AveMarica
Platinum Member
- Aug 16, 2023
- 556
- 278
- 473
I agree 100%. IMO Trump would have to be either convicted in a courtroom or in a senate trial after impeachment for eligibility rules to apply. Neither has happened, so he is a valid candidate.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election” (Through Discovery)
- Thread starter MAGA Macho Man
- Start date
/----/ Here's your cue to attack someone who disagrees with you. Alan Morton Dershowitz (/ˈdɜːrʃəwɪts/ DURR-shə-wits; born September 1, 1938) is an American lawyer and former law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law.[1][2] From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993.[3][4] -WikipediaThis guy is no "highly respected Constitutional law scholar". He's was high priced litigation specialist, and he is a right wing legal commentary, and the kind of guy who will say whatever his client hires him to say. I'd definitely hire this guy to sue somebody - Advocate of the year!!!! His biography claims no expertise whatsoever in Consitiutional law. The word "Constitution" isn't even mentioned in his biography. From his own biography:
David W. Rivkin
David W. Rivkin is Co-Chair of Debevoise’s International Dispute Resolution Group and Past President of the International Bar Association (IBA).www.debevoise.com
Dr. Lawrence Tribe, one of the most cited Constitutional Scholars in America and a retired Constitutional law professor from Harvard, recently published an article saying that Trump is disqualifed from running for President under the 14th Amendement.
His co-author is also a REAL highly respected Constitutional law scholar. Judge J. Michael Luttig - the guy who advised VP Pence that he had no Constitutional authority to do what Trump told him to do.
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again
The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.www.theatlantic.com
I'll take the word of the real "highly respected Constitutional law scholars", over the guy who plays one on TV, any day of the week.
Laurence H. Tribe - Harvard Law School
Laurence H. Tribe is the Carl M. Loeb University Professor of Constitutional Law Emeritus at Harvard University. The title “University Professor” is Harvard’s highest academic honor, awarded to fewer than 75 professors in the University’s history. Tribe taught at Harvard Law School since 1968...hls.harvard.edu
J. Michael Luttig | Constitution Center
constitutioncenter.org
Alan Dershowitz slams GA indictment, says Trump used same tactics as Al Gore in 2000: not a ‘crime'
"We challenged the election, and we did much of the things that are being done today and people praised us. I wrote a bestselling book called ‘Supreme Injustice. Now they're making it a crime," Dershowitz said.
Dershowitz slams GA indictment, says Trump used same tactics as Al Gore in 2000: not a ‘crime'
Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, speaking to Fox News Digital, criticized the pending indictment, calling Trump’s actions "very similar" to that of Al Gore’s legal strategy in the Bush v. Gore case that decided the 2000 presidential election.
www.foxnews.com
The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,574
- 918
- Banned
- #144
You'd think the last word FOX would want to hear is "Discovery"....Discovery baby! That's what the Deep State does not want. Jack Smith has just opened up a can of worms with his bogus indictment.
Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: “We Will Re-litigate Every Single Issue in the 2020 Election”
Video in the link below. Brett Baier just got schooled by Trump's lawyer.
Trump Attorney John Lauro to FOX News: "We Will Re-litigate *Every Single Issue* in the 2020 Election" | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C.www.thegatewaypundit.com
The indictment of President Trump yesterday by Special Prosecutor Jack Smith in Washington D.C. revolves heavily around the unproven assertion that the 2020 Election was legitimate, free from fraud and that President Trump “knowingly” asserted “baseless claims” of election fraud.
President Trump’s team was constricted immensely by a ridiculously narrow window of just a few weeks to compile data from an obfuscated election system that was bolstered by unprecedented COVID-19 mail-in balloting rules put in place. It was reminiscent of the Wild, Wild West. And still, cases were brought, and quickly dismissed, typically using procedural justifications such as “standing” or “laches” before any evidentiary hearings or discovery was permitted.
The Gateway Pundit has documented numerous examples of unresolved issues and concerns from USPS employees appearing to stuff piles of ballots into drop boxes in Michigan, to two 4am deliveries in the backdoor of the TCF Center in Detroit, more than 20,000 ballots delivered after the deadline in Maricopa County, the mysterious disappearance of Jesse Morgan’s USPS trailer that he claims contained around 250,000 filled out mail-in ballots transported from NJ to PA, and “erroneous code” being found on almost every Georgia county who’s system log files were analyzed. And that’s a few examples with many, many more documented.
In fact, just yesterday The Gateway Pundit published a report from Erich Speckin, a 20-year veteran contractor with the State of Michigan who investigated the 2020 Election AVCB ballots in Detroit and found there could be upwards of 35,000 illegal ballots.
Now, given the wording and accusations levied in the indictment against President Trump, one of his attorneys, John Lauro, weighed on FOX News with Brett Baier:
The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,574
- 918
- Banned
- #145
Do you think no one knows who Al is?/----/ Here's your cue to attack someone who disagrees with you. Alan Morton Dershowitz (/ˈdɜːrʃəwɪts/ DURR-shə-wits; born September 1, 1938) is an American lawyer and former law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law.[1][2] From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993.[3][4] -Wikipedia
Alan Dershowitz slams GA indictment, says Trump used same tactics as Al Gore in 2000: not a ‘crime'
"We challenged the election, and we did much of the things that are being done today and people praised us. I wrote a bestselling book called ‘Supreme Injustice. Now they're making it a crime," Dershowitz said.
Dershowitz slams GA indictment, says Trump used same tactics as Al Gore in 2000: not a ‘crime'
Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz, speaking to Fox News Digital, criticized the pending indictment, calling Trump’s actions "very similar" to that of Al Gore’s legal strategy in the Bush v. Gore case that decided the 2000 presidential election.
The man is a fossil.
/—-/ So is dementia Joe and half the democRATs in Congress. Doesn’t stop you from kissing their feet.Do you think no one knows who Al is?
The man is a fossil.
Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,294
- 2,128
- 210
re-litigated means that it has been tried before. . There star witness will be the guy used in the Kari Lake trial.
She lost
The benefit for the prosecution is that they will now what works. The judge will think real hard does he want to re-litigated matters that were already resolved.
But Trump as the defendant has a right to a defense. If it did not work before then at least his lawyers will be paid. This guy they use will be paid.
Prosecution will just use the winning arguments in the previous cases.
its the Judge discretion to allows it and if their is already a verdict of what is being re-litgated then it will be the judges decision
They will be using the testimony of the same guy used in Kari Lakes trial
It didn't wok for Kari Lake,
The same guy used in the Michigan audit where the state did not authorized the audit but someone hire him to do an audit.
If this is Trumps defense , then the lawyer better ask for his money up front.
The prosecution will highlight all the failed attempts of proving the election was invalid. The Dominican case, Kari lake and all the election lies floated by Donald Trump. The case of the Georgia election workers who even won their case.
The lawyer is sounding tough but that is what they do. Doesn't mean that it will snow in hell.
After the star witness testimony
“We hear about these allegations, but what we don’t get is any definitive, specific information that’s actionable,”
.
Man Behind Sketchy ‘Audit’ of Pennsylvania’s Voting Machines Has Ties to Failed Arizona Recount
Sounds like a guy with a theory and a endless list of possibilities.
She lost
The benefit for the prosecution is that they will now what works. The judge will think real hard does he want to re-litigated matters that were already resolved.
But Trump as the defendant has a right to a defense. If it did not work before then at least his lawyers will be paid. This guy they use will be paid.
Prosecution will just use the winning arguments in the previous cases.
its the Judge discretion to allows it and if their is already a verdict of what is being re-litgated then it will be the judges decision
They will be using the testimony of the same guy used in Kari Lakes trial
It didn't wok for Kari Lake,
The same guy used in the Michigan audit where the state did not authorized the audit but someone hire him to do an audit.
If this is Trumps defense , then the lawyer better ask for his money up front.
The prosecution will highlight all the failed attempts of proving the election was invalid. The Dominican case, Kari lake and all the election lies floated by Donald Trump. The case of the Georgia election workers who even won their case.
The lawyer is sounding tough but that is what they do. Doesn't mean that it will snow in hell.
After the star witness testimony
“We hear about these allegations, but what we don’t get is any definitive, specific information that’s actionable,”
.
Man Behind Sketchy ‘Audit’ of Pennsylvania’s Voting Machines Has Ties to Failed Arizona Recount
Sounds like a guy with a theory and a endless list of possibilities.
Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,294
- 2,128
- 210
KA-CHINGThe only people who are bigger fraudsters than Donald Trump are his lawyers who convince him to "re-litigate" things which have no chance of success.
KA-CHING!
You know Trump has a lot of money, as his Florida location is worth 426 to 600 million according to him.
He good for it. Well if I was the lawyer , I would Demand money in advance. Re-litigate - I would ask all the money owed in advance.
Last edited:
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
Here you go. look at the things never investigated and not litigated at all. 5 states and 5 elections with 0 integrity. These are facts and no one can debunk them. They happened and were ignored and hidden by corrupt people from BOTH parties.re-litigated means that it has been tried before. . There star witness will be the guy used in the Kari Lake trial.
She lost
The benefit for the prosecution is that they will now what works. The judge will think real hard does he want to re-litigated matters that were already resolved.
But Trump as the defendant has a right to a defense. If it did not work before then at least his lawyers will be paid. This guy they use will be paid.
Prosecution will just use the winning arguments in the previous cases.
its the Judge discretion to allows it and if their is already a verdict of what is being re-litgated then it will be the judges decision
They will be using the testimony of the same guy used in Kari Lakes trial
It didn't wok for Kari Lake,
The same guy used in the Michigan audit where the state did not authorized the audit but someone hire him to do an audit.
If this is Trumps defense , then the lawyer better ask for his money up front.
The prosecution will highlight all the failed attempts of proving the election was invalid. The Dominican case, Kari lake and all the election lies floated by Donald Trump. The case of the Georgia election workers who even won their case.
The lawyer is sounding tough but that is what they do. Doesn't mean that it will snow in hell.
After the star witness testimony
“We hear about these allegations, but what we don’t get is any definitive, specific information that’s actionable,”
.
Man Behind Sketchy ‘Audit’ of Pennsylvania’s Voting Machines Has Ties to Failed Arizona Recount
Sounds like a guy with a theory and a endless list of possibilities.
Maricopa County utilized Dominion machines.
Six minutes after the polls closed at 7 p.m. November 3, Biden received a net gain
of 143,100 votes. Cyber Security expert witness, retired Col. Phil Waldron,
testified that such increase was a mathematical impossibility because there were
not enough machines in use to process that many votes in that short amount of
time.
The Dominion voting machines were connected to the internet, thereby
completely violating all security mandates
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
GEORGIA
(16 Electoral votes: 12,670 vote gap*)
Georgia law allows federal elections to be contested under specific provisions if
sufficient to change or place doubt in the result. The relevant provisions are 1) if there
was misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by election officials and 2) when illegal votes have
been received or legal votes rejected.
Georgia officials allowed approximately 100,000 unqualified persons to register
and cast votes that are illegal under the above provisions as follows:
66,247 Underage persons allowed to register illegally, then voted
8,718 Potential number of persons deceased prior to the date the state
records accept votes, relying on available records re: name and birth
year. Only the Secretary of State has the full birthdate information to
ascertain the exact number of illegal votes cast in the name of
deceased persons. Witness affidavits show that absentee ballots
were sent to dead persons in Georgia
2,560 Felons
2,423 Unregistered persons
4,926 Persons registered in another state after moving from Georgia
1,043 Persons registered using a P.O Box, not a legal residence
15,700 Persons who had filed a national change of address with the USPS as
having relocated to another state prior to Election Day, and
40,279 Persons who moved without reregistering/ voting in their new county.
GEORGIA
(16 Electoral votes: 12,670 vote gap*)
Georgia law allows federal elections to be contested under specific provisions if
sufficient to change or place doubt in the result. The relevant provisions are 1) if there
was misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by election officials and 2) when illegal votes have
been received or legal votes rejected.
Secretary of State Raffensperger violated Georgia law, which requires voters to
request absentee ballots, no earlier than 180 days before the election for which the
absentee ballot is requested
(16 Electoral votes: 12,670 vote gap*)
Georgia law allows federal elections to be contested under specific provisions if
sufficient to change or place doubt in the result. The relevant provisions are 1) if there
was misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by election officials and 2) when illegal votes have
been received or legal votes rejected.
Georgia officials allowed approximately 100,000 unqualified persons to register
and cast votes that are illegal under the above provisions as follows:
66,247 Underage persons allowed to register illegally, then voted
8,718 Potential number of persons deceased prior to the date the state
records accept votes, relying on available records re: name and birth
year. Only the Secretary of State has the full birthdate information to
ascertain the exact number of illegal votes cast in the name of
deceased persons. Witness affidavits show that absentee ballots
were sent to dead persons in Georgia
2,560 Felons
2,423 Unregistered persons
4,926 Persons registered in another state after moving from Georgia
1,043 Persons registered using a P.O Box, not a legal residence
15,700 Persons who had filed a national change of address with the USPS as
having relocated to another state prior to Election Day, and
40,279 Persons who moved without reregistering/ voting in their new county.
GEORGIA
(16 Electoral votes: 12,670 vote gap*)
Georgia law allows federal elections to be contested under specific provisions if
sufficient to change or place doubt in the result. The relevant provisions are 1) if there
was misconduct, fraud, or irregularity by election officials and 2) when illegal votes have
been received or legal votes rejected.
Secretary of State Raffensperger violated Georgia law, which requires voters to
request absentee ballots, no earlier than 180 days before the election for which the
absentee ballot is requested
Last edited:
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
MICHIGAN
More than 100 Michigan credentialed challengers provided affidavits describing
the numerous methods used by Democrat-controlled Wayne County to deny them
a meaningful opportunity to carry out the election duties described above. Some
of these methods include the following:
- Most of the challengers designated by the Republican Party or Republican
candidate were denied access to the TCF Center (formerly Cobo Hall)
while all Democratic challengers were allowed access.
- Those few Republicans who were admitted were not allowed sufficiently
near the vote counting process to have meaningful observation of it.
- Those few Republicans who were admitted were forced to remain at least
six feet from the vote counting process but Democrat challengers were not
forced to remain behind such a barrier
- At least three challengers swore Wayne County election officials physically
pushed them away from the counting tables so they could not meaningfully
observe the vote count.
- Many challengers swore they were threatened and harassed by Wayne
County election officials, including being called “a racist name.”
- One challenger observed Democrat challengers sharing a packet of
information entitled “Tactics to Distract GOP Challengers.”
- An election official told a challenger that Wayne County had a police
SWAT team outside the building if Republican challengers argued too
much.
- Another election official told a challenger that “since English was not [her]
first language…[she] should not be taking part in this process.”
- Whenever a Republican challenger was ejected from the counting area,
Wayne County election officials would cheer
Wayne County election officials ran batches of ballots through the vote tabulation
machines-some multiple times.
One challenger observed a stack of about 50 ballots being fed “multiple times”
into a ballot scanner machine.
An affidavit filed by elections worker Jessy Jacob swears she was trained by
officials from Detroit and the state of Michigan, both Democrat-controlled
entities. She avers she:
More than 100 Michigan credentialed challengers provided affidavits describing
the numerous methods used by Democrat-controlled Wayne County to deny them
a meaningful opportunity to carry out the election duties described above. Some
of these methods include the following:
- Most of the challengers designated by the Republican Party or Republican
candidate were denied access to the TCF Center (formerly Cobo Hall)
while all Democratic challengers were allowed access.
- Those few Republicans who were admitted were not allowed sufficiently
near the vote counting process to have meaningful observation of it.
- Those few Republicans who were admitted were forced to remain at least
six feet from the vote counting process but Democrat challengers were not
forced to remain behind such a barrier
- At least three challengers swore Wayne County election officials physically
pushed them away from the counting tables so they could not meaningfully
observe the vote count.
- Many challengers swore they were threatened and harassed by Wayne
County election officials, including being called “a racist name.”
- One challenger observed Democrat challengers sharing a packet of
information entitled “Tactics to Distract GOP Challengers.”
- An election official told a challenger that Wayne County had a police
SWAT team outside the building if Republican challengers argued too
much.
- Another election official told a challenger that “since English was not [her]
first language…[she] should not be taking part in this process.”
- Whenever a Republican challenger was ejected from the counting area,
Wayne County election officials would cheer
Wayne County election officials ran batches of ballots through the vote tabulation
machines-some multiple times.
One challenger observed a stack of about 50 ballots being fed “multiple times”
into a ballot scanner machine.
An affidavit filed by elections worker Jessy Jacob swears she was trained by
officials from Detroit and the state of Michigan, both Democrat-controlled
entities. She avers she:
- was trained to pre-date ballots,
- was instructed not to ask a voter for any photo ID,
- was instructed not to look for any deficiencies in the ballots nor to compare
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
The point here is that the elections were run like shit and had 0 integrity. State officials knew all of this and still certified the elections in 5 states. How?
The only people who are bigger fraudsters than Donald Trump are his lawyers who convince him to "re-litigate" things which have no chance of success.
KA-CHING!
I'm going through litigation with a guy who has taken me to court 4 times and lost every single time because, like Trump, neither the facts nor the law are on his side. He's provide no evidence of any of his claims, while I've arrived at court with evidence of everything I've said.
re-litigated means that it has been tried before. . There star witness will be the guy used in the Kari Lake trial.
She lost
The benefit for the prosecution is that they will now what works. The judge will think real hard does he want to re-litigated matters that were already resolved.
But Trump as the defendant has a right to a defense. If it did not work before then at least his lawyers will be paid. This guy they use will be paid.
Prosecution will just use the winning arguments in the previous cases.
its the Judge discretion to allows it and if their is already a verdict of what is being re-litgated then it will be the judges decision
They will be using the testimony of the same guy used in Kari Lakes trial
It didn't wok for Kari Lake,
The same guy used in the Michigan audit where the state did not authorized the audit but someone hire him to do an audit.
If this is Trumps defense , then the lawyer better ask for his money up front.
The prosecution will highlight all the failed attempts of proving the election was invalid. The Dominican case, Kari lake and all the election lies floated by Donald Trump. The case of the Georgia election workers who even won their case.
The lawyer is sounding tough but that is what they do. Doesn't mean that it will snow in hell.
After the star witness testimony
“We hear about these allegations, but what we don’t get is any definitive, specific information that’s actionable,”
.
Man Behind Sketchy ‘Audit’ of Pennsylvania’s Voting Machines Has Ties to Failed Arizona Recount
Sounds like a guy with a theory and a endless list of possibilities.
There are numerous legal problems with this idea. The first problem is that whether the election was "stolen" is irrelevant to the crimes Trump and company committed. Even if they could prove every one of their claims of election fraud, what Trump did was still fraudulent, and illegal.
So there is simply no point in presenting evidence that Trump won the election, because it's not a legal defense to his crimes.
The prosecution will simply present evidence of the crimes Trump committed, and Trump will try to claim he committed crimes because the election was stolen.
(a) The prosecution doesn't have to prove that the election wasn't stolen, only that Trump used illegal methods to stop the certification;
(b) No competent attorney would even attempt to present such a defense since the veracity of the election is not at issue to the charges.
Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,294
- 2,128
- 210
All your points are valid and that why his statements are so ludicrous.I'm going through litigation with a guy who has taken me to court 4 times and lost every single time because, like Trump, neither the facts nor the law are on his side. He's provide no evidence of any of his claims, while I've arrived at court with evidence of everything I've said.
There are numerous legal problems with this idea. The first problem is that whether the election was "stolen" is irrelevant to the crimes Trump and company committed. Even if they could prove every one of their claims of election fraud, what Trump did was still fraudulent, and illegal.
So there is simply no point in presenting evidence that Trump won the election, because it's not a legal defense to his crimes.
The prosecution will simply present evidence of the crimes Trump committed, and Trump will try to claim he committed crimes because the election was stolen.
(a) The prosecution doesn't have to prove that the election wasn't stolen, only that Trump used illegal methods to stop the certification;
(b) No competent attorney would even attempt to present such a defense since the veracity of the election is not at issue to the charges.
Well his lawyers have to present a defense. The defense mention sounds like the lawyer is trying to appease Trump and give him what he really wants. Trump will never get over the previous election and it will bother him for the rest of his life. That makes me happy.
He is in trouble and I can't see him winning a single case.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
The reason Trump cannot get over it is because the election was stolen from him. I posted what went on in 5 swing states. Those elections never should have been certified.All your points are valid and that why his statements are so ludicrous.
Well his lawyers have to present a defense. The defense mention sounds like the lawyer is trying to appease Trump and give him what he really wants. Trump will never get over the previous election and it will bother him for the rest of his life. That makes me happy.
He is in trouble and I can't see him winning a single case.
The Steal was in 6-8 Counties in 5 statesThe reason Trump cannot get over it is because the election was stolen from him. I posted what went on in 5 swing states. Those elections never should have been certified.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,403
- 51,757
- 3,600
Yes it was.The Steal was in 6-8 Counties in 5 states
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,029
- 33,239
- 2,300
Nut jobsYes it was.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 207
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 550
- Replies
- 31
- Views
- 558
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 362
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 56
- Views
- 247
- Replies
- 687
- Views
- 7K
- Replies
- 598
- Views
- 6K
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-