Trump is expected to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital and move the US embassy

[Humanity]

the most murderous religion on Earth.

Christianity?

In 2017 you're comparing Christianity to Islam?
Are you a ******* moron?

Just a realist and, unlike you, not drunk!

Want to tell me how many people have been killed by Christians?

Let me give you a clue.... It's more than 2!

 

[Indeependent]

the most murderous religion on Earth.

Christianity?

In 2017 you're comparing Christianity to Islam?
Are you a ******* moron?

Just a realist and, unlike you, not drunk!

Want to tell me how many people have been killed by Christians?

Let me give you a clue.... It's more than 2!

When?
Christianity and Islam were very competitive.
Not anymore.
So stop defending Islamic murderers.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

It will be fun watching the Palestinians act like Palestinians after this move is over.

Exactly what will it do for the US to move our embassy? What good will come from this other than giving a big **** you to the Palestinians?

That's good enough for me.
What's fascinating is that you think any of the Arab nations that won't let the West Bank Jordanians in really care.

It has to do with more than just the west bank. Jerusalem is a holy city for all the Muslim faith just as much as it is for Christians. Moving our embassy there will be taken as an insult to their religious beliefs, and since there is no other logical or reasonable purpose in doing it, they will be right.

Jerusalem is not a holy city to Muslims.
You really should so some research before exposing your ignorance on a topic.

Of course it is. Lots of information on this if you care to Google it, but I found something for you from USA TODAY because it's written for a lower grade reading level than most newspapers. I figured it might help you understand.

OK, if the Muslims transfer Mecca and Medina to Jewish control, then they can get a say about Jerusalem. Until then, no deal!

 

[Sixties Fan]

the most murderous religion on Earth.

Christianity?

In 2017 you're comparing Christianity to Islam?
Are you a ******* moron?

Just a realist and, unlike you, not drunk!

Want to tell me how many people have been killed by Christians?

Let me give you a clue.... It's more than 2!

It does not matter how many people Islam or Christianity have killed in this century.

Both have been in cahoots for the past 100 years to keep the Jews from continuing to be sovereign over their own ancient homeland.

Call them jihadists, nazis, neo nazis, communists, fascists, etc, etc.

Those groups, Muslim or Christian have only one aim.

To put the Jews back where they have had them for the past 1700 years. As dihmmis and begging not be be harmed or killed.

 

[Indeependent]

Exactly what will it do for the US to move our embassy? What good will come from this other than giving a big **** you to the Palestinians?

That's good enough for me.
What's fascinating is that you think any of the Arab nations that won't let the West Bank Jordanians in really care.

It has to do with more than just the west bank. Jerusalem is a holy city for all the Muslim faith just as much as it is for Christians. Moving our embassy there will be taken as an insult to their religious beliefs, and since there is no other logical or reasonable purpose in doing it, they will be right.

Jerusalem is not a holy city to Muslims.
You really should so some research before exposing your ignorance on a topic.

Of course it is. Lots of information on this if you care to Google it, but I found something for you from USA TODAY because it's written for a lower grade reading level than most newspapers. I figured it might help you understand.

OK, if the Muslims transfer Mecca and Medina to Jewish control, then they can get a say about Jerusalem. Until then, no deal!

Jews are not allowed in Mecca or Medina and Muslims should be banned from the Temple Mount.

 

[BULLDOG]

He told them to face Mecca when they pray. Do you think that means there are no other Muslim holy places in the world?

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Exactly what will it do for the US to move our embassy? What good will come from this other than giving a big **** you to the Palestinians?

That's good enough for me.
What's fascinating is that you think any of the Arab nations that won't let the West Bank Jordanians in really care.

It has to do with more than just the west bank. Jerusalem is a holy city for all the Muslim faith just as much as it is for Christians. Moving our embassy there will be taken as an insult to their religious beliefs, and since there is no other logical or reasonable purpose in doing it, they will be right.

Jerusalem is not a holy city to Muslims.
You really should so some research before exposing your ignorance on a topic.

Of course it is. Lots of information on this if you care to Google it, but I found something for you from USA TODAY because it's written for a lower grade reading level than most newspapers. I figured it might help you understand.

OK, if the Muslims transfer Mecca and Medina to Jewish control, then they can get a say about Jerusalem. Until then, no deal!

Also, when Muslims aren't too busy playing soccer on the Temple Mount, they can pray in their Dome. No one is stopping them. The only point is, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel.

 

[Indeependent]

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

Fascinating how no one at the UN contests this fact that you're wrong whenever Netanyahu brings this up.
Even members of the UN are more intellectually honest than you.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

Does Al-Masjidil-Aqsa mean The Furthest Mosque?

You do not understand what I clearly wrote.

The FACT that any mosque was built anywhere in the world, does not make that mosque a holy place in Islam. Much less the third holiest place after Mecca and Medina.

Why are Mecca and Medina important?

Why did the Temple Mount, all of it, suddenly became the third holiest mosque in Islam ONLY after Muslims lost the war of 1948 to the Jews?

Could you spend some time thinking about the above before you try to respond to it?

 

[BULLDOG]

He told them to face Mecca when they pray. Do you think that means there are no other Muslim holy places in the world?

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Which has what to do with Jerusalem?
Such a Liberal sucker for the Muslim cause.

The mosque In Jeruselem has had that name since it was a small prayer house, and was mentioned in the Koran as a holy place.

 

[Indeependent]

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Which has what to do with Jerusalem?
Such a Liberal sucker for the Muslim cause.

The mosque In Jeruselem has had that name since it was a small prayer house, and was mentioned in the Koran as a holy place.

You don't have a shred of proof. except for your deep respect for Islam.

 

[BULLDOG]

He told them to face Mecca when they pray. Do you think that means there are no other Muslim holy places in the world?

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

Look everybody!
A Liberal who has never studied religion because he hates religion is too embarrassed to admit such and is stretching his neck on the "Stupid Guillotine" to save face.

Any more bullshit, Bulldog?

I'm not sure why you might think I hate religion or have never studied it. Care to elaborate?

Look, you're surfing the Internet trying desperately to contribute to a discussion of which you obviously know nothing about.
The only time I have found you to be the least bit concerned about religion is now that the Muslims need you.

Not my fault if you aren't familiar with every discussion I have had.

 

[BULLDOG]

Exactly what will it do for the US to move our embassy? What good will come from this other than giving a big **** you to the Palestinians?

That's good enough for me.
What's fascinating is that you think any of the Arab nations that won't let the West Bank Jordanians in really care.

It has to do with more than just the west bank. Jerusalem is a holy city for all the Muslim faith just as much as it is for Christians. Moving our embassy there will be taken as an insult to their religious beliefs, and since there is no other logical or reasonable purpose in doing it, they will be right.

Jerusalem is not a holy city to Muslims.
You really should so some research before exposing your ignorance on a topic.

Of course it is. Lots of information on this if you care to Google it, but I found something for you from USA TODAY because it's written for a lower grade reading level than most newspapers. I figured it might help you understand.

OK, if the Muslims transfer Mecca and Medina to Jewish control, then they can get a say about Jerusalem. Until then, no deal!

Damn. You're just as intelligent and logical as our president. Accept my condolences.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Are you stupid?
One of the standards for a religion's holy place is to name it in your Scripture.
Jerusalem was a city of scorn for Mohammed, not adoration.

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Which has what to do with Jerusalem?
Such a Liberal sucker for the Muslim cause.

The mosque In Jeruselem has had that name since it was a small prayer house, and was mentioned in the Koran as a holy place.

The mosque on the Temple Mount is NOT mentioned in the Quran, at all. There is no mention of Jerusalem ONCE in the Quran.

Having the same name since it was built on top of a church, which had been built on top of Solomon's Temple, does not mean that it was ever "Holy" to Islam.

How Islam has treated that Mosque is proof of how important it has ever been to Islam, much less the "third holiest" site in Islam.

 

[BULLDOG]

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

Fascinating how no one at the UN contests this fact that you're wrong whenever Netanyahu brings this up.
Even members of the UN are more intellectually honest than you.

Credible link?

 

[Indeependent]

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

Fascinating how no one at the UN contests this fact that you're wrong whenever Netanyahu brings this up.
Even members of the UN are more intellectually honest than you.

Credible link?

You've never watched Netanyahu make a speech at the UN?
You believe the NT and OT is a fairy tale.
You believe the Koran is real.
I believe our discussion is over.

 

[Care4all]

Trump is the lousiest deal maker that ever existed on the face of this Earth...

He could have used this opportunity, to start a Peace process.... agreed to Jerusalem being the capital of Israel, but the Israelis would have to commit to building no further in to the Palestinian neighborhoods there in exchange for the USA support now, for Jerusalem as the Capital.....both sides would have given up something, yet gotten something in return and maybe ALL HELL would not break out in the middle east over this....

 

[BULLDOG]

"Exalted is He who took His Servant by night from Al-Masjidil-Haram (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الـحَـرام‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Sacred") to Al-Masjidil-Aqsa (Arabic: الـمَـسـجـدِ الأَقـصى‎, "The Place-of-Prostration The Farthest"), whose surroundings We have blessed, to show him of Our signs. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Seeing."

— Qur'an, Sura 17 (Al-Is'ra), ayat 1[3]

Again, same place, different name.

It wasn't until after 1948 or 1967 that some Muslims decided that that "furthest place" would be the Temple Mount.

Not the same place, different name.

Why does it have to take 1300 years for Muslims to decide that the Temple Mount would be the one mentioned in that Sura?

No. It has been called Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it as first built.

The mosque was originally a small prayer house built by Umar the second caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate, but was rebuilt and expanded by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik and finished by his son al-Walid in 705 CE. The mosque was completely destroyed by an earthquake in 746 and rebuilt by the Abbasid caliph al-Mansur in 754. His successor al-Mahdi rebuilt it again in 780. Another earthquake destroyed most of al-Aqsa in 1033, but two years later the Fatimid caliph Ali az-Zahir built another mosque which has stood to the present day.

Regardless of what it was called when first built, it has never, NEVER been considered to be a holy site for Islam, and much less the THIRD holiest site in Islam.

Thank you. It's now clear that you don't accept historical documents, at least as old as the King James Bible, as accurate. The mosque at Jerusalem has been consistently known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa for thousands of years. There is no need in discussing this subject with you beyond this point.

Does Al-Masjidil-Aqsa mean The Furthest Mosque?

You do not understand what I clearly wrote.

The FACT that any mosque was built anywhere in the world, does not make that mosque a holy place in Islam. Much less the third holiest place after Mecca and Medina.

Why are Mecca and Medina important?

Why did the Temple Mount, all of it, suddenly became the third holiest mosque in Islam ONLY after Muslims lost the war of 1948 to the Jews?

Could you spend some time thinking about the above before you try to respond to it?

For about th millionth time. The mosque in Jerusalem has been known as Al-Masjidil-Aqsa since it was first built. It is mentioned in the Koran. What more do you expect?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Trump is the lousiest deal maker that ever existed on the face of this Earth...

He could have used this opportunity, to start a Peace process.... agreed to Jerusalem being the capital of Israel, but the Israelis would have to commit to building no further in to the Palestinian neighborhoods there in exchange for the USA support now, for Jerusalem as the Capital.....both sides would have given up something, yet gotten something in return and maybe ALL HELL would not break out in the middle east over this....

Which Palestinian neighborhoods are you talking about?

And how many times must Abbas and all other Palestinian leaders say a huge gigantic NO to any peace process for people to start believing them?

 

[Indeependent]

Trump is the lousiest deal maker that ever existed on the face of this Earth...

He could have used this opportunity, to start a Peace process.... agreed to Jerusalem being the capital of Israel, but the Israelis would have to commit to building no further in to the Palestinian neighborhoods there in exchange for the USA support now, for Jerusalem as the Capital.....both sides would have given up something, yet gotten something in return and maybe ALL HELL would not break out in the middle east over this....

Peace process?
Name 2 contiguous Arab nations that aren't engaged in hostilities.