Anything you said?
Let's remember, you said" It got attention because you had a bunch of sex-obsessed Republicans repeating the most questionable accounts from bimbos like Jones, Willey and Brodderick, whose stories fell apart under the minimal amount of scrutiny."
You said nothing. Were proven wrong, with your only reply being 'huh'? Blubblubblub.
You refuted zip. Cause you cannot. Everything I said was spot on.
That was weak, and that's being kind.
Uh, guy, again, you really didn't make your case. So they paid Jones some money to go away AFTER she dropped her insistance Clinton apologize for what he probably didn't do. Frankly, it was kind of sad.
Clinton didn't admit to anything. That was the point. And Paula Jones herself has admitted that the people around her used her.
Paula Jones Reacts to Clinton Memoir
Hillary Rodham Clinton famously blamed the scandals that led to her husband's impeachment on a "vast right-wing conspiracy."
Jones told ABC News "Primetime's" Cynthia McFadden: "I agree that I was a small little entity in this big vast whatever-you-want-to-call-it that got erected."
She continued, "It started with me — and they did use me for their own agendas."
I didn't have to make a case, you made the assertion that their
"stories fell apart under the minimal amount of scrutiny."
That is demonstrably false and I did do that, in spades, for anyone that doesn't have their blinders on. I will, however, touch on those pesky little things called facts that you'd like to ignore one more time , then I'll touch on your latest failed attempt at obfuscation of those facts.
1. Clinton lied during his deposition for this case.
2. Clinton handed over 800 k to make it go away.
Nothing "fell apart". Done. He lied to dodge and then paid his way out.
But let's look at your cherry picked comment, which is nothing but another example of your repeated attempts to misrepresent the facts to support your position.
In the same article she also says
"She said she was shocked by Clinton's recent explanation of why he had an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Clinton told CBS' "60 Minutes" that he did it "because I could."
Jones said her first thought was: "Oh, my! He actually admitted that — and that's why he did that with me." (Jones' lawsuit accused Clinton of exposing himself and making a sexual proposition to her in an Arkansas hotel room.)
Jones feels that Clinton's motivations were the same with former White House volunteer Kathleen Willey and former cabaret singer Gennifer Flowers, who also accused Clinton of sexual misbehavior.
Flowers rocked Clinton's campaign for the Democratic nomination for president in 1992 when she announced to the media she had had a 12-year affair with the would-be candidate. Clinton later admitted her allegations were at least partially true.
"You know, he did it because he could," Jones said. "Because he used his power. So that's exactly my thought when he said that."
Jones also told McFadden she knew about the president's relationship with Lewinsky before his wife learned of it. One of Jones' lawyers confronted Clinton before the Lewinsky news became public, she said.
"I knew very little about her except she was an intern, that she worked in the White House … and that they had some relations," Jones said.
Her lawyers were interested in Lewinsky because they were trying to establish a pattern of behavior by Clinton, "so it would be more believable that he did do it to me," Jones said."
So, she at no point stated that what she said wasn't true, despite your latest attempt to discredit her to continue to support the pig.
Your own article provides more damnation than exoneration.
If that's the best you've got, and in reality it is, because you are defending a clear and proven liar and clear and proven serial sexual deviant, maybe you should just put that shovel down.