Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election” (Through Discovery)

[Cellblock2429]

The courts refused to entertain cases that lacked even a shred of credible evidence as a basis for filing them.

/——/ The courts never considered the evidence. They just refused.

 

[MagicMike]

/——/ The courts never considered the evidence. They just refused. View attachment 815996

This is simply not true no matter how many times you say it.

 

[Cellblock2429]

This is simply not true no matter how many times you say it.

/——/ Then prove me wrong.

 

[MagicMike]

/——/ Then prove me wrong.

Prove to you that the cases were thrown out for lack of evidence?

Ok.
Here you go, but in order to understand it you are going to have to READ.
I don't have much faith that you can do that.
If you were a reader in the first place you wouldn't be in a position of being dumb enough to believe what you do.
But anyway, here you go.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

 

[Cellblock2429]

Prove to you that the cases were thrown out for lack of evidence?

Ok.
Here you go, but in order to understand it you are going to have to READ.
I don't have much faith that you can do that.
If you were a reader in the first place you wouldn't be in a position of being dumb enough to believe what you do.
But anyway, here you go.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

/——/ That link had nothing to do with courts refusing to hear Trumps lawsuits. It’s just an opinion piece. Maybe you should have read it.

 

[Flash]

Laughing.....so your 'legal theory' requires that we ignore the Supreme Court explicitly contradicting you and obliterating your entire, imaginary rant.

Good luck with that.

You dumb shit.

First of all there was no White v Texas decision in 1960 when the states seceded.

Second of all the case was about Texas paying money to the filthy ass Federal government, not about secession. The legality of secession was never argued in the case. It was tacked on in the decison.

Third of all the shitheads that made the decision were all asshole Union pukes. Like serving on Lincoln's cabinet level shitheads. You would never have expected them to actually look at the law after a war that was fought over seccsion and come up with any other answer, would you? That correct answer would have made the Civil War illegal and those dickheads weren't about to do that. They were biased as hell and made a terrible decision. One of the worst in history of the Court.

Lastly who gives a shit what those dickheads said? If a state is going to secede it is not going to recognize the decisions of a court from another country, is it?

Fuck the Union.

 

[MagicMike]

/——/ That link had nothing to do with courts refusing to hear Trumps lawsuits. It’s just an opinion piece. Maybe you should have read it.

You should have read it to.
An INFORMED opinion has a LOT more credibility than your ignorant of the facts one does.

 

[scruffy]

Laughing.....Trump voluntarily dismissed his own case. Where he could have called witnesses, done discovery, presented evidence.

But instead, Trump ran with his tail between his legs.

Keep those eyes screwed shut, comrade.

You're back? Masochist much?

There's no use spending money on a case you already know won't be heard. Right? Kinda duh...

And secondly, the Dems have backed themselves into a corner now, they no longer have a choice. They MUST undergo discovery, and if they withhold even one little piece of evidence the case will get thrown out.

They're fucked. There's no way this fog and pony show can survive the light. Now they're going to force the court to look at those 20,000 illegal late votes in AZ, whether they want to or not.

 

[AveMarica]

Count on it!

That will FORCE CNN and MSNBC to carry it! And all their leftist viewers will be forced to see the evidence of the stolen 2020 election!

I'm sure CNN and MSNBC would have loved to carry the press conference Trump promised for Monday where he would present, once and for all, IRREFUTABLE & OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that the election was stolen, leading to all charges dismissed and FULL EXONERATION.

However it appears Trump has changed his mind about simply showing this IRREFUTABLE & OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE and would rather spend millions of dollars in legal fees to go to trial. It makes so much sense.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I'm sure CNN and MSNBC would have loved to carry the press conference Trump promised for Monday where he would present, once and for all, IRREFUTABLE & OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that the election was stolen, leading to all charges dismissed and FULL EXONERATION.

However it appears Trump has changed his mind about simply showing this IRREFUTABLE & OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE and would rather spend millions of dollars in legal fees to go to trial. It makes so much sense.

View attachment 816261

/----/ What's your point. It sounds like a better strategy.

 

[Dragonlady]

Just like he did on his CNN town hall a couple months ago?

View attachment 810636

You think that CNN Townhall was a success for Trump????

He was successfully sued for slander and libel, and the Special Prosecutor is using clips from that Town Hall wherein Donald Trump admitted on national television that he stole classified documents from the White House and refused to return them because they were "his documents".

In fact, every single one of his criminal indictments for election shenanigans and documents will be using clips from that TV appearance to convict Trump of the crimes for which he's been charged. He basically confessed to EVERYTHING.

 

[Arlette]

Discovery baby! That's what the Deep State does not want. Jack Smith has just opened up a can of worms with his bogus indictment.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election”​

Video in the link below. Brett Baier just got schooled by Trump's lawyer.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: "We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election" | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C. revolves heavily around the unproven assertion that the 2020 Election was legitimate, free from fraud and that President Trump “knowingly” asserted “baseless claims” of election fraud.
President Trump’s team was constricted immensely by a ridiculously narrow window of just a few weeks to compile data from an obfuscated election system that was bolstered by unprecedented COVID-19 mail-in balloting rules put in place. It was reminiscent of the Wild, Wild West. And still, cases were brought, and quickly dismissed, typically using procedural justifications such as “standing” or “laches” before any evidentiary hearings or discovery was permitted.
The Gateway Pundit has documented numerous examples of unresolved issues and concerns from USPS employees appearing to stuff piles of ballots into drop boxes in Michigan, to two 4am deliveries in the backdoor of the TCF Center in Detroit, more than 20,000 ballots delivered after the deadline in Maricopa County, the mysterious disappearance of Jesse Morgan’s USPS trailer that he claims contained around 250,000 filled out mail-in ballots transported from NJ to PA, and “erroneous code” being found on almost every Georgia county who’s system log files were analyzed. And that’s a few examples with many, many more documented.

In fact, just yesterday The Gateway Pundit published a report from Erich Speckin, a 20-year veteran contractor with the State of Michigan who investigated the 2020 Election AVCB ballots in Detroit and found there could be upwards of 35,000 illegal ballots.

Now, given the wording and accusations levied in the indictment against President Trump, one of his attorneys, John Lauro, weighed on FOX News with Brett Baier:

I don't think so. I read they asked for a trial date in 2026, well that's ridiculous. They are not gonna get that and that alone blows up their plan to relitigate everything.
They best be focusing on the specific charge and nothing else if they plan on getting old Trumpy off the hook

 

[Dragonlady]

/----/ What's your point. It sounds like a better strategy.

It's not a strategy at all. If he tries to release his report, he will be convicted slam dunk. Trump has no defense for these charges. And he will end up in jail for trying to prejudice the jury pool.

As for his "irrefutable evidence", what part of "He won't even be allowed to introduce evidence that the election was stolen" at his January 6th trial, are you not understanding???? Whether or not the election was stolen is irrelevant to the case. What Trump did was criminal and even if he has evidence of a stolen election, he can't use fraud, fake electors, or a conspiracy to reject the real electors, to overturn it.

Trump has had more than 2 years to present this evidence, and he waited until he was facing years in prison that he pulled it out????? This sounds like "The surveillance video at Mar-a-lago showed the FBI behaving badly in the raid". Really???? So why haven't you released it Donnie????

 

[Dragonlady]

Discovery baby! That's what the Deep State does not want. Jack Smith has just opened up a can of worms with his bogus indictment.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election”​

Video in the link below. Brett Baier just got schooled by Trump's lawyer.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: "We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election" | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C. revolves heavily around the unproven assertion that the 2020 Election was legitimate, free from fraud and that President Trump “knowingly” asserted “baseless claims” of election fraud.
President Trump’s team was constricted immensely by a ridiculously narrow window of just a few weeks to compile data from an obfuscated election system that was bolstered by unprecedented COVID-19 mail-in balloting rules put in place. It was reminiscent of the Wild, Wild West. And still, cases were brought, and quickly dismissed, typically using procedural justifications such as “standing” or “laches” before any evidentiary hearings or discovery was permitted.
The Gateway Pundit has documented numerous examples of unresolved issues and concerns from USPS employees appearing to stuff piles of ballots into drop boxes in Michigan, to two 4am deliveries in the backdoor of the TCF Center in Detroit, more than 20,000 ballots delivered after the deadline in Maricopa County, the mysterious disappearance of Jesse Morgan’s USPS trailer that he claims contained around 250,000 filled out mail-in ballots transported from NJ to PA, and “erroneous code” being found on almost every Georgia county who’s system log files were analyzed. And that’s a few examples with many, many more documented.

In fact, just yesterday The Gateway Pundit published a report from Erich Speckin, a 20-year veteran contractor with the State of Michigan who investigated the 2020 Election AVCB ballots in Detroit and found there could be upwards of 35,000 illegal ballots.

Now, given the wording and accusations levied in the indictment against President Trump, one of his attorneys, John Lauro, weighed on FOX News with Brett Baier:

What do any of these claims have to do with Fake Electors and stopping the certification of the election????? None of this relative to anything Trump has been charged with.

 

[Curried Goats]

You're back? Masochist much?

There's no use spending money on a case you already know won't be heard. Right? Kinda duh...

And secondly, the Dems have backed themselves into a corner now, they no longer have a choice. They MUST undergo discovery, and if they withhold even one little piece of evidence the case will get thrown out.

They're fucked. There's no way this fog and pony show can survive the light. Now they're going to force the court to look at those 20,000 illegal late votes in AZ, whether they want to or not.

Who's worried about this discovery? We all look forward to this Dipshit of a lawyer proving once and for all that the election wasn't stolen.

 

[candycorn]

Discovery baby! That's what the Deep State does not want. Jack Smith has just opened up a can of worms with his bogus indictment.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election”​

Video in the link below. Brett Baier just got schooled by Trump's lawyer.

Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: "We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election" | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C. revolves heavily around the unproven assertion that the 2020 Election was legitimate, free from fraud and that President Trump “knowingly” asserted “baseless claims” of election fraud.
President Trump’s team was constricted immensely by a ridiculously narrow window of just a few weeks to compile data from an obfuscated election system that was bolstered by unprecedented COVID-19 mail-in balloting rules put in place. It was reminiscent of the Wild, Wild West. And still, cases were brought, and quickly dismissed, typically using procedural justifications such as “standing” or “laches” before any evidentiary hearings or discovery was permitted.
The Gateway Pundit has documented numerous examples of unresolved issues and concerns from USPS employees appearing to stuff piles of ballots into drop boxes in Michigan, to two 4am deliveries in the backdoor of the TCF Center in Detroit, more than 20,000 ballots delivered after the deadline in Maricopa County, the mysterious disappearance of Jesse Morgan’s USPS trailer that he claims contained around 250,000 filled out mail-in ballots transported from NJ to PA, and “erroneous code” being found on almost every Georgia county who’s system log files were analyzed. And that’s a few examples with many, many more documented.

In fact, just yesterday The Gateway Pundit published a report from Erich Speckin, a 20-year veteran contractor with the State of Michigan who investigated the 2020 Election AVCB ballots in Detroit and found there could be upwards of 35,000 illegal ballots.

Now, given the wording and accusations levied in the indictment against President Trump, one of his attorneys, John Lauro, weighed on FOX News with Brett Baier:

So all of this stuff that was laughed out of court the first time will be suddenly entered into evidence?

Can't wait!

 

[bodecea]

See? Contrarian to the core!
QAnon is made up BULLSHIT; a fake PHANTOM menace, made up by you demented Marxist idiots.
Just ANOTHER example of the GASLIGHT THEATRE from you twisted sick fucks!

Talk about gaslighting.... lololol

 

[bodecea]

Who's worried about this discovery? We all look forward to this Dipshit of a lawyer proving once and for all that the election wasn't stolen.

You'd think the orange sexual abuser would want to prove his "innocence" as soon as possible.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Talk about gaslighting.... lololol

That's exactly what YOUR Q CRAP actually is.
Good call!!!!!

 

[bodecea]

You dumb shit.

First of all there was no White v Texas decision in 1960 when the states seceded.

Second of all the case was about Texas paying money to the filthy ass Federal government, not about secession. The legality of secession was never argued in the case. It was tacked on in the decison.

Third of all the shitheads that made the decision were all asshole Union pukes. Like serving on Lincoln's cabinet level shitheads. You would never have expected them to actually look at the law after a war that was fought over seccsion and come up with any other answer, would you? That correct answer would have made the Civil War illegal and those dickheads weren't about to do that. They were biased as hell and made a terrible decision. One of the worst in history of the Court.

Lastly who gives a shit what those dickheads said? If a state is going to secede it is not going to recognize the decisions of a court from another country, is it?

Fuck the Union.

The states seceded in 1960? Lololololol