Trump has dealt Russia a devastating blow. Deal for Ukraine’s minerals could effectively end the war

WAPO paywall but here's the article in total.

"The minerals deal negotiated between the United States and Ukraine is a devastating development for Russia. Indeed, it is in some ways more important than any peace deal President Donald Trump might negotiate to end the fighting. Once implemented, it will mean that Russia has effectively lost the war.

Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to conquer his neighbor. Instead, the United States has just gone into business with Ukraine — entering into, as the agreement puts it, “a durable partnership” with Kyiv to jointly develop Ukraine’s untapped minerals and other natural resources and pledging “a long-term financial commitment to the development of a stable and economically prosperous Ukraine.”

With this deal, the United States is now invested — literally, not figuratively — in what the deal calls “a free, sovereign and secure Ukraine.” That means the United States now has a massive financial incentive to help safeguard Ukraine’s independence. If Ukraine survives, the United States will stand to gain hundreds of billions of dollars; if Ukraine falls, we get nothing. After all, does anyone think that if Putin conquers Ukraine, he is going to repay the United States for the weapons we gave Ukraine to fight his troops? Of course not.

The deal creates “a Reconstruction Investment Fund” that will be jointly owned and managed by the two countries. Ukraine will contribute 50 percent of all revenue earned from the “future monetization” of all government-owned natural resource assets, including “minerals, hydrocarbons, oil, natural gas, and other extractable materials.” The fund will use this revenue to “invest in projects in Ukraine and attract investments to increase the development” of its natural resources, as well as “infrastructure, ports, and state-owned enterprises.”

Those who say Ukraine failed to win security guarantees in exchange for the minerals deal are missing the point: The minerals deal is a security guarantee. Trump has made clear that he is not going to send American troops to Ukraine. But with this deal, he is going to send something better: American workers, bulldozers and earthmovers.

“It’s a great deal for Ukraine, too, because they get us over there,” Trump explained during his Cabinet meeting Wednesday. “We’re going to be working over there. We’ll be on the land. And you know, that way it’s this sort of automatic security, because nobody’s going to be messing around with our people when we’re there.”

With the minerals deal done, Trump must now negotiate a peace deal that secures his investment by making sure the war ends — and never resumes. Ukraine’s minerals only have value to America if they are extracted from Ukrainian soil, processed and sold. If Ukraine does not have security, that won’t happen. U.S. businesses won’t be able to mine for minerals under fire from Russian forces and will not make long-term investment in Ukraine if they fear the fighting will resume. And if they don’t invest, American taxpayers won’t get paid.

Trump certainly knows that as soon as there is a peace agreement, China, Iran and North Korea will help Russia rearm — and that in time, Russia will reconstitute its forces and rebuild its defense-industrial base in preparation for a new offensive.

To stop that from happening, the United States needs to help Ukraine establish deterrence. And that will require allowing Ukraine to purchase the American weapons it needs to discourage Russia from ever restarting the conflict. The minerals deal creates a mechanism to repay the United States for the weapons we have given Ukraine over the past three years, but not for Ukraine to buy weapons in the future to defend our joint investments.

Jack Keane, a retired Army general, and I laid out a plan in these pages on transitioning Ukraine from an aid recipient to a defense consumer, and using frozen Russian assets and loans guaranteed by Ukraine’s natural resources to buy weapons. This will be critical if we want to ensure that the war never starts up again, and Ukraine’s resources can be developed for the benefit of both countries. This does not require a new agreement or action by Congress; the mechanisms for such sales exist under existing law.

But this deal is a critical step forward. Russia wanted to diminish Ukraine economically, politically and militarily. With this deal, Trump has enhanced Ukraine economically and politically. Now, to secure our new investments, the United States must enhance Ukraine militarily as well."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/02/27/minerals-deal-ukraine-russia/

Having a bunch of American companies over there rebuilding and doing business means Russia is less likely to make another attempt out of fear of drawing in NATO, but at the same time, there's no US troops on his doorstep (or, at least not in Ukraine), most likely in Poland.

Meanwhile, I'm sure Ukraine will be spending plenty of the money they get from trading with the US to buy American made military equipment to rebuild their military once the Uke midget is gone.

My fear is since Trump is not gonna be around forever and if the dems ever get in total power again we will see the same type of grift we did before, or worse, they will give the farm away to the Ukes.

I'm sure the MSM will complain that the price of eggs is still high. ;)








.
Hilarious

They're discussing a deal to negotiate a deal on the minerals. Whatever Shitler! claims as a victory will not lead to any digging.
 
One thing that is sort of a sticking point.....Russia occupies most of the region where the mining is so I don't know how that will work out.
 
Three years…….Biden and Harris fucking instigated the invasion you dumb vapid twat. What were their peace proposals? Send them billions and half of it disappear? Great plan inbred

You really are clueless about the conflict.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine began in 2014 with Crimean anexation and hybrid warfare in eastern Ukraine. It continued throughout Trump presidency. The negotiated peace deal were Minsk agreements that Russia consistently violated and was sanctioned for.

In 2022 once Covid-19 lockdowns eased up Putin descided that the hybrid war has stalled and went for full invasion, but the reasons for it were the same - Ukrainian path to EU integration.

None of that had much to do with something Biden did.
 
Last edited:
You really are clueless about the conflict.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine began in 2014 with Crimean anexation and hybrid warfare in eastern Ukraine. It continued throughout Trump presidency. The negotiated peace deal were Misk agreements that Russia consistently violated and was sanctioned for.

In 2022 once Covid-19 lockdowns eased up Putin descided that the hybrid war has stalled and went for full invasion, but the reasons for it were the same - Ukrainian path to EU integration.

None of that had much to do with something Biden did.
“I’d be ok with a minor incursion by Russia into Ukraine”
-Joe Biden-

Clueless twat
 
“I’d be ok with a minor incursion by Russia into Ukraine”
-Joe Biden-

Clueless twat

Again you show that don't understand anything.

Minor invasion would be Russia moving in their troops into already de-facto occupied territories. If Putin did only that, supposedly to defend LNR/DNR from Ukranian agression, then there would be no hot war to speak of and sanction response would be considerably different from what his full scale invasion caused.

Putin got everything Biden warned him about and then some after his Kiev blitz failed spectacularly. Immediate concelation of Nordstream II and other severe sanctions on Russian energy exports, arming of Ukraine by 51 country coalition led by the Biden administration.
 
Last edited:
This is exactly why Trump win in Nov is extending the war.

Russia would have no hope for any real gains with steadfast American support for Ukraine a Democrat administration would provide. With Trump everything is up in the air.

Absolute nonsense .
Your remarks show that like Left Pinger as another poster , you do not know what the Russian tactics have been , particularly in the last 18 months .
They have directly led to the UAF losing between 6-10 times the number of fighters and equipment that Russia has lost .
Kyiv committed another monumental blunder in August when they attacked in the Russian Kursk oblast .

That has cost them over 60000 fighters and weakened their eastern line which latterly has been over run .
Worse for them they now look as they are encircled and cut off in Kursk .

Meanwhile Moscow look as though they might cross the Dneiper which means they could now head toward Odessa which they have been bombarding for months to degrade their infrastructure and supply routes

No, your beliefs are wildly misplaced and with Russia controlling the air space and having up to ten times the UAF artillery power there is nothing NATO and the UAF can do .

They have no fighters , equipment or the right equipment
Trump and NATO plus every serious pundit has known for months that there is no possible way for Russia to be beaten .


Simple facts Not opinions or debatable sources
 
...in the last 18 months .
They have directly led to the UAF losing between 6-10 times the number of fighters and equipment that Russia has lost

Source
 
WAPO paywall but here's the article in total.

"The minerals deal negotiated between the United States and Ukraine is a devastating development for Russia. Indeed, it is in some ways more important than any peace deal President Donald Trump might negotiate to end the fighting. Once implemented, it will mean that Russia has effectively lost the war.

Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to conquer his neighbor. Instead, the United States has just gone into business with Ukraine — entering into, as the agreement puts it, “a durable partnership” with Kyiv to jointly develop Ukraine’s untapped minerals and other natural resources and pledging “a long-term financial commitment to the development of a stable and economically prosperous Ukraine.”

With this deal, the United States is now invested — literally, not figuratively — in what the deal calls “a free, sovereign and secure Ukraine.” That means the United States now has a massive financial incentive to help safeguard Ukraine’s independence. If Ukraine survives, the United States will stand to gain hundreds of billions of dollars; if Ukraine falls, we get nothing. After all, does anyone think that if Putin conquers Ukraine, he is going to repay the United States for the weapons we gave Ukraine to fight his troops? Of course not.

The deal creates “a Reconstruction Investment Fund” that will be jointly owned and managed by the two countries. Ukraine will contribute 50 percent of all revenue earned from the “future monetization” of all government-owned natural resource assets, including “minerals, hydrocarbons, oil, natural gas, and other extractable materials.” The fund will use this revenue to “invest in projects in Ukraine and attract investments to increase the development” of its natural resources, as well as “infrastructure, ports, and state-owned enterprises.”

Those who say Ukraine failed to win security guarantees in exchange for the minerals deal are missing the point: The minerals deal is a security guarantee. Trump has made clear that he is not going to send American troops to Ukraine. But with this deal, he is going to send something better: American workers, bulldozers and earthmovers.

“It’s a great deal for Ukraine, too, because they get us over there,” Trump explained during his Cabinet meeting Wednesday. “We’re going to be working over there. We’ll be on the land. And you know, that way it’s this sort of automatic security, because nobody’s going to be messing around with our people when we’re there.”

With the minerals deal done, Trump must now negotiate a peace deal that secures his investment by making sure the war ends — and never resumes. Ukraine’s minerals only have value to America if they are extracted from Ukrainian soil, processed and sold. If Ukraine does not have security, that won’t happen. U.S. businesses won’t be able to mine for minerals under fire from Russian forces and will not make long-term investment in Ukraine if they fear the fighting will resume. And if they don’t invest, American taxpayers won’t get paid.

Trump certainly knows that as soon as there is a peace agreement, China, Iran and North Korea will help Russia rearm — and that in time, Russia will reconstitute its forces and rebuild its defense-industrial base in preparation for a new offensive.

To stop that from happening, the United States needs to help Ukraine establish deterrence. And that will require allowing Ukraine to purchase the American weapons it needs to discourage Russia from ever restarting the conflict. The minerals deal creates a mechanism to repay the United States for the weapons we have given Ukraine over the past three years, but not for Ukraine to buy weapons in the future to defend our joint investments.

Jack Keane, a retired Army general, and I laid out a plan in these pages on transitioning Ukraine from an aid recipient to a defense consumer, and using frozen Russian assets and loans guaranteed by Ukraine’s natural resources to buy weapons. This will be critical if we want to ensure that the war never starts up again, and Ukraine’s resources can be developed for the benefit of both countries. This does not require a new agreement or action by Congress; the mechanisms for such sales exist under existing law.

But this deal is a critical step forward. Russia wanted to diminish Ukraine economically, politically and militarily. With this deal, Trump has enhanced Ukraine economically and politically. Now, to secure our new investments, the United States must enhance Ukraine militarily as well."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/02/27/minerals-deal-ukraine-russia/

Having a bunch of American companies over there rebuilding and doing business means Russia is less likely to make another attempt out of fear of drawing in NATO, but at the same time, there's no US troops on his doorstep (or, at least not in Ukraine), most likely in Poland.

Meanwhile, I'm sure Ukraine will be spending plenty of the money they get from trading with the US to buy American made military equipment to rebuild their military once the Uke midget is gone.

My fear is since Trump is not gonna be around forever and if the dems ever get in total power again we will see the same type of grift we did before, or worse, they will give the farm away to the Ukes.

I'm sure the MSM will complain that the price of eggs is still high. ;)








.
Hilarious fuckups!

Run the video from the Shitler! meltdown with butthole vance in the Oval Office.

Total disgrace to our country and the office of the president.
 

A bit late FAKE NEWS LOVER .
About 3 years late .

I made my sources 100% transparent and available to everybody else many moons ago
Here .
About twelve different ones .
Where were you then?

Frankly I have zero interest what you think or believe on this matter .
I have told you the existing position and what you make or do with that is of no interest to me.
You are just another FAKE NEWS American addicted to Legacy Media/MSM .
 
But wait

You fuckers have spent months telling us that no matter how much money we send to Ukraine… the war is a lost cause.


Now you tell us that more money will WIN the war
Money wisely deployed.

Just blindly shoveling money to a kleptocratic dictator won’t end the war. That just provides incentive for Zelensky to keep it going.
I’m thinking you people should be ignored.
That will be difficult for you.
 
One thing that is sort of a sticking point.....Russia occupies most of the region where the mining is so I don't know how that will work out.
There's a bunch of other areas with other minerals like titanium.....for one. Russia has the market on that in their own country.
 
Last edited:
We promissed them defensive assitance when they gave up their nukes, so when they are pleading for it we must keep our word, unconditionaly.

Did we? What did Barack Obama do in 2014, when Russia invaded Ukraine?
 
Did we? What did Barack Obama do in 2014, when Russia invaded Ukraine?
President Obama put sancations on russia which republic pols opposed.

What did shitler! do when russia kept pressing the war in Ukraine from 2017-2021?
 
President Obama put sancations on russia which republic pols opposed.

What did shitler! do when russia kept pressing the war in Ukraine from 2017-2021?

That's not "defensive assitance(sic)". Savvy?
So, Obama failed between 2014 and 2017. Got it. 👍
 
Whether this deal is real or not… it points out the fact that this war is not won yet. That given enough resources Ukraine can outlast the Russian aggressors
Remember that
 
Whether this deal is real or not… it points out the fact that this war is not won yet. That given enough resources Ukraine can outlast the Russian aggressors
Remember that
If it depends on resources, and his resources come from the U S of A, you would think he would have been more respectful in the White House meeting.


I guess he sees how disrespectful the media is to the voters’ choice and thinks he’ll be their hero if he is also.

Maybe MSNBC will send him resources?
 
He wants boots on the ground ala peace keepers.
He said security guarantees.
I sincerely believe his intentions are to draw NATO into war against Russia.
 
Did we? What did Barack Obama do in 2014, when Russia invaded Ukraine?

Yea we did. They gave away their nuclear weapons to Russia and were provided assurances of defensive assitance by US, UK And Russia.

When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 a diplomatic solution was saught and Obama led international santions on Russia that put it into a recession for two years (2014-2016).
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom