Trump Administration to go after Colleges that discriminate against whites

[jasonnfree]

white college grad males voted 53% for Trump and 44% of white college grad women.

Um not according to this data:

View attachment 141773

A New York exit pol? Yea, sure that represents the entire United States.

In the meantime, answer the question. Why do you want to flood the country with the uneducated?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Why bother? Republicans don't believe in higher education. That's why they want immigrants with degrees.

That's a contradiction in terms you ******* idiot. And FYI white college grad males voted 53% for Trump and 44% of white college grad women.

You call me a ******* idiot and you don't know what you are talking about you dumb ******* shit.

Behind Trump’s victory: Divisions by race, gender, education

In the 2016 election, a wide gap in presidential preferences emerged between those with and without a college degree. College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. This is by far the widest gap in support among college graduates and non-college graduates in exit polls dating back to 1980.

DIPLOMA DUMBOS

I can infer that you think college graduates are smarter, but they are actually dumbed down narrow-minded conformists, suceptible to being spoonfed unrealistic and self-righteous fantasies by their sheltered escapist professors. Only stupid people think that such stunted mental growth makes people smart.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Um yes according to that data you stupid **** but you didn't post the right data:

Well at least I got you can post your link. But learn how to quote. It detracts from your point and makes you look stupid when you don't quote properly..
Especially when you call others stupid.

Can't quote from that source dipshit.

 

[Darkwind]

As it turns out it has nothing to do with whites. It's Chinese.

Well, Asians.

Funny thing is, this all stems from a help wanted ad to clear up some left over business from the Obama administration.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Blacks, Bluebloods, and Brownnoses


College is an obsolete institution designed solely for spoiled brats living off trust funds. To develop the best human resources, it must be replaced by highly paid professional training. Under the present class-biased indentured servitude, every college student could be replaced by someone smarter who doesn't go to college. Our A students are really B students, our B students are really C students, and the rest never should have been admitted to college at all.

Rats can be trained by rote; core requirements at the U. do not develop Stepford Students, they develop sagacious students and erudite adults.

Anyone who adheres to political correctness, like you and most modern liberals do, are not capable of being either sagacious or erudite.

What? You use a talking point with no proof and expect others to find that credible?

What "political correctness" do you find in my point? That a Freshman in a 4-year college or U. takes a required coursework geared to lean to read with comprehension, think clearly, logically and write expository essays??

One thing you should understand is that using talking points as an ad hominem does not reflect your ability to write a rebuttal; in the future you might consider that truth; nothing in your post was thoughtful or thought provoking,

 

[JimBowie1958]

Why bother? Republicans don't believe in higher education. That's why they want immigrants with degrees.

The Republican Establishment you mean, and a handfull of Libertarian Open Borders wack jobs.

 

[JQPublic1]

Um yes according to that data you stupid **** but you didn't post the right data:

Well at least I got you can post your link. But learn how to quote. It detracts from your point and makes you look stupid when you don't quote properly..
Especially when you call others stupid.

Can't quote from that source dipshit.

Nevermind...you just admitted you don't even know what quoting is...damn...what a shitbird you are...fowl mouth and all. Pecking at trivial pursuits
While the op suffers.

 

[JQPublic1]

After a mild distraction I'll get back on topic. From my perspective, Trump is doing exactly what we all expected him to do. The extremist populism that he represents is that of right-wing white males who have long been angry about any progress towards equality so-called minorities and white women have made over the years. They completely ignore that affirmative action has benefitted white women and Asians more than Blacks. Without it, the doors to the best educational and employment opportunities might still be reserved for white males only.


Although Trump's conservatism is questionable, he holds the same hegemonic world view that permeates
the minds of low ranking konservatives.. He, in fact, identifies as the leader of those who harbor such
selfish and dangerous notions. What would you expect from a birther?

 

[busybee01]

Where are these great masses of whites that are being discriminated against? The Supreme Court ruling in the Bakke case made sense. You can't use quotas but you can give points for being a minority. Why not get rid of all preferences including ones that benefit whites? I suspect that Sessions is behind this. It seems like the thoughtless thing he would do.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Blacks, Bluebloods, and Brownnoses


College is an obsolete institution designed solely for spoiled brats living off trust funds. To develop the best human resources, it must be replaced by highly paid professional training. Under the present class-biased indentured servitude, every college student could be replaced by someone smarter who doesn't go to college. Our A students are really B students, our B students are really C students, and the rest never should have been admitted to college at all.

Rats can be trained by rote; core requirements at the U. do not develop Stepford Students, they develop sagacious students and erudite adults.

Anyone who adheres to political correctness, like you and most modern liberals do, are not capable of being either sagacious or erudite.

What? You use a talking point with no proof and expect others to find that credible?

What "political correctness" do you find in my point? That a Freshman in a 4-year college or U. takes a required coursework geared to lean to read with comprehension, think clearly, logically and write expository essays??

One thing you should understand is that using talking points as an ad hominem does not reflect your ability to write a rebuttal; in the future you might consider that truth; nothing in your post was thoughtful or thought provoking,

Avoid confusing verbal constructions. Although it is quickly clarified, that's no excuse for being temporarily misleading by using "consider that truth," which is normally used with something like "consider that truth is a rare thing these days" rather than your pattern of "consider that truth; it is more relevant than this truth."

 

[Conservative65]

Where are these great masses of whites that are being discriminated against? The Supreme Court ruling in the Bakke case made sense. You can't use quotas but you can give points for being a minority. Why not get rid of all preferences including ones that benefit whites? I suspect that Sessions is behind this. It seems like the thoughtless thing he would do.

What preferences are in place that benefit whites? You said you agree with points being given because of someone being a minority. How many points under programs like AA are given to whites?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Blacks, Bluebloods, and Brownnoses


College is an obsolete institution designed solely for spoiled brats living off trust funds. To develop the best human resources, it must be replaced by highly paid professional training. Under the present class-biased indentured servitude, every college student could be replaced by someone smarter who doesn't go to college. Our A students are really B students, our B students are really C students, and the rest never should have been admitted to college at all.

Rats can be trained by rote; core requirements at the U. do not develop Stepford Students, they develop sagacious students and erudite adults.

Anyone who adheres to political correctness, like you and most modern liberals do, are not capable of being either sagacious or erudite.

What? You use a talking point with no proof and expect others to find that credible?

What "political correctness" do you find in my point? That a Freshman in a 4-year college or U. takes a required coursework geared to lean to read with comprehension, think clearly, logically and write expository essays??

One thing you should understand is that using talking points as an ad hominem does not reflect your ability to write a rebuttal; in the future you might consider that truth; nothing in your post was thoughtful or thought provoking,

Avoid confusing verbal constructions. Although it is quickly clarified, that's no excuse for being temporarily misleading by using "consider that truth," which is normally used with something like "consider that truth is a rare thing these days" rather than your pattern of "consider that truth; it is more relevant than this truth."

"That truth" conveys the meaning that an ad hominem is not a rebuttal, logically a sound conclusion: , "All ad homineme's are attacks;
"No attacks are Rebuttals;
Thus, no Ad Hominem is a Rebuttal.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

A Non Sequitur is worse than an Ad Hominem. You are so fixated on your ideology that you responded to a non-partisan post about word usage as you would have to an attack on your logic. But this truth can be useful to both sides.