simply desperate to halt the resurgence of Moscow on the international stage, threatening their German counterparts with sanctions as the final sections of the pipeline conveying Russian gas across the Baltic Sea is being constructed.

The attack on Navalny could not occur at a more auspicious time for the Atlanticists and a worse time for Moscow.

The notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin would try to assassinate an opposition figure who holds a minuscule 2% support amongst the population, far behind other opponents nonexistent to Western media, but the one who just so happens to be favored by Washington, is contrary to any reason or common sense.

Not to mention, at the exact moment it would jeopardize a project essential to Russia’s economic growth and frugality, as the pipeline would link Moscow with Western Europe bypassing neighboring transit countries such as the Ukraine (also opposed to Nord Stream 2) which have costly transit fees.

Is it really the Russian government who stands to massively benefit from this fiasco?

The answer to “cui bono?” could not be more clear: US, Saudi and Emirati oil and gas interests, not the Kremlin. Russia was also recently the first nation to develop a COVID-19 vaccine candidate with its Sputnik V registered in August, an international competition that has been heavily politicized by Washington which is eager to cast aspersions on Moscow’s accomplishment.

Meanwhile, Germany is also the one Western European country where Washington’s anti-Russian propaganda is falling flat, as recent polls consistently show that the vast majority of Germans don’t see Russia as a threat, likely a result of their high rate of media literacy.. . . "



So here Trump is, trying to negotiate a fair peace and a multi-polar world of coexistence, and you are repeating war propaganda that only benefits the military-industrial-complex.

. . . what do you have to gain from war? Invested in those companies are you?
Wow, what a long post. Reminds me of Russian propaganda. :)
They play an effective kid’s tactic. ... You fart in a group, then say “Who farted? Not me!”

Why don’t you want to believe in American & German intelligence?
Prefer to believe Putin, like Trump?

A German military lab confirmed that Navalny had consumed a variant of Novichok, a Soviet-era nerve agent. A German government spokesman said the evidence is "without a doubt."

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/02/9087...isoned-with-novichok-nerve-agent-germany-says

"There's no doubt whatsoever" that Navalny's poisoning was approved by the highest levels of Russia's government, according to former CIA chief of Russia operations Steven Hall.
The Novichok group of nerve agents was developed in a top-secret laboratory in Moscow and was once a closely held secret of the Russian government.
.
 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


It's entertaining how you claim Trump induces fear into HIS campaign yet support Biden in the same message. That's called intellectual dishonesty PROG

Yet the PROG is going to tell us what normal is.
Apparently, you don’t know what intellectual honesty is. Please explain to vindicate yourself.
Are all those mainstream Republicans who support Biden “intellectually dishonest”?
.

No, they're part of an establishment, thus bad intentions, thus dishonest as opposed intellectually dishonest. "All" has no meaning to me, because it doesn't apply in most cases, same with your use of it. That's called intellectual honesty on my part.

Are you sure it's me who doesn't know what intellectual honesty is? Seems you missed it and projected.

If you ask me nicely, I'll check your posts and pull one that's intellectually dishonest for a practical example. It won't take much effort on my part, which is called an educated guess.
Please do so, and be specific in your example of “intellectual dishonesty”.
I hope you did not learn from Trump :)
.

Your last post reads as follows: "Hiden? Biden DID say that. His brain capacity is better than the younger Trump, who acts like a 5-year-old."

That can be any of the three types of dishonesty I mentioned, including intellectual dishonesty. Nobody believes you, they can only desire it be true. Convinced or should I check your second to last post next?
Lame!
The poster I responded to wrote Hiden and I questioned that!
I responded to their surprise that Biden was concerned about Trump’s lack of preparedness with a pandemic BEFORE COVID-19 broke out.
Re-read my post AND previous text in THAT post.

Try again.
.
 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


Biden kneels with BLM. thinks Antifa is an idea, and wants to defund the police and pack the courts. White nationalists even back his candidacy. Meanwhile Kamala is paying the bail of rioters.

President Trump has disavowed extremists for decades. Wants to make America great again.
America has been great before Trump came on the scene.
Biden does NOT want to defund police forces! He wants to improve them.
The FBI believes White Supremists are a national threat, while “antifa” is a largely unstructured far-left movement, which is also violent.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-intelligence-homeland-idUSKBN26N35E
.
 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


Biden kneels with BLM. thinks Antifa is an idea, and wants to defund the police and pack the courts. White nationalists even back his candidacy. Meanwhile Kamala is paying the bail of rioters.

President Trump has disavowed extremists for decades. Wants to make America great again.
So white nationalists back Biden because he kneels with BLM?

 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


It's entertaining how you claim Trump induces fear into HIS campaign yet support Biden in the same message. That's called intellectual dishonesty PROG

Yet the PROG is going to tell us what normal is.
Apparently, you don’t know what intellectual honesty is. Please explain to vindicate yourself.
Are all those mainstream Republicans who support Biden “intellectually dishonest”?
.

No, they're part of an establishment, thus bad intentions, thus dishonest as opposed intellectually dishonest. "All" has no meaning to me, because it doesn't apply in most cases, same with your use of it. That's called intellectual honesty on my part.

Are you sure it's me who doesn't know what intellectual honesty is? Seems you missed it and projected.

If you ask me nicely, I'll check your posts and pull one that's intellectually dishonest for a practical example. It won't take much effort on my part, which is called an educated guess.
Please do so, and be specific in your example of “intellectual dishonesty”.
I hope you did not learn from Trump :)
.

Your last post reads as follows: "Hiden? Biden DID say that. His brain capacity is better than the younger Trump, who acts like a 5-year-old."

That can be any of the three types of dishonesty I mentioned, including intellectual dishonesty. Nobody believes you, they can only desire it be true. Convinced or should I check your second to last post next?
Lame!
The poster I responded to wrote Hiden and I questioned that!
I responded to their surprise that Biden was concerned about Trump’s lack of preparedness with a pandemic BEFORE COVID-19 broke out.
Re-read my post AND previous text in THAT post.

Try again.
.

Ah I see. Your position is to misrepresent what you stated and leave context too. Three type of dishonesty, let's see which one applies to your post I'm responding to:

Intellectual dishonesty? Nah.
Dishonest with yourself? I'm going to say probably not.
Outright lie intended to mislead & misinform? Bingo!
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.

Many?

A half dozen funded by George Soros?

You moron Marxists are so full of shit.
 
Other than the Independents & Libertarians (i am one of them; the ethical kind), there are FOUR (4) major political groups:

-Trump-RNC party (extreme right);
-Normal GOP (moderate right);
-Democratic Party (moderate left);
-Socialist Democrats (extreme left)

Trump is trying to induce Chicken-Little FEAR into his campaign, declaring that Biden is a radical.
In reality, Trump is the dangerous extremist-radical on the US political spectrum, while Biden is mainstream.
Biden beat out the extremists in his party to win the DNC nomination, while Trump beat out the traditional Republicans to win the RNC nomination again.

The RADICAL Trump party is not the party of Reagan/Bush, who did not kiss up to the Russian communists & authoritarians.
Trump needs Putin to win votes (Trump mostly cares about himself & getting re-elected), and pretends to be a Christian and love America. What BS!
That’s why normal Republicans are siding with the MODERATE Biden.


Biden kneels with BLM. thinks Antifa is an idea, and wants to defund the police and pack the courts. White nationalists even back his candidacy. Meanwhile Kamala is paying the bail of rioters.

President Trump has disavowed extremists for decades. Wants to make America great again.
So white nationalists back Biden because he kneels with BLM?


Who knows, but they do back Biden.

{

White nationalist Richard Spencer reiterated his support for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden Tuesday, days after a spokesman for the Biden campaign rejected Spencer's endorsement.

Replying to a tweet Tuesday morning, Spencer wrote that he recognized how "ineffective, useless, and traitorous the GOP is," reaffirming his decision to vote for Biden in the November election.

}
 
Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain? :)

How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.
They are globalists owned by the CFR, how about answering my question? Specific policy please.
What I find “radical” (aka “extreme” in my book) about Trump’s administration?
For starters ...
Trump has regularly praised the actions of dictators and human rights abusers. He proclaimed his “love” and “great respect” for North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un, endorsed “brilliant leader” Xi Jinping’s move to serve as China’s president for life, repeatedly sided with Vladimir Putin against our own intelligence community, and pronounced himself a “big fan” of Turkish president Recep Erdogan despite his crackdown on democracy.
Why does Trump not side with NATO allies in condemning the Kremlin poisoning of the Russian dissident Navalny?
.

:auiqs.jpg:


Well, if you looked at the link I gave you, it would highlight the problem we have in the west, namely, the interlocking directorate is more concerned with making it's elite members wealthy, than actually protecting or furthering the interests of individual nations or the folks in those nations.

What does this mean? It means as nations get more rich, and governments get larger, and they get more secret, the lies and clandestine operations around them to support the elites grow more and more corrupt.

Essentially, what you are basing your opinion and your worldview on, is. . . lies, misinformation.

Haven't you read Bernay's classic, and industry standard in this regard? PROPAGANDA. You are basically telling me, you are going to trust the Billionaires, and the multinational trillion-dollar corporations and the Empires that have given us that war on terror, the drug war. . . well, if we go back far enough, hell, WWI, WWII, slavery, the Great Depression, hell, you name the crime against humanity, they have given it to us. . . wake the fuck up man. Throw off the chains that enslave your fucking mind.

Everything you believe is wrong.


The False Flag Poisoning of Alexei Navalny


". . . However, no verifiable evidence was ever provided by the British government showing that the two were responsible, though it was conveniently claimed that the would-be culprits clumsily left vestiges of the fatal chemical agent in their hotel room.

So, not only is Russian intelligence incapable of carrying out successful assassinations, but carelessly unable to cover their tracks? The premise was already absurd enough but made even more fanciful by Britain’s refusal to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention in providing Moscow with requested samples of the toxin which purportedly poisoned the treasonous ex-spook and his daughter. Thus far in the Navalny case, Germany is following the same script.

What a coincidence that the attack comes just as Nord Stream 2, the second line of the massive natural gas pipeline under construction from Russia to Germany opposed by the US and several NATO allies, is near completion.

Suddenly, the diplomatic fall-out has put the controversial project in limbo, with Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German government under pressure from Washington to withdraw from the project which would increase Russian influence on Europe’s energy infrastructure and rival the US’s costlier exports.

As pointed out by Die Linke’s Dietmar Bartsch, where were the calls to halt the purchase of Saudi oil imports after the grisly murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi? It is clear that the Anglo-Americans are simply desperate to halt the resurgence of Moscow on the international stage, threatening their German counterparts with sanctions as the final sections of the pipeline conveying Russian gas across the Baltic Sea is being constructed.

The attack on Navalny could not occur at a more auspicious time for the Atlanticists and a worse time for Moscow.

The notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin would try to assassinate an opposition figure who holds a minuscule 2% support amongst the population, far behind other opponents nonexistent to Western media, but the one who just so happens to be favored by Washington, is contrary to any reason or common sense.

Not to mention, at the exact moment it would jeopardize a project essential to Russia’s economic growth and frugality, as the pipeline would link Moscow with Western Europe bypassing neighboring transit countries such as the Ukraine (also opposed to Nord Stream 2) which have costly transit fees.

Is it really the Russian government who stands to massively benefit from this fiasco?

The answer to “cui bono?” could not be more clear: US, Saudi and Emirati oil and gas interests, not the Kremlin. Russia was also recently the first nation to develop a COVID-19 vaccine candidate with its Sputnik V registered in August, an international competition that has been heavily politicized by Washington which is eager to cast aspersions on Moscow’s accomplishment.

Meanwhile, Germany is also the one Western European country where Washington’s anti-Russian propaganda is falling flat, as recent polls consistently show that the vast majority of Germans don’t see Russia as a threat, likely a result of their high rate of media literacy.. . . "



So here Trump is, trying to negotiate a fair peace and a multi-polar world of coexistence, and you are repeating war propaganda that only benefits the military-industrial-complex.

. . . what do you have to gain from war? Invested in those companies are you?
Wow, what a long post. Reminds me of Russian propaganda. :)
They play an effective kid’s tactic. ... You fart in a group, then say “Who farted? Not me!”

Why don’t you want to believe in American & German intelligence?
Prefer to believe Putin, like Trump?

A German military lab confirmed that Navalny had consumed a variant of Novichok, a Soviet-era nerve agent. A German government spokesman said the evidence is "without a doubt."

Alexei Navalny Was Poisoned With Novichok Nerve Agent 'To Silence Him,' Merkel Says

"There's no doubt whatsoever" that Navalny's poisoning was approved by the highest levels of Russia's government, according to former CIA chief of Russia operations Steven Hall.
The Novichok group of nerve agents was developed in a top-secret laboratory in Moscow and was once a closely held secret of the Russian government.
.

I just got done telling you these elites lie to you to stay in power and get more rich.

. . . and with each passing year, they are getting more and more corrupt, why are you not listening?

13 Times The News Lied To The American People And Proved You Can’t Always Trust Journalists

Hell, Trump's own Secretary of State is one of the most despicable pieces of shit on the planet.

I don't think even Trump likes him. :heehee:


Pompeo ‘I Was The CIA Director – We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole’
 
the most bold thing about Sleepy Joe Biden is that he's in his basement sleeping through the most important election in history

is that a good thing or a bad thing?
 

Forum List

Back
Top