Trump insults supremes

I don’t know, quote any of them saying “I don’t care about roe v wade”

What was different?
Barrett: “Roe is not a super precedent because calls for its overruling have never ceased, but that does not mean that Roe should be overruled. It just means that it doesn’t fall on the small handful of cases like Marbury v. Madison and Brown v. The Board that no one questions anymore,” she said.

Kavanagh: “It is important precedent of the Supreme Court that has been reaffirmed many times,” Kavanaugh said of Roe. “It is not as if it is just a run of the mill case that was decided and never been reconsidered, but Casey specifically reconsidered it, applied the stare decisis factors, and decided to reaffirm it. That makes Casey a precedent on precedent.”

Gorsuch: “Once a case is settled, that adds to the determinacy of the law. What was once a hotly contested issue is no longer a hotly contested issue. We move forward,” he added.

Uncle T: He went on to say he did not have “a personal opinion on the outcome in Roe v. Wade.”

Roberts said that overruling precedent like Roe is “a jolt to the legal system” and that “precedent plays an important role in promoting stability and evenhandedness.”

Now watch the excuses this boot licker comes with.
 
Why should I care that he has an issue with one of their opinions? Why is that something to get hear over??
Wow, so calling the SC Justices many of which you appointed unpatriotic, incompetent, etc., because they didn't rule in your favor is ok with you. They love you, you are the ultimate boot licker.
 
Barrett: “Roe is not a super precedent because calls for its overruling have never ceased, but that does not mean that Roe should be overruled. It just means that it doesn’t fall on the small handful of cases like Marbury v. Madison and Brown v. The Board that no one questions anymore,” she said.

Kavanagh: “It is important precedent of the Supreme Court that has been reaffirmed many times,” Kavanaugh said of Roe. “It is not as if it is just a run of the mill case that was decided and never been reconsidered, but Casey specifically reconsidered it, applied the stare decisis factors, and decided to reaffirm it. That makes Casey a precedent on precedent.”

Gorsuch: “Once a case is settled, that adds to the determinacy of the law. What was once a hotly contested issue is no longer a hotly contested issue. We move forward,” he added.

Uncle T: He went on to say he did not have “a personal opinion on the outcome in Roe v. Wade.”

Roberts said that overruling precedent like Roe is “a jolt to the legal system” and that “precedent plays an important role in promoting stability and evenhandedness.”

Now watch the excuses this boot licker comes with.
Excuses for what? How do any of those quotes prove your claim they “don’t care about roe”?
 
Wow, so calling the SC Justices many of which you appointed unpatriotic, incompetent, etc., because they didn't rule in your favor is ok with you. They love you, you are the ultimate boot licker.
I didn’t appoint anyone

I have no problem with a president expressing his disappointment with an opinion. It’s been common practice at least since Obama did it at his state of the union

Not sure why Trump should be treated differently now.


I do have a problem with threats against them, like chuck Schumer did.
 
Let us calmly discuss this.

Is there anything wrong with noting one’s fundamental disagreement with any SCOTUS ruling? No.

May a President carp about an adverse ruling from SCOTUS? Yes.

Is SCOTUS above criticism? No.

See Plessy v. Ferguson.

Sometimes they make awful legal decisions.

Congress can criticize the President. The President can criticize Congress. But, for some unexplained reason, it is improper to criticize SCOTUS?
 
Back
Top Bottom