Meathead
Diamond Member
No, but that's what the Dems were saying and some idiots like yourself agreed, then proceed to calling him a lame duck.Would you support that?
Doesn't make much sense, does it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, but that's what the Dems were saying and some idiots like yourself agreed, then proceed to calling him a lame duck.Would you support that?
That's his plan and has been for a while.Haven't you heard it's the end of democracy and he'll be president for life, succeeded in turn by Don Jr and then Barron?
I'm basing what I'm saying off what he previously said and done. Also on US and world history.No, but that's what the Dems were saying and some idiots like yourself agreed, then proceed to calling him a lame duck.
Doesn't make much sense, does it?
I don't get it. You can't have it both ways, at least if you understand the political term "lame duck".Donnie is a lame duck President, so good luck with that.
He is not back in the WH until 1/20/25.I don't get it. You can't have it both ways, at least if you understand the political term "lame duck".
If Garland were what you folks claim he is, Trump would have been convicted and sentenced long agoPerhaps there is more than one plan for Gaetz and making sure the Attorney General person nominated is on Trump's side like Garland is for Joe and the Progs. Trump saying this is the direction I am heading and what I want.
Who should Trump nominate for his cabinet positions?If Garland were what you folks claim he is, Trump would have been convicted and sentenced long ago
Like end the filibuster? Still want to do that?Daddy Trump can do anything he wants, dontcha know?