You claim hypocrisy for considering a violation of the Logan Act against Flynn but not Biden. Flynn's potential violation was obvious. I note, you have no clue who Biden spoke with AND what they spoke about.
For your edification, speaking with foreign leaders is not necessarily a violation of the Logan Act. It's what you speak about with them which can be in violation. And you just admitted, albeit unwittingly, that you have no ******* clue what they discussed.
You lose again, Fruitcake, because you're out of your mind.
Farouk you moron, the National Security Advisor is SUPPOSED to dialogue with foreign ambassadors, shit fer brains.
Now as for violating the Logan act, that would be this Nazi stooge.
{
In neither instance was Kerry representing the US government. On the contrary, he seems to have been doing precisely what the Logan Act expressly forbids: acting “without authority” and communicating with foreign governments “to defeat the measures of the United States.”
This doesn’t mean Kerry should be prosecuted, no matter how despicable his behavior — because, again, the law is a dead letter.
Not that that stopped the shrill calls for a Logan Act indictment of Gen. Mike Flynn for his post-election contacts with Russian officials, even though he was acting for an incoming president.
At any rate, it’s unlikely anything John Kerry’s done could influence Trump’s nuke-deal decision. We’ll find out for sure at 2 p.m. Tuesday, when the president says he’ll make his intentions known.
}
Lucky for John Kerry that no one has ever been convicted (or even prosecuted since 1852) for violating the 18th-century Logan Act, which bars private diplomacy against US interests. Because what th…
nypost.com