Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[Edgetho]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax

A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against the Trump administration, blocking enforcement of key provisions in an executive order that would penalize Perkins Coie, the Democratic-linked law firm involved in the discredited Russia-collusion narrative during President Trump's first term.
Key Details:

Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee, ruled that Trump's order could cause "irreparable harm" to Perkins Coie, violating its First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights.

The executive order sought to revoke the firm's security clearances, prohibit government contracts with entities using its services, and restrict employee access to federal buildings.

Perkins Coie, which once employed Democratic election attorney Marc Elias, was instrumental in hiring Fusion GPS, the firm behind the debunked Steele dossier.

Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules

A federal judge on Thursday ordered federal agencies to rehire tens of thousands of probationary employees who were fired amid President Donald Trump's turbulent effort to drastically shrink the federal bureaucracy.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup described the mass firings as a "sham" strategy by the government's central human resources office to sidestep legal requirements for reducing the federal workforce.

Alsup, a San Francisco-based appointee of President Bill Clinton, ordered the Defense, Treasury, Energy, Interior, Agriculture and Veterans Affairs departments to "immediately" offer all fired probationary employees their jobs back. The Office of Personnel Management, the judge said, had made an "unlawful" decision to terminate them.

Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11
Federal judges issued 15 nationwide injunctions against the Trump Administration in February alone. In just one month, that's more nationwide injunctions than there were issued for the first three YEARS of the Biden Administration.

District court judges are out of control.

SCOTUS must rein them in.

Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to rein in lower court rulings that have prevented a ban on birthright citizenship from taking effect nationwide.
Judges should not be able to govern "the whole Nation" from their courtrooms by issuing universal injunctions that block policies across the entire country while litigation is pending, the administration told the justices in its application.

"District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs [temporary restraining orders] during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration," the application states. "That sharp rise in universal injunctions stops the Executive Branch from performing its constitutional functions before any courts fully examine the merits of those actions, and threatens to swamp this Court's emergency docket."

The Trump administration is not yet asking the justices to weigh in directly on the constitutionality of President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship. Instead, they ask the justices to limit the common practice of universal injunctions that "compromise the Executive Branch's ability to carry out its functions, as administrations of both parties have explained."

"These cases--which involve challenges to the President's January 20, 2025 Executive Order concerning birthright citizenship--raise important constitutional questions with major ramifications for securing the border," wrote. "But at this stage, the government comes to this Court with a 'modest' request: while the parties litigate weighty merits questions, the Court should 'restrict the scope' of multiple preliminary injunctions that 'purpor[t] to cover every person * * * in the country,' limiting those injunctions to parties actually within the courts' power."

The Trump administration's requests arise out of orders blocking the ban in Maryland, Washington and Massachusetts. Trump's executive order prevents children born to parents either illegally in the U.S. or on temporary visas from gaining automatic citizenship.

Several Supreme Court justices have previously expressed disapproval of lower court's use of nationwide injunctions. Justice Neil Gorsuch criticized what he called "a rash of universal injunctions" during oral arguments in a case on the abortion pill in 2024.

Benjamin Weingarten @bhweingarten
The Trump Administration is taking the fight to end universal injunctions to the Supreme Court.

"...[T]he government comes to this Court with a 'modest' request: while the parties litigate weighty merits questions, the Court should 'restrict the scope' of multiple preliminary injunctions that 'purpor[t] to cover every person * * * in the country,' limiting those injunctions to parties actually within the courts' power."

"...Universal injunctions have reached epidemic proportions since the start of the current Administration. Courts have graduated from universal preliminary injunctions to universal temporary restraining orders, from universal equitable relief to universal monetary remedies, and from governing the whole Nation to governing the whole world."

..."This Court should declare that enough is enough before district courts� burgeoning reliance on universal injunctions becomes further entrenched."

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump was elected... Judges are not... they had better remember that because its the courts that hold things together... when the people see the courts as an adversary that is standing in the way of our presidents agenda and what we voted for the courts will be completely ignored... what are they going to do?.... courts have no army or police force so Judges a warning to you... do not lose our respect... you are inching very close to that....

 

[kyzr]

The USSC needs to say which courts have the Constitutional authority to stop a president's Article 2 Powers, if any do.

 

[Edgetho]

Trump was elected... Judges are not... they had better remember that because its the courts that hold things together... when the people see the courts as an adversary that is standing in the way of our presidents agenda and what we voted for the courts will be completely ignored... what are they going to do?.... courts have no army or police force so Judges a warning to you... do not lose our respect... you are inching very close to that....

Too many Judges, maybe even most, are failed politicians. They're all lawyers and too many suffer from a Messiah Complex. Especially ones with lifetime appointments.

It's a Mental Disorder. But so is everything else dimocrap.

The messiah complex, also known as the savior complex, is a psychological phenomenon where an individual believes they have a special mission or calling to save, rescue, or help others

 

[Blaster]

Liberal judges want to destroy America.

 

[Edgetho]

The USSC needs to say which courts have the Constitutional authority to stop a president's Article 2 Powers, if any do.

The Judicial Branch is supposed to interfere with the Executive only on Constitutional issues.

Not because a certain Judge doesn't like OMB or what he's doing.

I'm telling you, we could be headed for a showdown. One in which the Judicial Branch would lose. Badly.

SCOTUS dropped the ball when OMB was being persecuted by out of control dimocrap scum persecutors and they're hiding now, when Activist Judges are WAY over-stepping their authority.

Judges are NOT supposed to be able to just award themselves power. The power can only come from The People and through the Legislative and Executive Branch of government. The Judicial branch is just there to shuffle papers. That's it.

They want to be 'Players' but they aren't supposed to be. The Country is going to be hurt over this.

I'm telling you, we could lose the Judicial Branch on the Federal level sooner than people think.

OMB has a Hard-On for the Judicial Branch right now and they better watch their asses.

 

[WEATHER53]

Checks and balances exist in the legislative branch because it takes many dozens or hundreds to overrule Trump. Judicial fiat tyranny just involves ONE Trump hater who doesn’t even hear Trumps side
Grotesquely wrong . That’s why grotesque people employ the tactic

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We have three branches of government, and each will stay in its lane.

Judiciary has the power of judicial review, which neither executive or legislative can restrict.

And part of that power is helping the executive to stay in its lane.

No choice.

 

[jc456]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

I've already posted, what's a judge gonna do if he doesn't abide? crickets.

 

[Blaster]

Trump controls the DOJ and the FBI and could ignore these liberal judges.

 

[WEATHER53]

We have three branches of government, and each will stay in its lane.

Judiciary has the power of judicial review, which neither executive or legislative can restrict.

And part of that power is helping the executive to stay in its lane.

No choice.

One judge is not a branch.

 

[kyzr]

One judge is not a branch.

That's why Trump needs to ignore them until the USSC makes a clarification.

 

[WEATHER53]

One judge is not a branch.

A branch is never the tree

 

[Stann]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

trump is the only tyrant we have. He loves to blame others for the very things he does.

 

[Edgetho]

trump is the only tyrant we have. He loves to blame others for the very things he does.

Right here, people.

No matter how much you hate the left.

It isn't enough.

Remember that. Always.

 

[Rogue AI]

Roberts has become the worst Chief Justice in our history. Others may have presided over terrible rulings, but only the Roberts' judiciary continually runs rough shod over the Constitution. Pathetic.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump was elected... Judges are not... they had better remember that because its the courts that hold things together... when the people see the courts as an adversary that is standing in the way of our presidents agenda and what we voted for the courts will be completely ignored...

Funny how these judges are blocking and finding unconstitutional every effort to reign in waste, spending and corruption, all of which benefit the democrat party.

No district judge has ever stood up for blocking the firing of anyone I ever knew before from being fired by their employer. Most jobs are AT WILL. You mean when the Fed hires you, they cannot fire you at will? Even if your job is no longer needed, wasteful, unproductive or corrupt?

 

[Rambunctious]

Funny how these judges are blocking and finding unconstitutional every effort to reign in waste, spending and corruption, all of which benefit the democrat party.

No district judge has ever stood up for blocking the firing of anyone I ever knew before from being fired by their employer. Most jobs are AT WILL. You mean when the Fed hires you, they cannot fire you at will? Even if your job is no longer needed, wasteful, unproductive or corrupt?

Its obvious what's going on... so If I can see it the justices on the SCOTUS can too... now they need to put an end to this...

 

[Stann]

Edgetho

Right here, people.

No matter how much you hate the left.

It isn't enough.

Remember that. Always.

You sold your country and your soul to trump and you actually believe that devil is going to give you something in return
He only takes.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump controls the DOJ and the FBI and could ignore these liberal judges.

A Democratic victory next year would become inevitable.

That would result in an impeachment and a possible conviction.

The wild card would be the military.