Trump Fails As Food Stamps, Welfare and Medicaid Applications Tumble

[AntonToo]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.
.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

9/11 happened on Bush's watch, did you blame him?

 

[edthecynic]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

The economy's going better, more people have jobs. Nothing to do with Trump, it was a trend that was going to happen even if a monkey got elected to the White House.

It's the Obama economy stupid.

/----/ They stop counting people who gave up looking for work so the UE rate goes down. Missing Workers: The Missing Part of the Unemployment Story

Tramp is not counting them also, but you knew that already.

 

[Mac1958]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.

And I see you only used one line from my post. No surprise.
.

 

[AntonToo]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

You don't need to be partisan to KNOW that not everything in the world is run by a president. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

 

[Mac1958]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

The economy's going better, more people have jobs. Nothing to do with Trump, it was a trend that was going to happen even if a monkey got elected to the White House.

Obama encouraged people to have Food Stamp Parties.

 

[AntonToo]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the meat of the point you made dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

They should be credited or blamed for what they actually do or do not do in office...with some allowance for hard to quantify effects.

 

[Mac1958]

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

 

[AntonToo]

Please stfu with this brainless idiocy. There are impressionable kids around.

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

BS, I did not cut out anything like that, your ACTUAL POINT was that presidents should get credit or blame for whatever happens.

 

[edthecynic]

Obama encouraged people to have Food Stamp Parties.

LIAR!

 

[Mac1958]

I can understand how a hardcore partisan ideologue would be angered by the mirror.

If you don't like it, tough shit.
.

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

BS, I did not cut out anything like that, your ACTUAL POINT was that presidents should get credit or blame for whatever happens.

Um, no, it wasn't. It was quite the opposite.

Wow. This is the kind of distortion that takes place in the minds of hardcore partisan ideologues, both in terms of perceptions and thought processes.


Always fascinating to observe.
.

 

[AntonToo]

Dummy you don't need to be partisan to KNOW that world does not run by presidents. You just have to have two fucking braincells.

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

BS, I did not cut out anything like that, your ACTUAL POINT was that presidents should get credit or blame for whatever happens.

Um, no, it wasn't. It was quite the opposite.

Wow. This is the kind of distortion that takes place in the minds of hardcore partisan ideologues, both in terms of perceptions and thought processes.


Always fascinating to observe.
.

Then quote yourself saying the opposite.

 

[Mac1958]

Yes, I do know that.

Why did you only quote one line from my post?

We both know why.

You are what you are.
.

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

BS, I did not cut out anything like that, your ACTUAL POINT was that presidents should get credit or blame for whatever happens.

Um, no, it wasn't. It was quite the opposite.

Wow. This is the kind of distortion that takes place in the minds of hardcore partisan ideologues, both in terms of perceptions and thought processes.


Always fascinating to observe.
.

Then quote yourself saying the opposite.

It's made clear in the post. But we both know what you actually were doing.

It's not my job to spoon-feed you. I don't come here to monitor your emotions.
.

 

[AntonToo]

Because thats' the full point you made/ dummy.

NO, presidents should not get credit or blame just because they were around. Thats a stupid, uncritical standard.

Bush should not be blamed for 9/11, Obama should not be blamed for Great Recession, Trump should not be credited for decently mediocre growth numbers we've had for 6 years now.

Why, thank you for agreeing with me.

And I can understand how someone like you would go nasty & personal, even when you agree with me.

And you went out of your way to edit out the part of my post that illustrated my actual point.

Are you people genetically incapable of just being honest at this point?
.

BS, I did not cut out anything like that, your ACTUAL POINT was that presidents should get credit or blame for whatever happens.

Um, no, it wasn't. It was quite the opposite.

Wow. This is the kind of distortion that takes place in the minds of hardcore partisan ideologues, both in terms of perceptions and thought processes.


Always fascinating to observe.
.

Then quote yourself saying the opposite.

It's made clear in the post. But we both know what you actually were doing.

It's not my job to spoon-feed you. I don't come here to monitor your emotions.
.

If it happens under a President's "watch", the President gets credit or blame.

Both parties have played that ridiculous, dishonest, ignorant game for a long time now.

So, the jobs numbers? North Korea? Trump gets credit.

If things turn south, he gets the blame.

Yes, it's silly, but that's how low we've sunk.
.

My appology, I misread because you made exactly contrary point in other threads.

Anyway, Trump gets the blame for failing to deliver on bs promises.

 

[Bush92]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

This is a good thing

 

[Bush92]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

Prosperity, making America great again, elevates the status of Americans, making them less dependent on the govt / liberals...

...go figure.

Libs are freaking out at this new trend...which is bad for democrats but a good thing for America.

Democratic Party needs a victim class. That’s why they want train loads of illegals to come here from Third World countries

 

[Flash]

Trump is undoing much of the damage done by the Obama administration and the Moon Bats hate him for it.

The Moon Bat agenda to make America a socialist shithole had been put on the back burner for the time being and they can't stand it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The economy's going better, more people have jobs. Nothing to do with Trump, it was a trend that was going to happen even if a monkey got elected to the White House.

Actually a trend that started under Obama.

Yes it did, and Obama inherited an economy that was always going to get better unless something really bad happened.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

The economy's going better, more people have jobs. Nothing to do with Trump, it was a trend that was going to happen even if a monkey got elected to the White House.

It's the Obama economy stupid.

I'm not really sure what your point is here. However it's not Obama's economy, nor is it Trump's economy. The economy is far more powerful than any president.

Presidents actually seem to have more power to fuck things up. They're like captains on a ship. If you do your job well, the ship gets from A to B without major hiccups. Make a mistake and you could end up sinking it, but there's no real glory in there. You can't do better than getting from A to B.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Every liberals nightmare: Less demand for free stuff.

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

Welfare: Earlier this month, the government reported that enrollment in food stamps plunged by nearly 600,000 in one month. Is this part of a broader trend toward greater self-reliance?

The Department of Agriculture, which runs the food stamp program — officially called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — reports that enrollment in January was 40.7 million, the lowest it's been since May 2010.

In the months since President Trump has been in office, the number of people collecting food stamps plunged by nearly 2 million.

The same is true for welfare. Enrollment in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program dropped 12% last year, to reach 2.3 million.

Better still, the number of workers on Social Security Disability Insurance was down to 8.6 million in March — a decline of more than 100,000 since January 2017, and the lowest level since February 2012.

Food Stamps, Disability, Welfare, Medicaid Enrollment Plunges,

The economy's going better, more people have jobs. Nothing to do with Trump, it was a trend that was going to happen even if a monkey got elected to the White House.

Obama encouraged people to have Food Stamp Parties.

Right..... Do you really not have anything useful to add to this debate?