Transgendered male sexually assaults female during wrestling match

Slight disagreement with the title: There is no such thing as a "transgendered male." No criticism intended. I thought there was such a thing, I will admit. Until I saw wokesters' reactions to being asked to prove or provide evidence that transgender is a real thing.
I didn’t know what to call him. He’s still basically a male.
 
The video is in the link.

You can make out hand in my crotch or something. Then the mom said "why did her face look like that?
 
I'm sure they will.

And I'm sure the school is covered because she and her parents signed a boatload of waivers before letting her compete for that Title IX money.
Somehow I doubt there’s a waiver for sexual assault on the mat.
 
I didn’t know what to call him. He’s still basically a male.
Sure, I get it. I've used the term many times.

The left is great for devising terms for things that are not real and then framing the debate so that we are forced to use their terms or else constantly correct their terminology. Doing that drags down debate, which is exactly what the left wants.

We could call him any number of things: delustional guy, cross-dresser, fraudulant participant in female sports, digital rapist in this specific case, and locker room peeper, brownie hound, bathroom voyeur, masher, etc. for dudes that invade female spaces.

But we say "transgender" so we all know what specific delusion/fraud we are talking about and so the wokesters cannot say "I don't know who you mean."

From now on, I'll put the word transgender in quotes as above to indicate that it is not real.
 
How can you see that? I don't see the hand nor the crotch.

Not saying it didn't happen, but where is the proof?
The arm is in her butt crack hand his not in view. But its definitely about where the girls cat is.

Prosecutors said not enough evidence to charge from that video.

You cant see the hand.
 
Sure, I get it. I've used the term many times.

The left is great for devising terms for things that are not real and then framing the debate so that we are forced to use their terms or else constantly correct their terminology. Doing that drags down debate, which is exactly what the left wants.

We could call him any number of things: delustional guy, cross-dresser, fraudulant participant in female sports, digital rapist in this specific case, and locker room peeper, brownie hound, bathroom voyear, masher, etc. for dudes that invade female spaces.

But we say "transgender" so we all know what specific delusion/fraud we are talking about and so the wokesters cannot say "I don't know who you mean."

From now on, I'll put the word transgender in quotes as above to indicate that it is not real.
"Reproductive rights".
"Gun violence."
"Attack on democracy."
"Assault rifle".
"Weapons of war."
"Gender affirming care."
They've got a million of them ... all completely fraudulent.
 
It would be very difficult to to prove sexual molestation whether male on female, male on male, or female on female, in a sport in which reaching through the opponents legs from the front and gripping the opponent's buttocks is a legitimate part of the sport. Which is why we men are at fault for not nipping this nonsense in the bud, so that girls are not having this done to them by boys.

This aspect of wrestling seems weird to me. But, when I was playing football in school, as back up quarterback, part of the game was putting the back of my hands against the center's crotch.

That type thing is yet another reason to have girls' sports rather than just make them one "all" gender sport.
 
How can you see that? I don't see the hand nor the crotch.

Not saying it didn't happen, but where is the proof?
Wasnt enough to charge. You cant see the hand or crotch.

But the girl said something like crotch as her mom laughed why did she have that look on her face.
 
Watch the Video and listen
I see no video. All I see are stills.
The arm is in her butt crack hand his not in view. But its definitely about where the girls cat is.

Prosecutors said not enough evidence to charge from that video.

You cant see the hand.
That is my ******* point! There is nothing to charge because no one can see anything. It's a "she said, "it" said nothing".
 
That is why no charges.

Now its in the Dept of Education whether violated rules on Trans
That's a completely different animal! That's where it should be and not in a court of law regarding whether or not the girl was assaulted. She should have never been wresting a tranny in the first place, so 95% of this thread is essentially off topic and a distraction from the real issue.
 
15th post
That's a completely different animal! That's where it should be and not in a court of law regarding whether or not the girl was assaulted. She should have never been wresting a tranny in the first place, so 95% of this thread is essentially off topic and a distraction from the real issue.
Took a bit of digging to find right articles.

Original artical was click bait. Showed NCAA match and NOT the STORY
 
This MALE, identifying as a female, was allowed to compete on the girls’ wrestling team, and so what does he do? He sexually assaults his female opponent, causing her great pain and causing her to scream out to her mother during the assault.

This is why anti woke LibsOfTikTok has so many followers...
 
Not just "grabbed". Digitally PENETRATED. That's rape.
Unless that guy has a middle finger that is a metal dildo.......can't see that happening
looks like plenty of padding to me

1781412891894.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom