Trump called police on Epstein in 2006

[TNHarley]

So Trump ONLY kicked him out in 2007 for being a pervert, and yet you think he's implicated in files that clearly show he never went to pedo island and couldn't stand Epstein once he realized the kind of pervert he was.

Do I think that? Or did you just make shit up?

 

[Luckyone]

Interesting. So Donald Trump informed the police about Epstein’s sex trafficking in 2006. There goes the lefts narrative.

Loading…

www.forbes.com

It seems that you are a gullible person as there are statements in your own link that you missed (on purpose?).

Let's begin with the word "reportedly" that is in the heading.

There are no "actual" reports that prove that statement! Here in the article you supplied:

"from a 2019 FBI interview reportedly of former Palm Beach police chief Michael Reiter, in which he describes a 2006 phone call where President Donald Trump said of Jeffrey Epstein"

You do know that Trump has a lot of loyal people that are willing to lie for him (just as he lies in a pathological way), don't you?

Then there is this statement in your link:

"Trump told Reiter that Maxwell was Epstein’s “operative” and said “she is evil”

Here is the present and proven reality of that "evil" statement:

Donald Trump has not directly pardoned Ghislaine Maxwell, but his administration and public comments have been described as providing favorable treatment and potential avenues for her release in exchange for her testimony regarding his innocence in the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Is that how someone treats an EVIL person?

Then there is this statement in the article:

"The document redacts the name of the person being interviewed and the publicly available version does not include the date of the phone call with Trump"

Last but not least, this is another statement in the article you supplied:

"When asked Tuesday about the report White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded that Trump barred Epstein from his club at Mar-a-Lago “because, frankly, Jeffrey Epstein was a creep,” adding that Epstein’s crimes are “heinous” and “disgusting” and the president’s statements remain true."

and yet this recently reported fact disputes all that Trump has said:

There are 3.5 million pages in the Epstein report and Trump is

Raskin: Trump Mentioned “More Than a Million Times” in Unredacted Epstein Files​

Raskin said a document in the files also undermines Trump’s claim that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

Raskin told Axios that he searched Trump’s name in the files on Monday, and it came up “more than a million times.” This is a clear contradiction to what Trump has claimed about his involvement with the child sex trafficker.

As such, your OP is not believable

 

[airplanemechanic]

Do I think that? Or did you just make shit up?

I quoted EXACTLY what you said.

If you made it up, that's on you. We know it wouldn't be the first time.

 

[Slade3200]

He made no effort to dismiss it.

Everything had been delivered

This is just yoj and your oarty’s attempt to deflect from the content of the files that shows what we all already knew, you all spent years protecting Epstein

Of course he did, now you’re just lying. Why don’t think Trump and MTG had their falling out? Cause Trump wanted her to kill the release bill and she wouldn’t.

And not everything was released. Millions of pages were withheld until political pressure finally pushed them over the edge. No more covering for trumps buddies

 

[TNHarley]

I quoted EXACTLY what you said.

If you made it up, that's on you. We know it wouldn't be the first time.

and yet you think he's implicated in files
AKA you made shit up. Thanks.

 

[hadit]

It’s up to LE to determine how to proceed. You keep defending assholes who cover for child rapists though.

Nope, release everything. Let's see who's in there and what they did and quit with the griping about who knew what and when. Did anyone face any consequences because they knew about Harvey Weinstein and did nothing, or is the vitriol reserved for Orange Man?

The narrative had to shift when it became obvious there was no smoking gun that was going to destroy Orange Man, and it had to go from "He did something" to "We hate him because he heard about something".

 

[Slade3200]

Did anyone face any consequences because they knew about Harvey Weinstein and did nothing, or is the vitriol reserved for Orange Man?

You’re still making excuses and whataboutisms. The question isn’t whether people did anything it’s whether they should have. And yes they absolutely should have. Their inaction doesn’t excuse others for inaction

 

[Slade3200]

The narrative had to shift when it became obvious there was no smoking gun that was going to destroy Orange Man, and it had to go from "He did something" to "We hate him because he heard about something".

Why are you so obsessed with political narratives?? Who cares.

I don’t think there is anything in those files that criminally implicates Trump. It would have come out by now. But there’s plenty that makes him look bad. Plenty that exposes his lies. Plenty that implicates his friends.

The fact that you’re trying so hard to make excuses for these scumbags just shows the cult like following Trump has. It’s pathetic

 

[Hellokitty]

Raskin: Trump Mentioned “More Than a Million Times” in Unredacted Epstein Files​

Raskin said a document in the files also undermines Trump’s claim that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago.

Raskin told Axios that he searched Trump’s name in the files on Monday, and it came up “more than a million times.” This is a clear contradiction to what Trump has claimed about his involvement with the child sex trafficker.

As such, your OP is not believable

How many of the million times includes direct contact between TRUMP and Epstein?

 

[struth]

Of course he did, now you’re just lying. Why don’t think Trump and MTG had their falling out? Cause Trump wanted her to kill the release bill and she wouldn’t.

And not everything was released. Millions of pages were withheld until political pressure finally pushed them over the edge. No more covering for trumps buddies

of course he didn't, he didn't veto it, he could have. Frankly, he could of just ignored Epstein and protected him like Obama and Clinton did, and not indicted him and Maxwell to begin with, but he didn't.

Everything has been released

 

[Slade3200]

of course he didn't, he didn't veto it, he could have.

Thank god that political and public pressure still have an impact. He sure as hell tried to kill it as I pointed out with the MTG fall out

 

[Slade3200]

Frankly, he could have just ignored Epstein and protected him like Obama and Clinton did, and not indicted him and Maxwell to begin with, but he didn't.

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if he would have lived. Trump Pardon perhaps?

 

[struth]

Thank god that political and public pressure still have an impact. He sure as hell tried to kill it as I pointed out with the MTG fall out

Show me where he tried to veto the bill....I'll wait.

Frankly, he played the Dems perfectly, he warned you all not to release them, but got you all to sign off on it, and now it's all out there, showing how your party spent decades protecting Epstein, and how he was basically running your party.

 

[struth]

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if he would have lived. Trump Pardon perhaps?

If he wanted to pardon him, he just would have ignored his crimes and protected him like Clinton and Obama did.

 

[hadit]

Why are you so obsessed with political narratives?? Who cares.

And there it is, who cares. This whole thing is completely political. Quid Pro Joe sat on it for 4 years, expressing no concern whatsoever, and you guys said nothing. Suddenly, Orange Man takes office and it's sunspots, dogs and cats living together, uneven tire wear and poor gas mileage all at the same time.

I don’t think there is anything in those files that criminally implicates Trump. It would have come out by now. But there’s plenty that makes him look bad. Plenty that exposes his lies. Plenty that implicates his friends.

The fact that you’re trying so hard to make excuses for these scumbags just shows the cult like following Trump has. It’s pathetic

I have made no excuses, on the contrary have and still advocate releasing the entire enchilada no matter who it hits. I just refuse to jump on the hate bandwagon without a good reason. We know Epstein hated TRUMP! and we know democrats hate TRUMP! and we know democrats were in communication with EPSTEIN to get questions to ask, so it's not a surprise TRUMP!'s name is in the files. That does not equate to making TRUMP! a child abuser, which is the connection you're dying for everyone to make.

 

[Slade3200]

Show me where he tried to veto the bill....I'll wait.

I didn’t claim he tried to veto the bill. If you have to make up narratives to hang in this argument then you’ve lost.

I said he tried and kill it and the MTG fall out is one piece of proof.

If you want to refute it then why dont you explain the fall out.

 

[Slade3200]

Frankly, he played the Dems perfectly, he warned you all not to release them

Why would he warn Dems not to release them?! What does that even mean.
He campaigned on releasing them and the Dems have no power to release them as the Reps own a supermajority.

You’re arguments are getting really really bad

 

[Nostra]

And he also didn’t say that he was calling the police on Epstein. You lied in your title.
He simply told a cop “good job.”

What title, Stupid?


.

 

[TNHarley]

Show me where he tried to veto the bill....I'll wait.

Frankly, he played the Dems perfectly, he warned you all not to release them, but got you all to sign off on it, and now it's all out there, showing how your party spent decades protecting Epstein, and how he was basically running your party.

Giving him credit for this is a bit disingenuous. That guy said he would release them in the campaign season. Then said it was a hoax. Then said to make a law to release them, then he signed the law. Then he broke HIS OWN LAW and didnt release them on time, and had massive redactions.
BTW, have they unredacted those files that were required by law, or are they still protecting those sick freaks?

 

[struth]

I didn’t claim he tried to veto the bill. If you have to make up narratives to hang in this argument then you’ve lost.

I said he tried and kill it and the MTG fall out is one piece of proof.

If you want to refute it then why dont you explain the fall out.

You literally said " He sure as hell tried to kill it as" - what do you think a veto is? It's how a President can kill a bill.

The fall out is, was, because she is wacky. Pushing conspiracy theories, and then she broke with him on Xiden subs....she is in fact wacky