Transgender child rapist denied hormones in prison

[PaintMyHouse]

If they want access to Jesus, or Shakespeare, that's also on our tab eh? That's how it works.

That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.

Sorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?

How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.

You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiate

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And to me that right there is how it should be. If the person didn't want to lose access to whatever it is that they are wanting now, they shouldn't have done what got them thrown in jail.

God bless you and their victim(s) always!!!

Holly

While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.

We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.

What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?

We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

 

[Conservative65]

That's how you want it to work. All that we owe them by holding them is food, clothing, and shelter not their wants.

Sorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?

How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.

You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiate

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Sorry, that's also not our system. How long before you start dealing with what is, never?

How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.

You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiate

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

 

[Conservative65]

While we may have to feed them, we don't have to cater to their wants especially those that have nothing to do with why they are in prison.

We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.

What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?

We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

What you're supporting with the transgender freak is doing things the same way it was done before IT was put in jail. Now, when someone else, albeit a hypothetical but a realistic one occurs, you don't want the person being able to do things the same way. Typical hypocritical lefty playing pick and choose.

 

[Conservative65]

How long before you stop catering to someone's wants. Never? We don't owe that freak a thing. IT'S choice to be a freak has nothing to do with ITS crime.

You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiate

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

That's a cop out from the typical cowardly piece of shit that is on the same level as the freak he supports. You deserve the same treatment that freak actually should get.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We cater to lots of their wants. Get over it. Kept in chains with a meal of bread and water is not our system. North Korea you'd like, try there.

What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?

We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

What you're supporting with the transgender freak is doing things the same way it was done before IT was put in jail. Now, when someone else, albeit a hypothetical but a realistic one occurs, you don't want the person being able to do things the same way. Typical hypocritical lefty playing pick and choose.

What I'm supporting are the rights of prisoners, regardless of their crime(s).

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You point is utterly invalid, so just drop. What his crime was matters not a damn, just what medical and mental health care is appropiate

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

That's a cop out from the typical cowardly piece of shit that is on the same level as the freak he supports. You deserve the same treatment that freak actually should get.

Get your emotions under control. And he should be getting treatment, a lot of it, he raped a toddler.

 

[Conservative65]

What if someone, prior to committing a crime, at lunch with his mother every Sunday and wants to do it after being put in prison. Do we meet that want, too?

We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

What you're supporting with the transgender freak is doing things the same way it was done before IT was put in jail. Now, when someone else, albeit a hypothetical but a realistic one occurs, you don't want the person being able to do things the same way. Typical hypocritical lefty playing pick and choose.

What I'm supporting are the rights of prisoners, regardless of their crime(s).

What you're supporting is the wants of prisoners. Whether or not this freak chose to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. A prisoner doesn't have the right to the taxpayers funding a choice that has nothing to do with why they are in prison.

 

[Conservative65]

Your point is that IT should get something that is a want not a need. That ITS wants have nothing to do with why IT is in jail means we don't owe IT what IT wants.

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

That's a cop out from the typical cowardly piece of shit that is on the same level as the freak he supports. You deserve the same treatment that freak actually should get.

Get your emotions under control. And he should be getting treatment, a lot of it, he raped a toddler.

IT should be strung up for what IT did so it can't do it again ever.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We could, if she came to the prison. Isn't Sunday family day?

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

What you're supporting with the transgender freak is doing things the same way it was done before IT was put in jail. Now, when someone else, albeit a hypothetical but a realistic one occurs, you don't want the person being able to do things the same way. Typical hypocritical lefty playing pick and choose.

What I'm supporting are the rights of prisoners, regardless of their crime(s).

What you're supporting is the wants of prisoners. Whether or not this freak chose to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. A prisoner doesn't have the right to the taxpayers funding a choice that has nothing to do with why they are in prison.

Your point has been DOA for pages now. He wants to go to college online, our bill. He wants to find Jesus, our bill. He wants the direction of Mecca so he can pray, on us. You are hooked on "want", which you're wrong about, but the system will work this out as it does all other lawsuits, in the courts and not the court of minions like you.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A want or a valid need is up to the professionals, and the courts, not the minions like you, to decide. That's how it works here.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

That's a cop out from the typical cowardly piece of shit that is on the same level as the freak he supports. You deserve the same treatment that freak actually should get.

Get your emotions under control. And he should be getting treatment, a lot of it, he raped a toddler.

IT should be strung up for what IT did so it can't do it again ever.

Again, get your emotions under control. That is not the country you live in, find another.

 

[RWNJ]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

 

[Conservative65]

That person always went where his/her mother was not the other way around. Do we let the prisoner continue going to where his/her mother is?

Nope. Those are the rules. But we don't say you can't see your mommy because you were a bad, bad boy now do we?

What you're supporting with the transgender freak is doing things the same way it was done before IT was put in jail. Now, when someone else, albeit a hypothetical but a realistic one occurs, you don't want the person being able to do things the same way. Typical hypocritical lefty playing pick and choose.

What I'm supporting are the rights of prisoners, regardless of their crime(s).

What you're supporting is the wants of prisoners. Whether or not this freak chose to be transgender has nothing to do with why IT is in prison. A prisoner doesn't have the right to the taxpayers funding a choice that has nothing to do with why they are in prison.

Your point has been DOA for pages now. He wants to go to college online, our bill. He wants to find Jesus, our bill. He wants the direction of Mecca so he can pray, on us. You are hooked on "want", which you're wrong about, but the system will work this out as it does all other lawsuits, in the courts and not the court of minions like you.

Not our bill. He doesn't have a right to college. None of those thing you mention are a right that the rest of us should pay for.

Typical unwillingness to answer a question like the coward you are.

That is the answer, you just dislike reality.

That's a cop out from the typical cowardly piece of shit that is on the same level as the freak he supports. You deserve the same treatment that freak actually should get.

Get your emotions under control. And he should be getting treatment, a lot of it, he raped a toddler.

IT should be strung up for what IT did so it can't do it again ever.

Again, get your emotions under control. That is not the country you live in, find another.

I've told you once son, when you can force me out, do so. Since you'd end up on the losing end, I doubt you will try.

 

[Conservative65]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

We, and I mean the system, is way too soft on criminals then wonder why there is such a high recidivism rate.

 

[RWNJ]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

We, and I mean the system, is way too soft on criminals then wonder why there is such a high recidivism rate.

The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. Most of them are black. If we could just get rid of them, Things would be a lot better. Forget the three strikes law, which isn't even enforced, to the best of my knowledge. If someone commits a violent crime, it should be a very stiff mandatory sentence. No plea bargains. If they do it again, life without parole. If a fatality is involved, it should be the death penalty. Does that sound too harsh? Well. Compare it to the high crime rate, loss of life and human suffering we have now. I'd make that trade in a heart beat.

 

[Conservative65]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

We, and I mean the system, is way too soft on criminals then wonder why there is such a high recidivism rate.

The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. Most of them are black. If we could just get rid of them, Things would be a lot better. Forget the three strikes law, which isn't even enforced, to the best of my knowledge. If someone commits a violent crime, it should be a very stiff mandatory sentence. No plea bargains. If they do it again, life without parole. If a fatality is involved, it should be the death penalty. Does that sound too harsh? Well. Compare it to the high crime rate, loss of life and human suffering we have now. I'd make that trade in a heart beat.

There are lots of countries that have harsh penalties for such crimes. The interesting thing is that the crime rate in those countries is very low. When the consequences of committing a crime aren't as bad as the benefits, anyone that thinks people will stop is just a simple minded dumbass.

 

[koshergrl]

His fellow inmates will calm him down just fine, freak.

Ah, more of your vigilante justice at work. Terrific...

ER...justice was done when he had his sick transgender ass thrown in prison. It's where all freaks belong. And the only special treatment pedophile trans need is the treatment they get in prison. It's poetic justice. They'll do to him a thousand times what he did to that poor kid, and that's fitting. If you are sorry for him I urge you to get homosexuality and transgender disorder listed as MENTAL ILLNESSES so that these loons can be locked up BEFORE they abuse children and BEFORE they get thrown in with some Very Bad Men.

Yes. You and Keys should put together a formal thought crimes thread so we can properly discuss your sick agenda to enact precrime laws.

I want all of USMB to see how twisted you two are, so by all means, indulge us.

Oh here we go with the "pedophiles who haven't actually DONE anything should just be left alone"....argument.

PEDOPHILIA IS A DANGEROUS MENTAL ILLNESS. The people who have it should be LOCKED THE **** UP where they can't hurt kids, and where kids' parents can't hurt them.

 

[koshergrl]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

We, and I mean the system, is way too soft on criminals then wonder why there is such a high recidivism rate.

The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. Most of them are black. If we could just get rid of them, Things would be a lot better. Forget the three strikes law, which isn't even enforced, to the best of my knowledge. If someone commits a violent crime, it should be a very stiff mandatory sentence. No plea bargains. If they do it again, life without parole. If a fatality is involved, it should be the death penalty. Does that sound too harsh? Well. Compare it to the high crime rate, loss of life and human suffering we have now. I'd make that trade in a heart beat.

There are lots of countries that have harsh penalties for such crimes. The interesting thing is that the crime rate in those countries is very low. When the consequences of committing a crime aren't as bad as the benefits, anyone that thinks people will stop is just a simple minded dumbass.

Child rape in some states in this country USED to be a capital offense. If you raped a kid and got convicted, you got the juice or the noose.

 

[Conservative65]

libsrals throw shitfit over their pedophile hero Transgendered child molestor sues jail for denying hormone therapy

He/she/it should just be glad they didn't get what they really deserve. A bullet in the head. We're way to soft on criminals. That's why we have such a problem with this type of crime. Think about it. If pedophiles KNEW that there was a mandatory death penalty for what they do, how many would even attempt it. And even if it didn't work as a deterrent, it has the benefit of getting rid of someone who will never harm another child.

We, and I mean the system, is way too soft on criminals then wonder why there is such a high recidivism rate.

The vast majority of violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders. Most of them are black. If we could just get rid of them, Things would be a lot better. Forget the three strikes law, which isn't even enforced, to the best of my knowledge. If someone commits a violent crime, it should be a very stiff mandatory sentence. No plea bargains. If they do it again, life without parole. If a fatality is involved, it should be the death penalty. Does that sound too harsh? Well. Compare it to the high crime rate, loss of life and human suffering we have now. I'd make that trade in a heart beat.

There are lots of countries that have harsh penalties for such crimes. The interesting thing is that the crime rate in those countries is very low. When the consequences of committing a crime aren't as bad as the benefits, anyone that thinks people will stop is just a simple minded dumbass.

Child rape in some states in this country USED to be a capital offense. If you raped a kid and got convicted, you got the juice or the noose.

In many areas, child molesters never made it to court. The local folks had a way of dealing with them and it worked.

My dad grew up in a small coal mining town in the north. When a husband abused his wife or his kids, the police weren't called. A group of men from the mine paid him a visit and "explained" to him that it wasn't the thing to do. If the explanation didn't get through, the next time it happened the "explanation" was more in-depth. If that didn't work, there likely wasn't an explanation if you catch my drift.