Trump is literally creating a military junta

[JQPublic1]

....The Electoral College hasn't voted yet. And ,from what I hear and see in the media, come December 19, Trump just might not win the Electoral college vote either.

Do you have a problem with the phrase "Hillary won the popular VOTE? Well, if so take it up with the authors of these links. I amView attachment 101471 View attachment 101471 through with your dumb ass:

You can keep your fingers crossed on that one, but even President Obama and Hillary have congratulated Trump on the win and are planning for January's inauguration.

As proved previously, saying "Hillary won the popular vote" is more spin than fact.

This has been a strange election year so there may be stranger things to come. Obama and Hillary had no choice but to be conciliatory after falling into Trump's debate trap where Hillary and Obama denounced Trump's insistence that the election was rigged. They also publicly admonished him for saying he wouldn't accept the results if he lost. Hillary can't backtrack now and do what she insisted Trump shouldn't do!

And, as I clarified, Hillary won more of the popular vote than did TRUMP. Trump has no mandate.

 

[sartre play]

No science in my back ground, so I don't talk about global warming. But I do have eyes, we are letting big money ruin the air, the water, the soil. lets work on that.

 

[kaz]

The popular vote would be relevant if they ... hello ... ran for the popular vote. Why did Hillary campaign in close States if she thinks it's irrelevant to the vote and they'd vote the same way anyway? Are you calling Hillary stupid?

The popular votes in battleground states determines the electoral votes in those states, fool. You are getting caught up in semantics.

I am? No ... you're being an idiot. No one ran for the popular vote, yet you're going on about your butt hurt that Hillary won that. In the big blue States, Democrats are a well oiled machine and there are tens of millions of Republicans with no reason to bother voting for President.

The national popular vote is irrelevant, you're just another Democrat partisan hack. No one ran to win the popular vote and the campaigns and who would show up would be completely different

I haven't said either candidate was running for the popular vote, you despicable nitwit.
You keep projecting the notion that I said something that I did not say. I merely said Hillary won the popular vote. Winning it doesn't mean she was "running" for it, stupid.
But it does indicate that most Americans wanted Hilary to be president. We all know a presidential candidate is running to be the first to get 270 electoral votes but that doesn't make the popular vote irrelevant. The margin of victory in every states always depends on the popular vote. when people register to vote and their votes are suppressed or not counted, the relevancy becomes readily apparent.

Hillary did not get "most" votes, that's a lie. She got more popular votes than Trump, but more people voted against her than for her.

And who won the national popular vote is irrelevant. It isn't how our elections work and it's not what candidates campaign for. It's just your butt hurt that Hillary lost

Hillary DID get the most votes in the general election you stoopid jerk. The Electoral College hasn't voted yet. And ,from what I hear and see in the media, come December 19, Trump just might not win the Electoral college vote either.

Do you have a problem with the phrase "Hillary won the popular VOTE? Well, if so take it up with the authors of these links. I amView attachment 101471 View attachment 101471 through with your dumb ass:

Being stupid as shit you'll never understand this, but for the sake of others reading this.

Hillary got more votes than Trump overall, however, she did not get a majority of the votes, she got a plurality. How stupid are you?

 

[JQPublic1]

The popular votes in battleground states determines the electoral votes in those states, fool. You are getting caught up in semantics.

I am? No ... you're being an idiot. No one ran for the popular vote, yet you're going on about your butt hurt that Hillary won that. In the big blue States, Democrats are a well oiled machine and there are tens of millions of Republicans with no reason to bother voting for President.

The national popular vote is irrelevant, you're just another Democrat partisan hack. No one ran to win the popular vote and the campaigns and who would show up would be completely different

I haven't said either candidate was running for the popular vote, you despicable nitwit.
You keep projecting the notion that I said something that I did not say. I merely said Hillary won the popular vote. Winning it doesn't mean she was "running" for it, stupid.
But it does indicate that most Americans wanted Hilary to be president. We all know a presidential candidate is running to be the first to get 270 electoral votes but that doesn't make the popular vote irrelevant. The margin of victory in every states always depends on the popular vote. when people register to vote and their votes are suppressed or not counted, the relevancy becomes readily apparent.

Hillary did not get "most" votes, that's a lie. She got more popular votes than Trump, but more people voted against her than for her.

And who won the national popular vote is irrelevant. It isn't how our elections work and it's not what candidates campaign for. It's just your butt hurt that Hillary lost

Hillary DID get the most votes in the general election you stoopid jerk. The Electoral College hasn't voted yet. And ,from what I hear and see in the media, come December 19, Trump just might not win the Electoral college vote either.

Do you have a problem with the phrase "Hillary won the popular VOTE? Well, if so take it up with the authors of these links. I amView attachment 101471 View attachment 101471 through with your dumb ass:

Being stupid as shit you'll never understand this, but for the sake of others reading this.

Hillary got more votes than Trump overall, however, she did not get a majority of the votes, she got a plurality. How stupid are you?

When a moron like you calls someone stupid its because that other brain cell is sputtering and gives you more confidence when your inane tautology becomes redundant.

I clarified my position in post #261. as I said then and you are saying NOW, Hillary got more of the popular vote than did TRUMP, about 2.6 million votes more. My point from the beginning is that Hillary got more votes in the general election than did Trump. And further if all the votes not counted due to Cross check and other GOP criminal activity were added, we wouldn't even be having this conversation, you stupid jerk!

 

[kaz]

I am? No ... you're being an idiot. No one ran for the popular vote, yet you're going on about your butt hurt that Hillary won that. In the big blue States, Democrats are a well oiled machine and there are tens of millions of Republicans with no reason to bother voting for President.

The national popular vote is irrelevant, you're just another Democrat partisan hack. No one ran to win the popular vote and the campaigns and who would show up would be completely different

I haven't said either candidate was running for the popular vote, you despicable nitwit.
You keep projecting the notion that I said something that I did not say. I merely said Hillary won the popular vote. Winning it doesn't mean she was "running" for it, stupid.
But it does indicate that most Americans wanted Hilary to be president. We all know a presidential candidate is running to be the first to get 270 electoral votes but that doesn't make the popular vote irrelevant. The margin of victory in every states always depends on the popular vote. when people register to vote and their votes are suppressed or not counted, the relevancy becomes readily apparent.

Hillary did not get "most" votes, that's a lie. She got more popular votes than Trump, but more people voted against her than for her.

And who won the national popular vote is irrelevant. It isn't how our elections work and it's not what candidates campaign for. It's just your butt hurt that Hillary lost

Hillary DID get the most votes in the general election you stoopid jerk. The Electoral College hasn't voted yet. And ,from what I hear and see in the media, come December 19, Trump just might not win the Electoral college vote either.

Do you have a problem with the phrase "Hillary won the popular VOTE? Well, if so take it up with the authors of these links. I amView attachment 101471 View attachment 101471 through with your dumb ass:

Being stupid as shit you'll never understand this, but for the sake of others reading this.

Hillary got more votes than Trump overall, however, she did not get a majority of the votes, she got a plurality. How stupid are you?

When a moron like you calls someone stupid its because that other brain cell is sputtering and gives you more confidence when your inane tautology becomes redundant.

I clarified my position in post #261. as I said then and you are saying NOW, Hillary got more of the popular vote than did TRUMP, about 2.6 million votes more. My point from the beginning is that Hillary got more votes in the general election than did Trump. And further if all the votes not counted due to Cross check and other GOP criminal activity, we wouldn't even be having this conversation, you stupid jerk!

Yes, your statements constantly contradict each other. Focus.

Hillary got a plurality of votes.

Hillary did not get a majority of votes.

It's not that hard. Look up the words and memorize the definitions. Write it down if you need to

 

[JQPublic1]

I haven't said either candidate was running for the popular vote, you despicable nitwit.
You keep projecting the notion that I said something that I did not say. I merely said Hillary won the popular vote. Winning it doesn't mean she was "running" for it, stupid.
But it does indicate that most Americans wanted Hilary to be president. We all know a presidential candidate is running to be the first to get 270 electoral votes but that doesn't make the popular vote irrelevant. The margin of victory in every states always depends on the popular vote. when people register to vote and their votes are suppressed or not counted, the relevancy becomes readily apparent.

Hillary did not get "most" votes, that's a lie. She got more popular votes than Trump, but more people voted against her than for her.

And who won the national popular vote is irrelevant. It isn't how our elections work and it's not what candidates campaign for. It's just your butt hurt that Hillary lost

Hillary DID get the most votes in the general election you stoopid jerk. The Electoral College hasn't voted yet. And ,from what I hear and see in the media, come December 19, Trump just might not win the Electoral college vote either.

Do you have a problem with the phrase "Hillary won the popular VOTE? Well, if so take it up with the authors of these links. I amView attachment 101471 View attachment 101471 through with your dumb ass:

Being stupid as shit you'll never understand this, but for the sake of others reading this.

Hillary got more votes than Trump overall, however, she did not get a majority of the votes, she got a plurality. How stupid are you?

When a moron like you calls someone stupid its because that other brain cell is sputtering and gives you more confidence when your inane tautology becomes redundant.

I clarified my position in post #261. as I said then and you are saying NOW, Hillary got more of the popular vote than did TRUMP, about 2.6 million votes more. My point from the beginning is that Hillary got more votes in the general election than did Trump. And further if all the votes not counted due to Cross check and other GOP criminal activity, we wouldn't even be having this conversation, you stupid jerk!

Yes, your statements constantly contradict each other. Focus.

Hillary got a plurality of votes.

Hillary did not get a majority of votes.

It's not that hard. Look up the words and memorize the definitions. Write it down if you need to

Now you are just being silly... bye....

 

[2aguy]

Trump hires a third general, raising concerns about heavy military influence
Trump Is Filling His Cabinet with Former Generals
‘Trump junta’: third retired general named to cabinet, raising concerns about military influence in new administration

He picked former generals for National Security Advisor, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of Homeland Security? He's literally Castro except a bad guy. We need to abolish the Electoral College and instate Hillary as POTUS immediately to save the Republic from the results of this election. The more Republicans try to stall and point to the "Constitution" the more they risk riots against the forming Orwellian hell state. What's next? He's going to put another general in charge of the VA? What a bastard.

Yeah...except those are American military men...who have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States you moron.......he put Generals in charge of security positions because they have the experience in fighting and waging war against our enemies you stupid dope......

Left wingers use the military to murder citizens.....Conservatives/Americans put Generals in charge to protect the citizens idiot.....

Er. so...who is in charge of the military when the military is "murdering citizens.?" Let me guess///OHHHHHOOO. It's generals!

No...it is left wing socialists.....moron. Your post is essentially saying the American fighting men and officers who killed nazis are the same as the nazis killing jews...moron....

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

 

[JQPublic1]

I wouldn't want to be.... I'm a fighter...I'd die on my feet fighting before I'd submit to your ilk!

What is it you think libertarians are going to do to you? Cut off your welfare? OK, yeah, we'd do that ...

You can't cut the welfare of a self made conservative man like me. I create my own. And what the heck is a libertarian? Even the dictionary gives an ambiguous definition that focuses on civil liberties. But, so far, you "libertarians" are all mouth and no action. You are one of those shadowy political ideologues that do nothing for anyone

You're a conservative?



As to your question:

What is a small government libertarian?

Hell yes, I am a conservative in every sense of the word. I am a law abiding citizen, a Christian, a military retiree, and a taxpayer. I am also self sufficient and owe nothing to anyone. BTW I used to also believe in the rue of law until I realized how fucked up it is here in the USA. Slager's mistrial in Charleston, NC is one of many examples of that!
The coy and cavalier attitude of RW Whites concerning the street executions of unarmed Black men is another. Racial murder defies YOUR brand of conservatism, it does not define mine!

Racial murder? Oh for God's sake...another idiot who buys the line of crap being put out by the main stream media that Police "target" blacks for execution with absolutely nothing to back that premise up?

You used the word "target" I didn't. I do know the KKK has infiltrated police agencie because there is no "test" for racism to join the force. I do know that unarmed Black males are shot and killed in disproportional numbers by cops and I do know that people like YOU are quick to point at Chicago and the national black on black murder rate to justify cops shooting unarmed Blacks.

 

[2aguy]

What is it you think libertarians are going to do to you? Cut off your welfare? OK, yeah, we'd do that ...

You can't cut the welfare of a self made conservative man like me. I create my own. And what the heck is a libertarian? Even the dictionary gives an ambiguous definition that focuses on civil liberties. But, so far, you "libertarians" are all mouth and no action. You are one of those shadowy political ideologues that do nothing for anyone

You're a conservative?



As to your question:

What is a small government libertarian?

Hell yes, I am a conservative in every sense of the word. I am a law abiding citizen, a Christian, a military retiree, and a taxpayer. I am also self sufficient and owe nothing to anyone. BTW I used to also believe in the rue of law until I realized how fucked up it is here in the USA. Slager's mistrial in Charleston, NC is one of many examples of that!
The coy and cavalier attitude of RW Whites concerning the street executions of unarmed Black men is another. Racial murder defies YOUR brand of conservatism, it does not define mine!

Racial murder? Oh for God's sake...another idiot who buys the line of crap being put out by the main stream media that Police "target" blacks for execution with absolutely nothing to back that premise up?

You used the word "target" I didn't. I do know the KKK has infiltrated police agencie because there is no "test" for racism to join the force. I do know that unarmed Black males are shot and killed in disproportional numbers by cops and I do know that people like YOU are quick to point at Chicago and the national black on black murder rate to justify cops shooting unarmed Blacks.

Do you pretend to be stupid...or are you really this stupid. There is a saying that there are more FBI infiltrators in the kkk than there are kkk members....police actually kill more white men than they do blacks....

We point out the black on black murder rate to show that the democrats only care about blacks every two years......and don't care about actual black murder because if they did...they would try to stop blacks murdering blacks instead of caring only if a white kills a black....

 

[JQPublic1]

Trump hires a third general, raising concerns about heavy military influence
Trump Is Filling His Cabinet with Former Generals
‘Trump junta’: third retired general named to cabinet, raising concerns about military influence in new administration

He picked former generals for National Security Advisor, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of Homeland Security? He's literally Castro except a bad guy. We need to abolish the Electoral College and instate Hillary as POTUS immediately to save the Republic from the results of this election. The more Republicans try to stall and point to the "Constitution" the more they risk riots against the forming Orwellian hell state. What's next? He's going to put another general in charge of the VA? What a bastard.

Yeah...except those are American military men...who have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States you moron.......he put Generals in charge of security positions because they have the experience in fighting and waging war against our enemies you stupid dope......

Left wingers use the military to murder citizens.....Conservatives/Americans put Generals in charge to protect the citizens idiot.....

Er. so...who is in charge of the military when the military is "murdering citizens.?" Let me guess///OHHHHHOOO. It's generals!

No...it is left wing socialists.....moron. Your post is essentially saying the American fighting men and officers who killed nazis are the same as the nazis killing jews...moron....

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

So Democrats can't be conservative? Hell, Southern Democrats were the MOST conservative of all. Are you saying Forrest was a liberal? What an idiot.

So all you can do is grunt "the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war?" Considering that firebombing was meant to impact the greatest number of civilian casualties, your remark seems to have lost its potency. BTW other cities including Hamburg , Germany ,also were firebombed.

There is little difference betweenDemocrat and Republican conservatives in modern times. But Trump has been both.

A plain clarification of his position on a number of social issues is unclear. He is a maverick populist like Hitler with all the qualities and character markers of a dictator...a vindictive racist dictator.

HIs unprecedented selection of Generals suggests he wishes to militarize the government. That bold nefarious prediction is all too evident for those looking with the third eye and listening with the third ear!

 

[2aguy]

Yeah...except those are American military men...who have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States you moron.......he put Generals in charge of security positions because they have the experience in fighting and waging war against our enemies you stupid dope......

Left wingers use the military to murder citizens.....Conservatives/Americans put Generals in charge to protect the citizens idiot.....

Er. so...who is in charge of the military when the military is "murdering citizens.?" Let me guess///OHHHHHOOO. It's generals!

No...it is left wing socialists.....moron. Your post is essentially saying the American fighting men and officers who killed nazis are the same as the nazis killing jews...moron....

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

So Democrats can't be conservative? Hell, Southern Democrats were the MOST conservative of all. Are you saying Forrest was a liberal? What an idiot.

So all you can do is grunt "the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war?" Considering that firebombing was meant to impact the greatest number of civilian casualties, your remark seems to have lost its potency. BTW other cities including Hamburg , Germany ,also was firebombed.

There is little difference betweenDemocrat and Republican conservatives in modern times. But Trump has been both.

A plain clarification of his position on a number of social issues is unclear. He is a maverick populist like Hitler with all the qualities and character markers of a dictator...a vindictive racist dictator.

HIs unprecedented selection of Generals suggests he wishes to militarize the government. That bold nefarious prediction is all too evident for those looking with the third eye and listening with the third ear!

And there you go conflating democrat slave holders and modern American Conservatives.....were democrat slave owners conservative..yes...they wanted to conserve slavery......

Are modern American conservatives conservative, yes, they want to preserve the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the principals outlined in the Declaration of Independence....the exact opposite of democrat slave owners....since individual rights and freedom are the core of modern conservatism.....

Also....racism was part of the democrat slave holder world view...and the view of the modern democrat party.....

American conservatives are not racists, don't care about race and don't cater to racists in the Republican party...the democrat party does....

He has no qualities even remotely close to the left wing socialist, hitler......Trump is not a racist, has never been a racist but your buddy obama is a racist, has always been a racist and is provable as a racist...he sat in a racist church for 20 years......

you are a stupid person.

 

[JQPublic1]

You can't cut the welfare of a self made conservative man like me. I create my own. And what the heck is a libertarian? Even the dictionary gives an ambiguous definition that focuses on civil liberties. But, so far, you "libertarians" are all mouth and no action. You are one of those shadowy political ideologues that do nothing for anyone

You're a conservative?



As to your question:

What is a small government libertarian?

Hell yes, I am a conservative in every sense of the word. I am a law abiding citizen, a Christian, a military retiree, and a taxpayer. I am also self sufficient and owe nothing to anyone. BTW I used to also believe in the rue of law until I realized how fucked up it is here in the USA. Slager's mistrial in Charleston, NC is one of many examples of that!
The coy and cavalier attitude of RW Whites concerning the street executions of unarmed Black men is another. Racial murder defies YOUR brand of conservatism, it does not define mine!

Racial murder? Oh for God's sake...another idiot who buys the line of crap being put out by the main stream media that Police "target" blacks for execution with absolutely nothing to back that premise up?

You used the word "target" I didn't. I do know the KKK has infiltrated police agencie because there is no "test" for racism to join the force. I do know that unarmed Black males are shot and killed in disproportional numbers by cops and I do know that people like YOU are quick to point at Chicago and the national black on black murder rate to justify cops shooting unarmed Blacks.

Do you pretend to be stupid...or are you really this stupid. There is a saying that there are more FBI infiltrators in the kkk than there are kkk members....police actually kill more white men than they do blacks....

We point out the black on black murder rate to show that the democrats only care about blacks every two years......and don't care about actual black murder because if they did...they would try to stop blacks murdering blacks instead of caring only if a white kills a black....

Do you pretend to be a racist moron are are you really a racist moron? Blacks know that, in general, nether White Democrats OR White Republicans have their best interests in mind. That includes YOU! Most Backs aren't killing each other by far. And for people like you to focus on that and not the good Blacks do, is racist. White people kill each other too..what are you dong to stop THAT carnage? why dies that seem invisible to YOU?

 

[2aguy]

You're a conservative?



As to your question:

What is a small government libertarian?

Hell yes, I am a conservative in every sense of the word. I am a law abiding citizen, a Christian, a military retiree, and a taxpayer. I am also self sufficient and owe nothing to anyone. BTW I used to also believe in the rue of law until I realized how fucked up it is here in the USA. Slager's mistrial in Charleston, NC is one of many examples of that!
The coy and cavalier attitude of RW Whites concerning the street executions of unarmed Black men is another. Racial murder defies YOUR brand of conservatism, it does not define mine!

Racial murder? Oh for God's sake...another idiot who buys the line of crap being put out by the main stream media that Police "target" blacks for execution with absolutely nothing to back that premise up?

You used the word "target" I didn't. I do know the KKK has infiltrated police agencie because there is no "test" for racism to join the force. I do know that unarmed Black males are shot and killed in disproportional numbers by cops and I do know that people like YOU are quick to point at Chicago and the national black on black murder rate to justify cops shooting unarmed Blacks.

Do you pretend to be stupid...or are you really this stupid. There is a saying that there are more FBI infiltrators in the kkk than there are kkk members....police actually kill more white men than they do blacks....

We point out the black on black murder rate to show that the democrats only care about blacks every two years......and don't care about actual black murder because if they did...they would try to stop blacks murdering blacks instead of caring only if a white kills a black....

Do you pretend to be a racist moron are are you really a racist moron? Blacks know that, in general, nether White Democrats OR White Republicans have their best interests in mind. That includes YOU! Most Backs aren't killing each other by far. And for people like you to focus on that and not the good Blacks do, is racist. White people kill each other too..what are you dong to stop THAT carnage? why dies that seem invisible to YOU?

Moron...most blacks are murdered by other blacks mostly because they have been raised for generations in homes with single teenage mothers.....that is the problem...not their race...twit.....it is the problem with almost all crime in this country...and the democrat party is the party pushing for the destruction of families....and dependence on the government which creates family breakdown....

 

[JQPublic1]

Er. so...who is in charge of the military when the military is "murdering citizens.?" Let me guess///OHHHHHOOO. It's generals!

No...it is left wing socialists.....moron. Your post is essentially saying the American fighting men and officers who killed nazis are the same as the nazis killing jews...moron....

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

So Democrats can't be conservative? Hell, Southern Democrats were the MOST conservative of all. Are you saying Forrest was a liberal? What an idiot.

So all you can do is grunt "the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war?" Considering that firebombing was meant to impact the greatest number of civilian casualties, your remark seems to have lost its potency. BTW other cities including Hamburg , Germany ,also was firebombed.

There is little difference betweenDemocrat and Republican conservatives in modern times. But Trump has been both.

A plain clarification of his position on a number of social issues is unclear. He is a maverick populist like Hitler with all the qualities and character markers of a dictator...a vindictive racist dictator.

HIs unprecedented selection of Generals suggests he wishes to militarize the government. That bold nefarious prediction is all too evident for those looking with the third eye and listening with the third ear!

And there you go conflating democrat slave holders and modern American Conservatives.....were democrat slave owners conservative..yes...they wanted to conserve slavery......

Are modern American conservatives conservative, yes, they want to preserve the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the principals outlined in the Declaration of Independence....the exact opposite of democrat slave owners....since individual rights and freedom are the core of modern conservatism.....

Also....racism was part of the democrat slave holder world view...and the view of the modern democrat party.....

American conservatives are not racists, don't care about race and don't cater to racists in the Republican party...the democrat party does....

He has no qualities even remotely close to the left wing socialist, hitler......Trump is not a racist, has never been a racist but your buddy obama is a racist, has always been a racist and is provable as a racist...he sat in a racist church for 20 years......

you are a stupid person.

We can sat here calling each other "stupid" all day and the very act of doing so means we BOTH may be right

Modern conservatives and liberals of both parties are responsible for the social conditioning that teaches our children at an early age that Whites are superior to Blacks. That paradigm persists regardless of the valiant efforts of some Christian Blacks and Whites to make a difference. Our system of White hegemony in so ingrained that Blacks can never, as a group, attain true equality. Individually ,yes. Still, the dumbest most ignorant White man thinks he is superior to the most articulate and educated Black man due to the aforementioned dynamic: social conditioning. But social conditioning also has a deleterious effect on the minds of many Blacks who were inculcated with negative images, statistical disparities, and the historical stigma of slavery. It is a miracle that so many have risen above it all.

I see that your obstinance can't be addressed. Your convictions are as rock solid as mine., right or wrong.. I only ask that you agree we both ought to be a bit more objective in our research and more respectful of one another. Good day!

 

[JQPublic1]

Hell yes, I am a conservative in every sense of the word. I am a law abiding citizen, a Christian, a military retiree, and a taxpayer. I am also self sufficient and owe nothing to anyone. BTW I used to also believe in the rue of law until I realized how fucked up it is here in the USA. Slager's mistrial in Charleston, NC is one of many examples of that!
The coy and cavalier attitude of RW Whites concerning the street executions of unarmed Black men is another. Racial murder defies YOUR brand of conservatism, it does not define mine!

Racial murder? Oh for God's sake...another idiot who buys the line of crap being put out by the main stream media that Police "target" blacks for execution with absolutely nothing to back that premise up?

You used the word "target" I didn't. I do know the KKK has infiltrated police agencie because there is no "test" for racism to join the force. I do know that unarmed Black males are shot and killed in disproportional numbers by cops and I do know that people like YOU are quick to point at Chicago and the national black on black murder rate to justify cops shooting unarmed Blacks.

Do you pretend to be stupid...or are you really this stupid. There is a saying that there are more FBI infiltrators in the kkk than there are kkk members....police actually kill more white men than they do blacks....

We point out the black on black murder rate to show that the democrats only care about blacks every two years......and don't care about actual black murder because if they did...they would try to stop blacks murdering blacks instead of caring only if a white kills a black....

Do you pretend to be a racist moron are are you really a racist moron? Blacks know that, in general, nether White Democrats OR White Republicans have their best interests in mind. That includes YOU! Most Backs aren't killing each other by far. And for people like you to focus on that and not the good Blacks do, is racist. White people kill each other too..what are you dong to stop THAT carnage? why dies that seem invisible to YOU?

Moron...most blacks are murdered by other blacks mostly because they have been raised for generations in homes with single teenage mothers.....that is the problem...not their race...twit.....it is the problem with almost all crime in this country...and the democrat party is the party pushing for the destruction of families....and dependence on the government which creates family breakdown....

See post #274

 

[2aguy]

No...it is left wing socialists.....moron. Your post is essentially saying the American fighting men and officers who killed nazis are the same as the nazis killing jews...moron....

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

So Democrats can't be conservative? Hell, Southern Democrats were the MOST conservative of all. Are you saying Forrest was a liberal? What an idiot.

So all you can do is grunt "the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war?" Considering that firebombing was meant to impact the greatest number of civilian casualties, your remark seems to have lost its potency. BTW other cities including Hamburg , Germany ,also was firebombed.

There is little difference betweenDemocrat and Republican conservatives in modern times. But Trump has been both.

A plain clarification of his position on a number of social issues is unclear. He is a maverick populist like Hitler with all the qualities and character markers of a dictator...a vindictive racist dictator.

HIs unprecedented selection of Generals suggests he wishes to militarize the government. That bold nefarious prediction is all too evident for those looking with the third eye and listening with the third ear!

And there you go conflating democrat slave holders and modern American Conservatives.....were democrat slave owners conservative..yes...they wanted to conserve slavery......

Are modern American conservatives conservative, yes, they want to preserve the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the principals outlined in the Declaration of Independence....the exact opposite of democrat slave owners....since individual rights and freedom are the core of modern conservatism.....

Also....racism was part of the democrat slave holder world view...and the view of the modern democrat party.....

American conservatives are not racists, don't care about race and don't cater to racists in the Republican party...the democrat party does....

He has no qualities even remotely close to the left wing socialist, hitler......Trump is not a racist, has never been a racist but your buddy obama is a racist, has always been a racist and is provable as a racist...he sat in a racist church for 20 years......

you are a stupid person.

We can sat here calling each other "stupid" all day and the very act of doing so means we BOTH may be right

Modern conservatives and liberals of both parties are responsible for the social conditioning that teaches our children at an early age that Whites are superior to Blacks. That paradigm persists regardless of the valiant efforts of some Christian Blacks and Whites to make a difference. Our system of White hegemony in so ingrained that Blacks can never, as a group, attain true equality. Individually ,yes. Still, the dumbest most ignorant White man thinks he is superior to the most articulate and educated Black man due to the aforementioned dynamic: social conditioning. But social conditioning also has a deleterious effect on the minds of many Blacks who were inculcated with negative images, statistical disparities, and the historical stigma of slavery. It is a miracle that so many have risen above it all.

I see that your obstinance can't be addressed. Your convictions are as rock solid as mine., right or wrong.. I only ask that you agree we both ought to be a bit more objective in our research and more respectful of one another. Good day!

No...they aren't...racism is the wholly owned property of the democrat party...they teach racism, all the time.....republicans don't care about skin color...democrats only see skin color. We don't have system of white hegemony, we have blacks in this country who give 95% or more of their vote to a political party that does nothing to help them, and yet buys the line that the other poltiical party is the problem....

I am more objective...that is why you are wrong and I am right.....

 

[JQPublic1]

No, I can use far better and pertinent examples. The Ft, Pillow Massacre, headed by rebel General Nathan B. Forrest involved wanton killing of Black civilians as well as unarmed soldiers.

Who was in charge when the firebombing of Tokyo occurred ?.... Generals? A lot of civilians went up in flames. And YAWNNNN! Surely you can't tie some general or generals to the big atomic blasts that killed hundreds of thousands of civilians...can YOU? Coming closer to home, a general must have given orders that caused the "Trail of Tears" march where so many Indian men women and children perished.

You must have a short head because you don't remember much! Idiot

Forrest was a democrat.....the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war....we aren't talking about the officers of a military murdering their own citizens as they do in socialist countries....Trail of Tears...funny, that was a democrat too......

So apparently we just need to keep democrats from appointing Generals...I whole heartedly agree with that....

So Democrats can't be conservative? Hell, Southern Democrats were the MOST conservative of all. Are you saying Forrest was a liberal? What an idiot.

So all you can do is grunt "the firebombing of Tokyo...really......it was a war?" Considering that firebombing was meant to impact the greatest number of civilian casualties, your remark seems to have lost its potency. BTW other cities including Hamburg , Germany ,also was firebombed.

There is little difference betweenDemocrat and Republican conservatives in modern times. But Trump has been both.

A plain clarification of his position on a number of social issues is unclear. He is a maverick populist like Hitler with all the qualities and character markers of a dictator...a vindictive racist dictator.

HIs unprecedented selection of Generals suggests he wishes to militarize the government. That bold nefarious prediction is all too evident for those looking with the third eye and listening with the third ear!

And there you go conflating democrat slave holders and modern American Conservatives.....were democrat slave owners conservative..yes...they wanted to conserve slavery......

Are modern American conservatives conservative, yes, they want to preserve the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the principals outlined in the Declaration of Independence....the exact opposite of democrat slave owners....since individual rights and freedom are the core of modern conservatism.....

Also....racism was part of the democrat slave holder world view...and the view of the modern democrat party.....

American conservatives are not racists, don't care about race and don't cater to racists in the Republican party...the democrat party does....

He has no qualities even remotely close to the left wing socialist, hitler......Trump is not a racist, has never been a racist but your buddy obama is a racist, has always been a racist and is provable as a racist...he sat in a racist church for 20 years......

you are a stupid person.

We can sat here calling each other "stupid" all day and the very act of doing so means we BOTH may be right

Modern conservatives and liberals of both parties are responsible for the social conditioning that teaches our children at an early age that Whites are superior to Blacks. That paradigm persists regardless of the valiant efforts of some Christian Blacks and Whites to make a difference. Our system of White hegemony in so ingrained that Blacks can never, as a group, attain true equality. Individually ,yes. Still, the dumbest most ignorant White man thinks he is superior to the most articulate and educated Black man due to the aforementioned dynamic: social conditioning. But social conditioning also has a deleterious effect on the minds of many Blacks who were inculcated with negative images, statistical disparities, and the historical stigma of slavery. It is a miracle that so many have risen above it all.

I see that your obstinance can't be addressed. Your convictions are as rock solid as mine., right or wrong.. I only ask that you agree we both ought to be a bit more objective in our research and more respectful of one another. Good day!

No...they aren't...racism is the wholly owned property of the democrat party...they teach racism, all the time.....republicans don't care about skin color...democrats only see skin color. We don't have system of white hegemony, we have blacks in this country who give 95% or more of their vote to a political party that does nothing to help them, and yet buys the line that the other poltiical party is the problem....

I am more objective...that is why you are wrong and I am right.....

I disagree!

 

[Divine Wind]

And, as I clarified, Hillary won more of the popular vote than did TRUMP. Trump has no mandate.

True. What good does that do her? Are you proposing a change? Let's open up the voting system for review. Any guess how the majority of Americans would vote in such a case???

 

[Divine Wind]

No...they aren't...racism is the wholly owned property of the democrat party...they teach racism, all the time.....republicans don't care about skin color...democrats only see skin color. We don't have system of white hegemony, we have blacks in this country who give 95% or more of their vote to a political party that does nothing to help them, and yet buys the line that the other poltiical party is the problem....

I am more objective...that is why you are wrong and I am right.....

Agreed and disagreed here.

Yes, absolutely the Democrats play and overplay the Race Card every ******* chance they get regardless of the truth. OTOH, while racists "of color" side with the Democrats, there's no doubt white racists side with the Republicans.

One thing we can agree upon is that the Republicans seek to dissociate themselves from the ******* racists dickheads in their party and the Democrats embrace their racists.

 

[JQPublic1]

And, as I clarified, Hillary won more of the popular vote than did TRUMP. Trump has no mandate.

True. What good does that do her? Are you proposing a change? Let's open up the voting system for review. Any guess how the majority of Americans would vote in such a case???

Discrepancies have been noted in several key stares such as new machines loaded with old data, people being turned away from polls even though they were ini line before closing time, elimination of voters with the same names via Cross Check, outright voter suppression and other republican crimes. Casting further suspicion on the GOP are exit polls results, whereas people are asked who they voted for. The numbers don't match with the results. That is very suspicious and ought to be looked into. Where is President Obama? If we ever needed jhim, it is now...to spearhead an investigation before Sessions takes over.