WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
It will come in early & under budget.
The original budget was $200 Million.
What are the current expected cost? Last I seen you have heard was $400 Million.
Do it’s already over budget.
WW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It will come in early & under budget.
Under budget after trump.said the cost doubled ? Or under new budget , now that the cost doubled.It will come in early & under budget.
Fortune magazine admits to 37 donors so every donor must be wealthy. This has now become their business and not JoeB131's nor any of the folks posting who never donated.It will come in early & under budget.
You can disagree all you want but it is happening.
Why are Democrats so angry that Trump is constructing a 90,000 sq ft building where he works and resides? And he has obtained at least 37 very rich people to pay for it?New images offer closer look at demolition for the White House ballroom
President Donald Trump in mid-September quietly launched one of the biggest transformations to the White House in its 233-year history, concealing plans that were far more sweeping than what he had revealed publicly.
Apparently they preferred a circus tent and outhouses for foreign dignitaries...... Obama preferred tents.Why are Democrats so angry that Trump is constructing a 90,000 sq ft building where he works and resides? And he has obtained at least 37 very rich people to pay for it?
I can only speak for myself but building monolithic structures that feign / embody nationalism are generally things despots and authoritarian leaders create. Maybe it helps them feel big. Whatever I view it as a negative to have anything like that in reference to a US President. Also theore grandiose it is that most likely reflects a psychological problem as well.Why are Democrats so angry that Trump is constructing a 90,000 sq ft building where he works and resides? And he has obtained at least 37 very rich people to pay for it?
You represent the worst Democrats. The Ballroom can be used for inaugurations.I can only speak for myself but building monolithic structures that feign / embody nationalism are generally things despots and authoritarian leaders create. Maybe it helps them feel big. Whatever I view it as a negative to have anything like that in reference to a US President. Also theore grandiose it is that most likely reflects a psychological problem as well.
Circus tents are less costly.I can only speak for myself but building monolithic structures that feign / embody nationalism are generally things despots and authoritarian leaders create. Maybe it helps them feel big. Whatever I view it as a negative to have anything like that in reference to a US President. Also theore grandiose it is that most likely reflects a psychological problem as well.
You represent the worst Democrats. The Ballroom can be used for inaugurations.
Karen McDougal is 54 and my guess is she still is fabulous.The courts said redact. Take it up with them.
Koo Stark is no Karen McDougal, obviously.
You mean the closet used by Lyndon Johnson who had sex with women there?Given Trump's crowd turnout for inaugurations, they could have used the White House Broom closet.
WW
You mean the closet used by Lyndon Johnson who had sex with women there?
I am an Independent. I explained my view , I don't think Democrats said anything like what I said.You represent the worst Democrats. The Ballroom can be used for inaugurations.
Given Trump's crowd turnout for inaugurations, they could have used the White House Broom closet.
WW
The Daily Mail reported in April that Trump had started pitching the construction of a White House ballroom in 2010 - back when President Barack Obama was in office and before he launched his own political career.Why are Democrats so angry that Trump is constructing a 90,000 sq ft building where he works and resides? And he has obtained at least 37 very rich people to pay for it?
Frankly, I can't think of a better metaphor for the whole Trump Regime. They are very good at tearing things down, but they suck at actually building anything.
![]()
The White House ballroom will never be built
Trump can't focus long enough, even on his $400 million passion projectwww.salon.com
In October, Donald Trump traumatized all true patriots by tearing down the East Wing of the White House. The move, he claims, will clear the way for a ballroom for holding large events that are typically held in tents on the South Lawn. A debate immediately arose online over whether or not the next Democratic president should tear down the ballroom or keep it, albeit with the necessary extensive renovations to remove all the tackiness Trump brings to any project.
Two months later, it increasingly seems that such discussion was a wasted effort, as the chance this ballroom will actually be built is rapidly disappearing. Perhaps it could have if Trump had delegated the management of the project to someone competent, but that’s not what he did. Instead, the famously lazy and disorganized president decided to blow off his actual governance duties in favor of micromanaging a construction project he is incapable of handling. Finishing the ballroom in the next three years would be difficult for anyone, but it’s quickly becoming clear it will be nearly impossible for the famed real estate tycoon to pull it off.
For anyone who has dealt with any renovation project more complex than patching drywall, the ballroom’s construction is waving every red flag possible, signaling endless delays that will stretch for months — and, in all likelihood, for years. Despite announcing plans for the ballroom in July, it’s clear there’s no idea what it’s going to look like, how big it will be or how it will be laid out. Trump keeps changing things, driven by a short-sighted impulsiveness that keeps pushing him to expand the scope of the project. Initially, it was supposed to seat 650 people in 90,000 square feet, but he kept throwing tantrums about how he wanted it bigger. Earlier this month, he even ran off the initial architect, and odds are that will happen again.
Then there’s the red tape. Even though a judge ruled against the National Trust for Historic Preservation in their lawsuit to temporarily halt construction, he required the White House to avoid building anything foundational and demanded plans for the structure be submitted by the end of the year. But as the White House hasn’t even scheduled meetings with the National Capital Planning Commission to start the process, meeting that deadline appears unlikely.
Frankly, I can't think of a better metaphor for the whole Trump Regime. They are very good at tearing things down, but they suck at actually building anything.
![]()
The White House ballroom will never be built
Trump can't focus long enough, even on his $400 million passion projectwww.salon.com
In October, Donald Trump traumatized all true patriots by tearing down the East Wing of the White House. The move, he claims, will clear the way for a ballroom for holding large events that are typically held in tents on the South Lawn. A debate immediately arose online over whether or not the next Democratic president should tear down the ballroom or keep it, albeit with the necessary extensive renovations to remove all the tackiness Trump brings to any project.
Two months later, it increasingly seems that such discussion was a wasted effort, as the chance this ballroom will actually be built is rapidly disappearing. Perhaps it could have if Trump had delegated the management of the project to someone competent, but that’s not what he did. Instead, the famously lazy and disorganized president decided to blow off his actual governance duties in favor of micromanaging a construction project he is incapable of handling. Finishing the ballroom in the next three years would be difficult for anyone, but it’s quickly becoming clear it will be nearly impossible for the famed real estate tycoon to pull it off.
For anyone who has dealt with any renovation project more complex than patching drywall, the ballroom’s construction is waving every red flag possible, signaling endless delays that will stretch for months — and, in all likelihood, for years. Despite announcing plans for the ballroom in July, it’s clear there’s no idea what it’s going to look like, how big it will be or how it will be laid out. Trump keeps changing things, driven by a short-sighted impulsiveness that keeps pushing him to expand the scope of the project. Initially, it was supposed to seat 650 people in 90,000 square feet, but he kept throwing tantrums about how he wanted it bigger. Earlier this month, he even ran off the initial architect, and odds are that will happen again.
Then there’s the red tape. Even though a judge ruled against the National Trust for Historic Preservation in their lawsuit to temporarily halt construction, he required the White House to avoid building anything foundational and demanded plans for the structure be submitted by the end of the year. But as the White House hasn’t even scheduled meetings with the National Capital Planning Commission to start the process, meeting that deadline appears unlikely.