Trump. Abortions no longer a major issue and other related issues.

[rampart]

It's a done deal since the Supreme Court threw out Roe v Wade. Why are democrat activists so afraid of allowing American citizens to determine their own future regarding the killing of the unborn? Does it go back to the Wilson and Hitler concept of eugenics?

because american citizens won't be determining much.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Actually you aren't seeing the actual issue in your scenario, which would be so many people supporting abortion bans they vote in enough abortion ban supporters to make an amendment banning abortion possible.

That’s not what the demographics are on abortion. At least not at the moment.

You know damn well that wouldn’t stop you guys from pushing a national abortion ban if you get the red wave you want.

Democrats need to show up and vote. Because you lying assholes WILL push a national abortion ban if you get the chance to.

 

[martybegan]

That’s not what the demographics are on abortion. At least not at the moment.

You know damn well that wouldn’t stop you guys from pushing a national abortion ban if you get the red wave you want.

Democrats need to show up and vote. Because you lying assholes WILL push a national abortion ban if you get the chance to.

A "Red Wave" of Republicans would have many that don't include any federal regulations on Abortion. Your scenario is impossible unless the vast majority of the country WANTS a national abortion ban, enough to make it happen via amendment.

More scaremongering because your party can't run on illegal immigration, rampant crime, child mutilation and AGW induced lowering of our standards of living.

 

[whitehall]

because american citizens won't be determining much.

How does that work? Americans will have the voting right to determine if citizens have the will to kill unborn citizens. What's the problem?

 

[rampart]

You clearly have not been paying attention.

“Ohio bans abortion in 2022, or let’s say 2024. And then, you know, every day George Soros sends a 747 to Columbus to load up disproportionately Black women to get them to go have abortions in California. And of course, the left will celebrate this as a victory for diversity – uh, that’s kind of creepy.”

How does that work? Americans will have the voting right to determine if citizens have the will to kill unborn citizens. What's the problem?

not at all

it is not votes that count, it is whoever counts the votes. " stalin

the plot forthe "independent state legislatures" to kick this into congress on a 1 state 1 vote basis is well known. there was a dry run a few years ago and they have pulled it off at the county level .just sayin - the court did not kick this issue back to the people ., did they?

 

[XponentialChaos]

A "Red Wave" of Republicans would have many that don't include any federal regulations on Abortion. Your scenario is impossible unless the vast majority of the country WANTS a national abortion ban, enough to make it happen via amendment.

More scaremongering because your party can't run on illegal immigration, rampant crime, child mutilation and AGW induced lowering of our standards of living.

It will happen if you guys get a super majority. Period.

 

[martybegan]

It will happen if you guys get a super majority. Period.

No, it won't. First we won't get it, 2nd, the moderates in the party wouldn't allow it.

And like I said, if enough people who want a full ban manage to elect people who would vote on a full ban, they would have enough support to amend the Constitution.

At that point you are left with going to the barricades.

 

[XponentialChaos]

No, it won't. First we won't get it, 2nd, the moderates in the party wouldn't allow it.

First, hence the word if. It will happen if you guys get a super majority.

Second, Republicans aren’t going to defend abortion rights if they have a super majority. That’s just plain stupid if you expect me to believe that.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Abortion is no longer a federal issue. Terrorist democrats might want to fuck out that Trump wants to ban abortion federally, but that's not even possible no matter who would want to. The Supreme Court has spoken. It's state's rights, as it should have been all along.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Trump's dead on. Let the States decide, it was the antidote, and everyone needs to shut the fuck up about it. There are two good sides to the debate.

A. Should the individual decide without consent from anyone involved, because it's her body? Maybe. His too in left terms, wait, that's a woman, wait.

VS.

B. They're killing humans. Their own, no other mammal does this. It conflicts with the very foundation of our country as well, life, liberty and happiness. Perhaps a person should consider consequences? Don't pull the rape and medical card, those are anomaly's.

BTW, mothers who give up their babies to adoption are less happy than those who raise them. Including those who raise them despite genetic disorders. End a child's life, your own, then you have to live with it. No level of denial will escape that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Trump seems to understand that abortion is a losing issue for Republicans but he is wrong, it's going to be a big deal still.

True.

Trump is as usual wrong.

 

[martybegan]

First, hence the word if. It will happen if you guys get a super majority.

Second, Republicans aren’t going to defend abortion rights if they have a super majority. That’s just plain stupid if you expect me to believe that.

No, it' will not. Too many current Republicans don't support full bans at the national level.

It's stupid for you to think your scenario can actually happen. Again, for that level of majority it would have to be a national wave of WANTING abortion bans, so much so an amendment doing so would be on the table.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

No, it' will not. Too many current Republicans don't support full bans at the national level.

It's stupid for you to think your scenario can actually happen. Again, for that level of majority it would have to be a national wave of WANTING abortion bans, so much so an amendment doing so would be on the table.

Liberals don't think, they just squawk, squawk, squawk, liberal talk.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

because american citizens won't be determining much.

They get to vote. They get to set their own parameters for child murder. What’s wrong with that?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It will happen if you guys get a super majority. Period.

You’re worried about something that can’t happen. It’s a state issue now. The court made it their problem.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

They get to vote. They get to set their own parameters for child murder. What’s wrong with that?

Not anymore. Kamala was installed without one.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Not anymore. Kamala was installed without one.

The party desperately trying to save democracy doesn’t really practice it.

 

[Lesh]

We've all won. Abortion is a state issue and voters decide. Nobody can lose. Nobody.

You mean except the women who are forced to bear kids they don’t want, can’t afford, or aren’t capable of parenting

 

[Lesh]

That’s not what the demographics are on abortion. At least not at the moment.

You know damn well that wouldn’t stop you guys from pushing a national abortion ban if you get the red wave you want.

Democrats need to show up and vote. Because you lying assholes WILL push a national abortion ban if you get the chance to.

Just like what happened with Roe.

Republicans SWORE a decided issue. That Roe would never be overturned

Bullshit of course

 

[IDIOCRACY]

Just like what happened with Roe.

Republicans SWORE a decided issue. That Roe would never be overturned

Bullshit of course

Ha ha, "they" changed their mind (Kavanaugh). Progression, I thought you guys liked that. They made the right decision, ROE/WADE never should have advanced anyway, sends the wrong message.