The kids are not criminals dumb ass. Why are you going to take the blame out on them?
And by the way, your enabler buddy down the street who hires illegals for yard work or farm work, or construction work, or cleaning work, and should I go on, doesn't seem to have a problem with them being here.
Let's cut out the bs shall we. At the end of the day, employers across this country want them in the chicken farms, dairy farms, produce fields, you name it. If illegal immigration were that much of an emergency, the enablers would have put a stop to it decades ago. That's the truth, and that's reality. You can bellyache about it all day, but the illegals aren't the problem, the enablers are. They aren't going to be here if the enablers just stop hiring them. You don't need a wall for that. They will go back on their own.
This has been a symptom in search of a problem, mainly because of hate, and nothing more.
You want to solve problems that don't exist? Fine! Arrest the enablers hot shot, because that is where your problem is.
But remember, the enablers don't see it as a problem, because the illegals are doing the work we won't do, while the enablers see profits. Stick that in your sock the next time you think you need to complain.
Your argument is old and tiresome and I've heard it all for years. If the enablers want cheap labor while we, the citizenry, bear the brunt of supporting tens of millions of illegals (the old Wal Mart complaint from the left) then let them
bear more of the cost of bringing people here from Mexico (to educate, medicate, adjudicate, house, etc.).
We'll see how much they like their "cheap labor" then.
What has worked in the past, the old Bracero program, would work again if we need manpower that much, which I doubt.
Give people a green card for a period of time and then pay them when they go back and collect their money in Mexico (minus reasonable living expenses). Families in Mexico could even deduct part of those wages for their expenses too.
Or is that too sensible?