Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[Rambunctious]

Judges are confirmed by the US Senate, Trump was not.

And judges standing in the war of our presidents agenda, is because they first stand for the US Constitution, and the laws of the US, as their oath of office requires.

So somehow its unconstitutional to fire a government employee?... this is why its going to be over ruled... the judges who are resisting the people will lose in the end... they are just trying to slow Trump's roll... pathetic....

 

[kyzr]

Judges are confirmed by the US Senate, Trump was not.

And judges standing in the way of our presidents agenda, is because they first stand for the US Constitution, and the laws of the US, as their oath of office requires.

The Constitution gives presidents Article 2 powers, the judges don't have any power to overrule a president who uses his Article 2 powers. Roberts needs to make that clear.

Judges can't tell generals how to run a war
Judges can't tell NIH how to develop vaccines
Judges can't tell the Supreme Court how to rule
Judges can't tell Congress how to write laws
Judges can't tell presidents how to run the Executive Branch

 

[meaner gene]

So somehow its unconstitutional to fire a government employee?... this is why its going to be over ruled... the judges who are resisting the people will lose in the end... they are just trying to slow Trump's roll... pathetic....

The constitution gives the legislature the power to make the laws. And they made laws over it's employees.

Civil Service Reform Act of 1978

PL 95-454 (S 2640) OCTOBER 13, 1978 An Act to reform the civil service laws.

www.eeoc.gov

Section 4302.

Establishment of performance appraisal systems

"(a) Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which --,

"(1) provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees;

"(2) encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and

"(3) use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees;

 

[Failzero]

1959 is coming

 

[Rogue AI]

Now they are 'activitst' because they rule against the felon47?

No, they rule against the plain text of Article II.

 

[meaner gene]

The Constitution gives presidents Article 2 powers, the judges don't have any power to overrule a president who uses his Article 2 powers. Roberts needs to make that clear.

Judges can't tell generals how to run a war
Judges can't tell NIH how to develop vaccines
Judges can't tell the Supreme Court how to rule
Judges can't tell Congress how to write laws
Judges can't tell presidents how to run the Executive Branch

Let's start with: Judges can't tell presidents how to run the Executive Branch

If the president runs the executive branch in contradiction to the US Constitution, and the laws passed by congress, the judicial system can enjoin the president from breaking the law.
They won't tell the president how to run the executive branch, but they will tell him how he can't run the executive branch.

 

[kyzr]

The constitution gives the legislature the power to make the laws. And they made laws over it's employees.
Section 4302.
Establishment of performance appraisal systems
"(a) Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which --,
"(1) provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees;
"(2) encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and
"(3) use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees;

That law does not say the president SHALL. It uses words like "encourage" employees.

That law has no sway over Article 2 powers.

 

[Rambunctious]

The constitution gives the legislature the power to make the laws. And they made laws over it's employees.

Civil Service Reform Act of 1978

PL 95-454 (S 2640) OCTOBER 13, 1978 An Act to reform the civil service laws.

www.eeoc.gov

Section 4302.

Establishment of performance appraisal systems

"(a) Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which --,

"(1) provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees;

"(2) encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and

"(3) use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees;

They are going to be fired this just delays the whole process....

 

[meaner gene]

That law does not say the president SHALL. It uses words like "encourage" employees.

That law has no sway over Article 2 powers.

It only encourages employee participation, the rest is under the heading

"(a) Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which --,
(3) use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees;

 

[meaner gene]

They are going to be fired this just delays the whole process....

They may very well all be fired, but they have to be fired in accordance with the laws written by congress.

Until then, judges get to stop the executive branch from doing it wrong.

 

[Stann]

Judges are confirmed by the US Senate, Trump was not.

And judges standing in the way of our presidents agenda, is because they first stand for the US Constitution, and the laws of the US, as their oath of office requires.

The president is suppose to be upholding the Constitution too.

 

[jknowgood]

trump is the only tyrant we have. He loves to blame others for the very things he does.

Didn't Obama say, elections have consequences?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Impeach first ask questions later

Impeach them for what?

 

[jknowgood]

You are gas lighting. You hate every American who disagrees with you.

I say Trump is right, can we be friends?

 

[Rambunctious]

They may very well all be fired, but they have to be fired in accordance with the laws written by congress.

Until then, judges get to stop the executive branch from doing it wrong.

Many will take the deal offered because its a better deal than what is in the laws written by congress....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

This was evident in the WA democrat legislature's response to the SCOWA order re: McCleary--funding of public schools. The court ruled that the state's paramount duty was FULLY funding public schools as directed in the constitution. They levied a $100K/day fine against the state that would be applied to public ed. That was in 2015. Three years later, the state finally complied. Problem was, the fines were never paid. Congress holds the purse strings and they didn't fund the fine. So much for the courts.

I think you mean state legislature, don't you? Congress has nothing to do with state issues.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Maybe Trump can talk with some Senate committees and get some hearings going on possible impeachable offenses by the Judges the President believes are not upholding their office.

What impeachable offenses?

 

[meaner gene]

The president is suppose to be upholding the Constitution too.

The only enforcement mechanisms to have the president uphold the Constitution according to his sworn oath, is by the judicial branch (court orders) and the legislative branch (impeachment)

 

[meaner gene]

Didn't Obama say, elections have consequences?

Yes he did.
And the consequences of the latest election is increased food prices, increased unemployment, the stock market correction (10% drop).

 

[jknowgood]

Yes he did.
And the consequences of the latest election is increased food prices, increased unemployment, the stock market correction (10% drop).

Not even. 2 months in. Trump has lowered inflation. Lowered gas prices, working on ending the Russia war, and lowering interest rates. I know those things don't matter to you, but it does for working people.