Trump Being Compared To Hitler

[jc456]

but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Sure you can, but can you say Bush killed nearly 3000 on 9-11-01 right here in the homeland?

Well, only a moroonie would believe either one!

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

 

[jc456]

Oh and you think Bush didn't do the same??

Oh and you think he could have know that jihadists were training to fly planes?? You think Clinton couldn't have figured it out as well??

Both are to blame but Bush will forever get most of the blame because he was POTUS at the time.

A biased idiot you truly are. Idiot.

No, Bush didn't get airport security raised at any airports. Had he done that like Clinton had done years earlier, doing so might have prevented 9.11.

So Clinton knew something was up but didn't stop it?? He raised airport security but did nothing to stop the attack??

WTF??

Who said he didn't stop it? That was back in 1998 and there was no attack.

He's as guilty as Bush maybe more so because according to you he knew something was up and yet the attack still happened. He should have stopped it just like you think Bush should have stopped it.

They both knew something was up as they both received a PDB warning of potential hijackings. One had airport security raised, the other didn't. One prevented the attack, the other didn't.

You. Truly. Are. One. Asshole. of. an. idiot.

You know I take that as a badge of honor coming from folks like you, right?

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

 

[BlindBoo]

but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Sure you can, but can you say Bush killed nearly 3000 on 9-11-01 right here in the homeland?

Well, only a moroonie would believe either one!

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

 

[Claudette]

but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Sure you can, but can you say Bush killed nearly 3000 on 9-11-01 right here in the homeland?

Well, only a moroonie would believe either one!

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

No Clinton didn't kill the men at Benghazi. Her incompetence did.

Does that help???

 

[jc456]

but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Sure you can, but can you say Bush killed nearly 3000 on 9-11-01 right here in the homeland?

Well, only a moroonie would believe either one!

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

why would anyone say that? I'm sorry, but I haven't seen your stupid point since you first posted it.

 

[Faun]

No, Bush didn't get airport security raised at any airports. Had he done that like Clinton had done years earlier, doing so might have prevented 9.11.

So Clinton knew something was up but didn't stop it?? He raised airport security but did nothing to stop the attack??

WTF??

Who said he didn't stop it? That was back in 1998 and there was no attack.

He's as guilty as Bush maybe more so because according to you he knew something was up and yet the attack still happened. He should have stopped it just like you think Bush should have stopped it.

They both knew something was up as they both received a PDB warning of potential hijackings. One had airport security raised, the other didn't. One prevented the attack, the other didn't.

You. Truly. Are. One. Asshole. of. an. idiot.

You know I take that as a badge of honor coming from folks like you, right?

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

 

[jc456]

So Clinton knew something was up but didn't stop it?? He raised airport security but did nothing to stop the attack??

WTF??

Who said he didn't stop it? That was back in 1998 and there was no attack.

He's as guilty as Bush maybe more so because according to you he knew something was up and yet the attack still happened. He should have stopped it just like you think Bush should have stopped it.

They both knew something was up as they both received a PDB warning of potential hijackings. One had airport security raised, the other didn't. One prevented the attack, the other didn't.

You. Truly. Are. One. Asshole. of. an. idiot.

You know I take that as a badge of honor coming from folks like you, right?

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

 

[Faun]

WTF??

Who said he didn't stop it? That was back in 1998 and there was no attack.

They both knew something was up as they both received a PDB warning of potential hijackings. One had airport security raised, the other didn't. One prevented the attack, the other didn't.

You know I take that as a badge of honor coming from folks like you, right?

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

 

[jc456]

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

how the fk do you know that? You see em too? hahahahahahaahahahaha the stupid again never stops flowing from the left.

 

[Faun]

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

how the fk do you know that? You see em too? hahahahahahaahahahaha the stupid again never stops flowing from the left.

Moron... We've all seen the August 6th PDB.

 

[jc456]

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

how the fk do you know that? You see em too? hahahahahahaahahahaha the stupid again never stops flowing from the left.

Moron... We've all seen the August 6th PDB.

and?

August 6 PDB - 911myths

"Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US

Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the U.S. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America."

After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Ladin told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to xxxxxxxxxxx service.

An Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) operative told an xxxxxxxxxx service at the same time that Bin Ladin was planning to exploit the operative's access to the US to mount a terrorist strike."

 

[BlindBoo]

Sure you can, but can you say Bush killed nearly 3000 on 9-11-01 right here in the homeland?

Well, only a moroonie would believe either one!

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

why would anyone say that? I'm sorry, but I haven't seen your stupid point since you first posted it.

Good question, why did you say it.

"but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi."

 

[BlindBoo]

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

how the fk do you know that? You see em too? hahahahahahaahahahaha the stupid again never stops flowing from the left.

Moron... We've all seen the August 6th PDB.

and?

August 6 PDB - 911myths

"Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US

Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the U.S. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America."

After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Ladin told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to xxxxxxxxxxx service.

An Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) operative told an xxxxxxxxxx service at the same time that Bin Ladin was planning to exploit the operative's access to the US to mount a terrorist strike."

Where are the other PDB for that summer? What did he really know? Why haven't they been released. What are they hiding?

 

[jc456]

nope, he had congress backing. that's on congress, which again puts all those numbers on Hitlery. nice try though.

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

why would anyone say that? I'm sorry, but I haven't seen your stupid point since you first posted it.

Good question, why did you say it.

"but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi."

cause I can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

 

[BlindBoo]

What Congressional backing did President Bush have on 9-11-01 when terrorist launched their assault?

None.

Neither President Bush nor Sec. Clinton killed anyone.

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

why would anyone say that? I'm sorry, but I haven't seen your stupid point since you first posted it.

Good question, why did you say it.

"but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi."

cause I can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Just cause huh?

Nice.

 

[Faun]

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

how the fk do you know that? You see em too? hahahahahahaahahahaha the stupid again never stops flowing from the left.

Moron... We've all seen the August 6th PDB.

and?

August 6 PDB - 911myths

"Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US

Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate Bin Ladin since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the U.S. Bin Ladin implied in US television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef and "bring the fighting to America."

After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Ladin told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to xxxxxxxxxxx service.

An Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ) operative told an xxxxxxxxxx service at the same time that Bin Ladin was planning to exploit the operative's access to the US to mount a terrorist strike."

Did you really think more evidence was needed that you're a lying piece of shit?

Here's the part you intentionally left out...

Nevertheless, FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.

... and I highlight the sad reality that you're afraid to answer my question....

I'll ask it again just so I can watch you avoid it again...

In 1998, Clinton received a similar PDB warning of potential hijackings. In direct response to that PDB, Clinton immediately had airport security raised at suspect airports in the NE. There was no attack. Two terrorists were possibly even arrested, though that remains unconfirmed.

In 2001, Bush receives a similar PDB warning of potential hijackings.....

... what was the Bush response...?

 

[paulitician]

Ah, the old Hitler accusation. When you can't beat em, just call em a 'Hitler.' Same ole tired shite. Movin on...

 

[Claudette]

Well he should have stopped 9-11 as well.

You seem to think that Bush being in office for eight months should have stopped it yet you are giving Clinton a pass??

If you hold one accountable then you should hold both accountable.

Glad you consider yourself an asshole because you are. Big. Deep. And. Wide.

Clinton wasn't president, Bush was. The responsibility was Bush's.

or perhaps the hand off from Clinton was poorly done since his unit was on trial. See how personal issues affect the country. Johnson got more attention then the terrorists. wow are you reaching bubba.

Nope, that had no effect on Clinton's ability to protect us within our borders as he had airport security raised upon receiving a PDB similar to the one Bush received, warning of potential hijackings. That resulted in no airplanes hijacked and flown into buildings on his watch.

What did have an effect, however, was the traitorous rightwing, who rather than work with Clinton to protect this nation, attacked him as being "devious" when he said he wanted to create a new division to focus specifically on preventing domestic attacks inside the U.S..

Here's how it works.... the right fights Clinton's efforts to prevent attacks inside the U.S. .... but then attacks him when an attack occurs -- when he's no longer even president.

That's how much the rightwing hates America. They would rather see America burn down to the ground than see a leftwing president be successful.

sure it did and you giving him an out is ridiculous. any blame is assigned to the intelligence hand off. Period. And BTW, Hitlery was in the WH then.

That utter bullshit excuse is easily blown up.

The intelligence gathering supplied Bush with warnings ... what did Bush do in response to those warnings? We know what Clinton did -- he had airport security raised.

What was the Bush response...?

Didn't you just say that Clinton had those same warnings??

Well hell. He should have been able to stop 9-11 with those warnings just like you think Bush should have.

Seems only Bush is to blame and not Clinton though Clinton had years of warnings. To bad they didn't attack while he was still POTUS because your sorry ass would be singing a different tune.

 

[easyt65]

Hillary comparing Trump to Hitler is like Joseph Goebbels comparing someone to Hitler.

 

[jc456]

huh?

Any one who claims President Bush (43) or Sec. Clinton killed Americans on 9-11-01 or 9-11-12, is a moroonie.

Does that help?

why would anyone say that? I'm sorry, but I haven't seen your stupid point since you first posted it.

Good question, why did you say it.

"but we can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi."

cause I can say that hitlery killed four americans in Benghazi.

Just cause huh?

Nice.

yep, my constitutional rights like ole kaepernicker dude.