- Banned
- #41
Your own post was a deflection. Trump and major officials from his corrupt Mafia operation have endorsed regulating these company’s speech. So go suck a big ol’ cock.
Trump considering Sherman Act Violation investigation into Google and Facebook.
- Thread starter ColonelAngus
- Start date
Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
Limbaugh sells himself as a neutral news agency?
You Leftards are so pathetic in your excuses.
- Banned
- #43
2nd deflection in a row.Unless it’s a corrupt FBI official, then you Leftards scream murder.In most states you can fire somebody for any reason you want. Did you know, snowflake?
I guess you want big gubmint to regulate that too, huh?
Back to the topic; why do you want Trump to nationalize these organizations?
buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,888
- 7,486
- 1,130
Good, we need a free press and freedom of speech. Next take on the universities and their speech codes, start crushing this leftwing political correctness and book banning. Let people read Tom Sawyer and Catcher in the Rye again......
candycorn
Diamond Member
Explain how Google can prevent you from using it’s service….would you please?
jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 159,113
- 39,415
- 2,180
he wants them to abide by the license they applied and got. that's all. CNN is biased as shit, however, they are licensed as a news organization and are subject to slander law.2nd deflection in a row.Unless it’s a corrupt FBI official, then you Leftards scream murder.In most states you can fire somebody for any reason you want. Did you know, snowflake?
I guess you want big gubmint to regulate that too, huh?
Back to the topic; why do you want Trump to nationalize these organizations?
candycorn
Diamond Member
Conservatives lie far more often than liberals.
Trump is exhibit A. His supporters (re: you) are exhibit B.
buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,888
- 7,486
- 1,130
No, Rush says he's conservative, it's obvious, but he tells you that. so if CNN wants to say we're leftwing go for it, but they don't. And the reason is they want to control the public by pretending they are middle of the road and try and shape opinion with their stories and polls......we're on to the propaganda game they play.
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #49
Never suggested we nationalize them. If a Baker can be forced to bake a cake why can't Google be forced to comply with similar regulations?
- Banned
- #50
^
Nice little soapbox. Now tell us what big gubmint interventions you want Trump to impose on these private companies’ speech?
- Banned
- #51
Because the baker’s free speech was not part of the ruling. Where speech was involved, businesses have won lawsuits against gay people. That’s one of the most common bits of misinformation spread among conservative circles. The baker had every right to refuse any speech requested on the cake.
buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,888
- 7,486
- 1,130
First thing is to ban shadowbanning....have the balls to tell people they are banned^
Nice little soapbox. Now tell us what big gubmint interventions you want Trump to impose on these private companies’ speech?
Then tell them WHY they are banned
Then make sure the rules are applied evenly.
And if they aren't, then regulate them as monopolies......
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Google sells themselves as a news agency?
You statist are so pathetic
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
- Banned
- #55
Shadowbanning is nonsense conspiracy. And Facebook and Google have every right to do whatever they want with your account if you’ve agreed to their TOS and violated it.First thing is to ban shadowbanning....have the balls to tell people they are banned^
Nice little soapbox. Now tell us what big gubmint interventions you want Trump to impose on these private companies’ speech?
Then tell them WHY they are banned
Then make sure the rules are applied evenly.
And if they aren't, then regulate them as monopolies......
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,888
- 7,486
- 1,130
No shadowbanning does happen. And I'm all for terms of service agreements, but you need to be fair......and freedom of speech should hold, just like on this messageboard. As long as I don't attack family, threaten you or post porn or personal info, I should be ok, and that's what should be the case, not if you mock someone or say a mean word....Shadowbanning is nonsense conspiracy. And Facebook and Google have every right to do whatever they want with your account if you’ve agreed to their TOS and violated it.First thing is to ban shadowbanning....have the balls to tell people they are banned^
Nice little soapbox. Now tell us what big gubmint interventions you want Trump to impose on these private companies’ speech?
Then tell them WHY they are banned
Then make sure the rules are applied evenly.
And if they aren't, then regulate them as monopolies......
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #59
Laugh and point.
Retards always invoke Hitler when they can't argue the merits of a subject.
iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,929
- 1,600
unfortunately this isn't how it works. when people get "abused" they want justice and to force the behavior on others to comply. i'm like you in that you can go find something else to use or build a better solution.
but the way "people" work is to use the gov / laws to slow things down. working at Microsoft in the 90s and beyond showed me quite a bit that once they say you have an unfair advantage, look for regulations and being told how to operate next.
like it or not, it's coming.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
RepLuna has invited a member of the Moscow Bolshevik (communist party), Vladimir Isakov, to visit US congress.- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
Putin asks oligarchs to donate to budget as cost of Ukraine war soars
- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 1
-
-
Trump getting on coins and now his signature on bills- Started by frigidweirdo
- Replies: 45
