Blisterfinger is the one who messaged me first about his fantasies about enjoying watching my friends get deported and yet can't name a single one. If you people are going to fantasize about me why shouldn't I be entertained by it?
What does the 1950s have to do with anything?
Why do you morons seem to have trouble addressing me and not these fantasies?
The Daily Show makes fun of Presidential candidates all the time with hilarious edits. Is that election interference? Do you morons even know what that is? It's the interfering of the election process. Having commentary or edits or putting an edited video of the President tripping down the stairs to some dub step on tik tok or CNN is called freedom of speech you morons.
You know who has the right to sue if they think their words were edited out of context? Kamala Harris. Not Donald Trump. Why would Donald Trump be the one to get to decide that Harris was taken out of context? That don't even make no fucking sense.
It doesn’t, it’s just where your race baiting mind is stuckBlisterfinger is the one who messaged me first about his fantasies about enjoying watching my friends get deported and yet can't name a single one. If you people are going to fantasize about me why shouldn't I be entertained by it?
What does the 1950s have to do with anything?
The Daily Show is a cable comedy show not claiming to be news nor is it a broadcast networkThe Daily Show makes fun of Presidential candidates all the time with hilarious edits. Is that election interference? Do you morons even know what that is? It's the interfering of the election process. Having commentary or edits or putting an edited video of the President tripping down the stairs to some dub step on tik tok or CNN is called freedom of speech you morons.
She wasn’t taken out of context her words were edited to say something differentYou know who has the right to sue if they think their words were edited out of context? Kamala Harris. Not Donald Trump. Why would Donald Trump be the one to get to decide that Harris was taken out of context? That don't even make no fucking sense.
You are claiming now you are not happy that joe (the idiot) biden opened our border for mass illegal migration?Name one.
What pain? What friends? You've imagined all of that. Replacement isn't a theory you morons, it's just a cold hard fact about birth rates for the last two decades.
The pain of failure. That is what you are and have done, as all racists eventually do. You are not special.What pain? What friends? You've imagined all of that. Replacement isn't a theory you morons, it's just a cold hard fact about birth rates for the last two decades.
(metaphorically speaking dumbass)You have failed. Just go back to your little bodega and shut up. Deportation, bitch
The cbs news is not a comedy show imbecile .The Daily Show makes fun of Presidential candidates all the time with hilarious edits. Is that election interference? Do you morons even know what that is? It's the interfering of the election process. Having commentary or edits or putting an edited video of the President tripping down the stairs to some dub step on tik tok or CNN is called freedom of speech you morons.
My mind is here in 2025. You think there were many people who wanted to or thought it possible to, replace whites in the 1950s?
It doesn't matter what kind of show it is. CNN is under no obligation to make a news show you take seriously and the daily show can be a source of news to people who like to laugh while being informed. I think Fox is a joke, does that mean they have to shut down now?
Even if that were true, so what? It would be Kamala Harris' place to decide to sue if she thought she was edited out of context to the point of libel or defamation.
What's the law that was broken?
Because the people who own the company have a giant merger that is pending. That's the problem when corporations owning news programs and a society where everyone is more concerned with making money than arriving at the truth. That's the irony of all this. They might settle and in so doing give the impression that Trump had some sort of point when they just didn't care about Trump trying to stick them for a few mill in the middle of a merger that is going to make them billions.
Let's say CNN was trying to help her. What's even illegal about that? What law says they can't?
1) sounds like itMy mind is here in 2025. You think there were many people who wanted to or thought it possible to, replace whites in the 1950s?
It doesn't matter what kind of show it is. CNN is under no obligation to make a news show you take seriously and the daily show can be a source of news to people who like to laugh while being informed. I think Fox is a joke, does that mean they have to shut down now?
Even if that were true, so what? It would be Kamala Harris' place to decide to sue if she thought she was edited out of context to the point of libel or defamation.
What's the law that was broken?
Because the people who own the company have a giant merger that is pending. That's the problem when corporations owning news programs and a society where everyone is more concerned with making money than arriving at the truth. That's the irony of all this. They might settle and in so doing give the impression that Trump had some sort of point when they just didn't care about Trump trying to stick them for a few mill in the middle of a merger that is going to make them billions.
Let's say CNN was trying to help her. What's even illegal about that? What law says they can't?
1. He didn't. He made it easier for people to immigrate legally.
Dipshit, what failure?The pain of failure. That is what you are and have done, as all racists eventually do. You are not special.
All your friends!
Even struth acknowledges white demographic decline and replacement. The demographic replacement of whites has already been a success. For two decades now. Read a census you moron. I'm here chilling in my house in my gated community of Pembroke Pines next to my Jamaican and Cuban and Columbian and Haitian neighbors, in my minority majority city.You have failed. Just go back to your little bodega and shut up. Deportation, bitch
Who gives a shit. It's a private entity that gets to produce whatever speech it feels like.
I do not subscript to your racist replacement theory, you liar1. He didn't. He made it easier for people to immigrate legally.
2. That did make me happy. What would make me even happier are open borders all together. That still doesn't mean I know any illegals personally or are friends with them or that I'm worried you deporting a handful is going to disrupt white demographic replacement because I'm simply not and you pretending I am is just frail and funny.
Dipshit, what failure?
I'm here chilling in my house in my gated community of Pembroke Pines next to my Jamaican and Cuban and Columbian and Haitian neighbors, in my minority majority city.
Who gives a shit. It's a private entity that gets to produce whatever speech it feels like.
Sounds like what? Are you hearing sounds over your internet connection?
What news did they distort? Do you even know? The edited their own interview.
What's the actual distortion? Detail it.
Paramount to Turn Over Records on Skydance Deal Amid Standoff With FCC
So what's the distortion? This is just Trump being salty puss.
What theory you dipshit? I don't have a racist theory. I have laughter for the ongoing white replacement that is actually occurring.
1) sounds like your stuck in 1950 with your racist view's
Replacement theory is racist rhetoric
Thanks for sharing your feelings with me I guess?
See, if we just let you morons talk enough you tell on yourselves. ^ This isn't about accurately reporting the news. They didn't purposefully miss indentify an active shooter, they just didn't make Kamala look as stupid as you wanted her to and for that you think there should be legal consequences. Why are yall too pussy to just say that?
So basically a news report saying exactly what I said.
That's not an answer. You're basically telling me that they cut out a bit of rambling in her answer and you think that should be illegal because it doesn't embarrass her as much as you think it could. That's your dipshit argument.
That's not a violation of falsely reporting the news you fuckwit.
What replacement theory you moron? Do you know what the replacement theory even is? Doesn't sound like you do.
1) you askedThanks for sharing your feelings with me I guess?
See, if we just let you morons talk enough you tell on yourselves. ^ This isn't about accurately reporting the news. They didn't purposefully miss indentify an active shooter, they just didn't make Kamala look as stupid as you wanted her to and for that you think there should be legal consequences. Why are yall too pussy to just say that?
So basically a news report saying exactly what I said.
That's not an answer. You're basically telling me that they cut out a bit of rambling in her answer and you think that should be illegal because it doesn't embarrass her as much as you think it could. That's your dipshit argument.
Haha the one you’ve going on aboutWhat replacement theory you moron? Do you know what the replacement theory even is? Doesn't sound like you do.
