TRR: Allen West Seeks Recount Amid Growing Vote Count Scandal

[Synthaholic]

Since the recount went over the deadline, we'll never know, will we?

A recount in Florida that didn't get finished in time? Say it ain't so!

I know, right? Democrats dragging their feet. That NEVER happens.

Florida is run by Republicans.

 

[Synthaholic]

Since the recount went over the deadline, we'll never know, will we?

Oh, wait, I forgot -- your definition of "fair election" is "an election where the Democrat wins".

I knew you would pussy out. It's what you do.

Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?

NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.

So you won't admit that it's a fair election?

Has any evidence of fraud been proven?

 

[Synthaholic]

I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".

Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.

Quoted for truth!

 

[daveman]

A recount in Florida that didn't get finished in time? Say it ain't so!

I know, right? Democrats dragging their feet. That NEVER happens.

Florida is run by Republicans.

And St Lucie County's supervisor of elections? Is she a Republican?

 

[daveman]

I knew you would pussy out. It's what you do.

Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?

NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.

So you won't admit that it's a fair election?

Has any evidence of fraud been proven?

"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"

Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.

 

[daveman]

I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".

Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.

Quoted for truth!

Then you quoted the wrong post.

Hey, who won Florida and Ohio in 2004?

 

[CandySlice]

I await for Dave to be consistent and declare that every other sort-of close election also needs a total recount in order to be called "fair". Oh wait. That would require Dave to be consistent. So it's not going to happen. He'll only be cherrypicking this single election as "possibly not a fair win".

Now, a liberal will simply look at the recount law, see if it applies, and if it does, support the recount, no matter who is ahead. It's that consistency thing, the thing which defines liberals. Alas, to those on the kook fringe right, any win by a Democrat is illegitimate by definition, so any tactic is justifiable to overturn the win, such as asking for special exemptions from recount laws that no other candidate gets. And if they can't overturn the election, they'll pout and question legitimacy of it.

Reeeaaalllly? Is that like the squawk you libs DIDN'T put up in 2004?? The Bush recount? My goodness! How soon we forget.
You people are either the biggest phonies in the world or the biggest liars.

 

[Synthaholic]

Pussy out? Of what? Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?

NOTE: Leftist wishful thinking is NOT conclusive evidence. I know that comes as a shock to you.

So you won't admit that it's a fair election?

Has any evidence of fraud been proven?

"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"

Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.

What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?

You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.

 

[daveman]

So you won't admit that it's a fair election?

Has any evidence of fraud been proven?

"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"

Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.

What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?

You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.

Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.

But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.

Right?

 

[Katzndogz]

Democrat democracy means it's a fair election if a democrat wins, no matter how much fraud was involved. If a republican wins, it's an unfair election even if no fraud was involved at all.

 

[Synthaholic]

"Did I have an obligation to make a statement that has not been conclusively proven accurate?"

Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue. That tactic's popular with those of your mental age.

What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?

You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.

Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.

But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.

Right?

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

 

[Dot Com]

What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?

You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.

Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.

But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.

Right?

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

he HAS to. He started this FAILthread

 

[Synthaholic]

Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.

But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.

Right?

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

he HAS to. He started this FAILthread

daveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.

Then, since they didn't do a recount, daveman insists that they are cheating.

Then, once they start recounting and Murphy racks up an even larger lead, West concedes, but daveman still bitterly clings to Democrats cheating because they didn't do a recount.


Fucking hilarious!

 

[Dot Com]

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

he HAS to. He started this FAILthread

daveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.

Then, since they didn't do a recount, daveman insists that they are cheating.

Then, once they start recounting and Murphy racks up an even larger lead, West concedes, but daveman still bitterly clings to Democrats cheating because they didn't do a recount.


Fucking hilarious!

that about sums it up

 

[Dick Tuck]

Allen West

Worst Congressman in history.....one and done

Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress

22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".

Moron.

Yeah, he wound up paying a $5,000 fine for his crimes, and forced into retirement. Moron.

 

[daveman]

What's your definition of "conclusively proven accurate"?

You'll never believe a Democrat, so you will continue to question it's validity.

Completing the recount that wasn't completed would be a good start.

But, we know your loathing for democracy. What the people want doesn't matter, as long as the Democrat wins.

Right?

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

The county election commission ordered the recount.

They might know a little more about what was going on than some angry internet retard leftist.

 

[Katzndogz]

Allen West

Worst Congressman in history.....one and done

Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress

22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".

Moron.

Yeah, he wound up paying a $5,000 fine for his crimes, and forced into retirement. Moron.

It should be a lesson for any commander that puts the lives of the men in his command above the comfort of a terrorist.

 

[daveman]

Why would they do a recount? It's not within the margin to trigger a recount.

Your butthurt is never-ending, it seems.

he HAS to. He started this FAILthread

daveman insists on a recount, even though they aren't in the margin to trigger a recount.

Then, since they didn't do a recount, daveman insists that they are cheating.

Then, once they start recounting and Murphy racks up an even larger lead, West concedes, but daveman still bitterly clings to Democrats cheating because they didn't do a recount.


Fucking hilarious!

Once again you prove you don't read what I write, but instead listen to the unreliable voices in your head.

 

[daveman]

Allen West

Worst Congressman in history.....one and done

Couldn't hack it in the Army, couldn't hack it in Congress

22 years in uniform =/= "couldn't hack it".

Moron.

Yeah, he wound up paying a $5,000 fine for his crimes, and forced into retirement. Moron.

Completely honorable. No court-martial.

But then, you're still pissed off that you didn't get what you wanted for Fitzmas, too.

 

[Dot Com]

So what is West's next move davemen?