Geez, very few (if any) substantive responses from all you Trumpsters.
You guys vote with your balls, not brain?
How about explaining why MANY past Republican officials are supporting Biden? THEY are the MODERATE Republicans, which makes Trump the RADICAL.
.
They are globalists owned
by the CFR, how about answering my question? Specific policy please.
What I find “radical” (aka “extreme” in my book) about Trump’s administration?
For starters ...
Trump has regularly praised the actions of dictators and human rights abusers. He proclaimed his “love” and “great respect” for North Korean strongman Kim Jong Un, endorsed “brilliant leader” Xi Jinping’s move to serve as China’s president for life, repeatedly sided with Vladimir Putin against our own intelligence community, and pronounced himself a “big fan” of Turkish president Recep Erdogan despite his crackdown on democracy.
Why does Trump not side with NATO allies in condemning the Kremlin poisoning of the Russian dissident Navalny?
.
Well, if you looked at the link I gave you, it would highlight the problem we have in the west, namely, the interlocking directorate is more concerned with making it's elite members wealthy, than actually protecting or furthering the interests of individual nations or the folks in those nations.
What does this mean? It means as nations get more rich, and governments get larger, and they get more secret, the lies and clandestine operations around them to support the elites grow more and more corrupt.
Essentially, what you are basing your opinion and your worldview on, is. . . lies, misinformation.
Haven't you read
Bernay's classic, and industry standard in this regard? PROPAGANDA. You are basically telling me, you are going to trust the Billionaires, and the multinational trillion-dollar corporations and the Empires that have given us that war on terror, the drug war. . . well, if we go back far enough, hell, WWI, WWII, slavery, the Great Depression, hell, you name the crime against humanity, they have given it to us. . . wake the **** up man. Throw off the chains that enslave your ******* mind.
Everything you believe is wrong.
The False Flag Poisoning of Alexei Navalny
Max Parry On August 20th, Russian opposition figure and self-styled “anti-corruption” activist Alexei Navalny fell seriously ill while in mid-flight from Tomsk, Siberia to the Russian capital. The …
off-guardian.org
". . . However, no verifiable evidence was ever provided by the British government showing that the two were responsible, though it was conveniently claimed that the would-be culprits clumsily left vestiges of the fatal chemical agent in their hotel room.
So, not only is Russian intelligence incapable of carrying out successful assassinations, but carelessly unable to cover their tracks? The premise was already absurd enough but made even more fanciful by Britain’s refusal to comply with the Chemical Weapons Convention in providing Moscow with requested samples of the toxin which purportedly poisoned the treasonous ex-spook and his daughter. Thus far in the Navalny case, Germany is following the same script.
What a coincidence that the attack comes just as Nord Stream 2, the second line of the massive natural gas pipeline under construction from Russia to Germany opposed by the US and several NATO allies, is near completion.
Suddenly, the diplomatic fall-out has put the controversial project in limbo, with Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German government under pressure from Washington to withdraw from the project which would increase Russian influence on Europe’s energy infrastructure and rival the US’s costlier exports.
As pointed out by Die Linke’s Dietmar Bartsch, where were the calls to halt the purchase of Saudi oil imports after the grisly murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi? It is clear that the Anglo-Americans are simply desperate to halt the resurgence of Moscow on the international stage, threatening their German counterparts with sanctions as the final sections of the pipeline conveying Russian gas across the Baltic Sea is being constructed.
The attack on Navalny could not occur at a more auspicious time for the Atlanticists and a worse time for Moscow.
The notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin would try to assassinate an opposition figure who holds a minuscule 2% support amongst the population, far behind other opponents nonexistent to Western media, but the one who just so happens to be favored by Washington, is contrary to any reason or common sense.
Not to mention, at the exact moment it would jeopardize a project essential to Russia’s economic growth and frugality, as the pipeline would link Moscow with Western Europe bypassing neighboring transit countries such as the Ukraine (also opposed to Nord Stream 2) which have costly transit fees.
Is it really the Russian government who stands to massively benefit from this fiasco?
The answer to “cui bono?” could not be more clear: US, Saudi and Emirati oil and gas interests, not the Kremlin. Russia was also recently the first nation to develop a COVID-19 vaccine candidate with its Sputnik V registered in August, an international competition that has been heavily politicized by Washington which is eager to cast aspersions on Moscow’s accomplishment.
Meanwhile, Germany is also the one Western European country where Washington’s anti-Russian propaganda is falling flat, as recent polls consistently show that the vast majority of Germans don’t see Russia as a threat, likely a result of their high rate of media literacy.. . . "
So here Trump is, trying to negotiate a fair peace and a multi-polar world of coexistence, and you are repeating war propaganda that only benefits the military-industrial-complex.
. . . what do you have to gain from war? Invested in those companies are you?
