Transcripts Reveal Flynn Didn't Discuss Dropping Sanctions in Calls with Russian Ambassador

[Billiejeens]

The conversations consisted of standard diplomatic discussions, with a particular focus on the “strategic goal” shared by the two nations of achieving “stability in the Middle East.”

Kislyak also raised the possibility of inviting the Trump administration to a meeting in Astana, Kazakhstan, dedicated to advancing the Middle East peace process.


As it turns out, the topic of sanctions came up only once in Flynn’s Dec. 29, 2016, conversation with Kislyak. It was Kislyak who used the word “sanction,” not Flynn.

Advertisement - story continues below

The retired Army general never discussed removing the sanctions imposed by the Obama administration in the phone call.

So, another part of the narrative about the Trump campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia has collapsed.

Transcripts Reveal Flynn's Calls with Russian Ambassador Were Not About Dropping Sanctions

The topic of sanctions came up only once in Flynn's Dec. 29, 2016, conversation with Kislyak. It was Kislyak, not Flynn, who used the word 'sanction.'

www.westernjournal.com

 

[Billiejeens]

Of course the lesser intelligent people will fall back to this -


Citing a”senior U.S. government official,” Ignatius argued that “Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29,” as the Obama administration imposed sanctions on Russia in retaliation for allegedly hacking the Democratic National Committee’s e-mails.

In his column, Ignatius asked a series of questions implying that Flynn may have “undercut the U.S. sanctions” and violated the Logan Act, which “bars U.S. citizens from correspondence intending to influence a foreign government about ‘disputes’ with the United States.”


Which of course is simply talking points designed by a Democratic Media Operative to further an agenda

 

[Billy_Bob]

The entire lie comes crashing down.... Information they hoped no one would ever see...

 

[Maxdeath]

And then the same fools defend Kerry when he had no affiliation with any political party, only a private citizen going to talk with Iran.
It just shows how crazy they can be.

 

[Billiejeens]

And then the same fools defend Kerry when he had no affiliation with any political party, only a private citizen going to talk with Iran.
It just shows how crazy they can be.

They are dishonest, power hungry animals that have no public morals.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Of course the lesser intelligent people will fall back to this -


Citing a”senior U.S. government official,” Ignatius argued that “Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29,” as the Obama administration imposed sanctions on Russia in retaliation for allegedly hacking the Democratic National Committee’s e-mails.

In his column, Ignatius asked a series of questions implying that Flynn may have “undercut the U.S. sanctions” and violated the Logan Act, which “bars U.S. citizens from correspondence intending to influence a foreign government about ‘disputes’ with the United States.”


Which of course is simply talking points designed by a Democratic Media Operative to further an agenda

I posted those phone transcripts in another thread, asslips and other leftists completely ignored it, they maintain their delusion that he committed treason for making the calls, which he was NEVER charged for.

That is how fucked up these leftist democrats clowns have become.