Trump Calls on Sessions to ‘Stop the Rigged Witch Hunt Right Now’

[protectionist]

Only Donald Dumbass would tweet obstruction of justice for the whole world to see. His tweets are admissions of guilt. All his denials are admissions. It is so obvious that he is like cornered crook, crying foul, before he falls to his knees and starts whimpering for mercy. Trump might as well have a stamp on his forehead that reads "Colluder".

Try presenting a shred of evidence with this rant.

 

[protectionist]

Of course he did.

How ?.... When ?.... Where ?

 

[protectionist]

How is he among women ,,the 35 and younger ,,,the black voters ? Fact is you try to put a dress on a pig It won't work

I'm not falsifying anything. Again >> Trump has 90% approval rate from Republicans. 50% from general public.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, none of the Trumpers deserve any consideration in aiding their continual drumroll of denial.

Trump is a shithead.

He is terrible for the country and its citizens.

He has obstructed justice.

His supporters will simply have to be ignored.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Will" is a future tense speculation word, nothing more

Republicans have said they would do this. That makes it a lot of speculative then you saying The Mueller team has nothing on Trump.

 

[protectionist]

And What did Trump want?
POLITICS ‘Crushing’ Russia Sanctions Sought in Bipartisan Senate Bill
The measure comes after reports of Russia’s ongoing efforts to sway U.S. elections.

The notion of Russia swaying US elections is nothing but a Democrat scam to deflect attention away from the massive Mexican swaying of US elections, with the actual capability of millions of Mexicans invading & occupying the US, and then voting in US elections.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump went along with the witch hunt folly

No he didn't. He asked comey to back off. When comey didn't, he fired comey. He tried to fire Mueller, amd failed.

Why do you people say such fecking stupid things? Are you high?????

No he didn’t

Trump fired Comey because he was mean to Hillary

 

[protectionist]

Nope, none of the Trumpers deserve any consideration in aiding their continual drumroll of denial.

Trump is a shithead.

He is terrible for the country and its citizens.

He has obstructed justice.

His supporters will simply have to be ignored.

Just saying that Trump obstructed justice is meaningless. It would have to be shown, and it hasn't.

 

[protectionist]

Republicans have said they would do this. That makes it a lot of speculative then you saying The Mueller team has nothing on Trump.

Republicans have said this and that. In the end, they all fall in line behind Trump and support him 90%. Ho hum.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Republicans have said this and that. In the end, they all fall in line

Except for when they vote unanimously in the Senate to rebuke him.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Correct. And unethical behavior on the part of a campaign. And Russian interference.

Now you're getting it!

By the way, the things you are complaining about are absurd. For instance, when a stock trade appears as though it may be fishy, the SEC investigates. When a campaign donation or expense appears as though it may be part of a crime, the FEC investigates. When a bank transaction appears as though it could be part of a crime, the FBI investigates. You are inventing, on the spot, absurd standards that you reserve for your dear leader. Nobody else observes this fantasy.

Its over dude....Mueller has nothing and even is being embarrassed in open court by Judge Ellis....Mueller's henchmen look like a high school debate team...Mueller stands a real chance of losing the case against Manaforte for lack of evidence and bias.....that's huge and that is why Trump is calling for an end to the whole destructive thing....

Its over dude...

It sure is. There aren't any excuses left.

 

[protectionist]

Pence, unlike Trump, will follow the law. Pence would not ban all Muslims, not even a significant minority, from certain countries. He would ban people like you from breaking the law to get at people they don't like. AA would survive. Who cares about CCW law? And Pence would recognize Islam is a protected religion in America.

1. You contradict yourself. If Pence would follow the law (US Constitution Article 6, section 2, Part 1 - the Supremacy Clause), then Pence would be compelled to ban ALL Muslims from entering the US (SCOTUS will uphold it again), and would declare Islam not a religion as Trump told the Italian President he may do in the near future (Italy already has).

2. I don't break any laws, and have good track record to prove it. Am 72 years old. Never been arrested.

3. Pence was part of the current drive to diminish AA. They're still working on it.

4. Lots of people care about CCW law.

 

[JakeStarkey]

1. Your understanding of the law is not what the law is about.

2. You would not be allowed to break the law.

3. Pence will not get involved with AA.

4. CCW is unimportant, and Pence does not care.

5. And in the end Muslims can thumb their noses at you, and you can't do a thing about it.

The ruling upheld that countries can have its citizens banned and vetted before entering the USA. This is the old Carter ruling. It says nothing about Muslims, because it can't.

 

[protectionist]

Except for when they vote unanimously in the Senate to rebuke him.

That's like saying when Hillary wins the 2016 election.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, it is not. Next.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Except for when they vote unanimously in the Senate to rebuke him.

That's like saying when Hillary wins the 2016 election.

Except the Senate has already done this, while Hillary did not win the 2016 election. So, if by "like" you meant "exactly the opposite of"...then yeah, good point!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It was inevitable from day one. Trump can’t keep himself from doing stuff that’s both stupid and illegal. He’s been doing it all of his working life.

Trump has been openly and intentionally obstructing justice in the Russian investigation.

Trump has been obstructing the institution of sanctions against Russia and has openly adopted the Russian narrative on NATO.

When Trump was first elected, one of my Washington friends was told by a high ranking Republican senator that they were going to extend Trump enough rope to hang himself while getting the tax cuts and other stuff they want, and then throw him under the bus before the Midterms, telling the American public that Republicans saved them from Trump so they shouldn’t be thrown out of office.

Looks right we’re only slightly behind schedule in that.

Trump has 90% approval rate from Republicans. 50% from general public.

Republicans make up 27% of voters so saying he has 90% of them is not saying much.

 

[protectionist]

1. Your understanding of the law is not what the law is about.

2. You would not be allowed to break the law.

3. Pence will not get involved with AA.

4. CCW is unimportant, and Pence does not care.

5. And in the end Muslims can thumb their noses at you, and you can't do a thing about it.

1. I'm not talking about breaking a law.

2. Pence is ALREADY involved with stopping AA.

3. CCW is critically important.

4. Muslims will be banned, and already have been upheld by the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court upholds Trump’s travel ban on several Muslim countries

 

[protectionist]

Except the Senate has already done this, while Hillary did not win the 2016 election. So, if by "like" you meant "exactly the opposite of"...then yeah, good point!

You didn't answer my question about Trump asking Comey to back off.

How ? When ?

 

[protectionist]

Republicans make up 27% of voters so saying he has 90% of them is not saying much.

How does 50% approval (as opposed to 49% disapproval) of ALL VOTERS sound ?