As Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling To It More Desperately Than Ever
Ummm, nope.
It is not 'crumbling' per the Glen Greenwald article the poster
"Thoth" links us to.
Greenwald attempts to build a case for "no insurrection" because subsequent anticipated events ....the storming of the 50 state capitols, a disruption of the January 20th Inauguration, and QAnon's March 4th fantasy.....never happened. Therefore, it couldn't have been an Insurrection January 6th.
He writes about Collins, a journalist with NBC News, suggesting Collins who had been
reporting on the lead-up to the non-event events noted above as a 'cult leader' (?!)
"This is how apocalyptic cult leaders always function. When the end of the world did not materialize on January 6, Collins insisted that January 20 was the day of the violent reckoning. When nothing happened on that day, he moved the Doomsday Date to March 4. The flock cannot remain in a state of confusion for too long about why the world has not ended as promised by the prophet, so a new date must quickly be provided with an explanation for why this is serious business this time.
He describes the Times as uselessly warning about attacks that never came. But ignoring the real world reality that the Times was
'reporting' what the authorities had publicly stated
So, if poster 'Thoth' wishes to argue that because Glen Greenwald, a right-wing blogger, writes that non-riots on subsequent days means there was none on January 6th.....well, I personally, struggle to find that persuasive.