JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,522
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty transparent, ain't it?I find it amusing the each side excuses their own actions if it furthers their agenda.
The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
And that is exactly the point. Had they gone out to the Refuge and forced the law to remove them by picking them up and putting them in a paddy wagon, they would have been protesters, spent a night in jail, and made their point. As is, we saw people in body armor theatening to shoot law officers if they tried to remove them. And creating bitter dissension in a small rural community.Not a good ending, I am all for protesting and taking the penalty for protesting. To use a gun to protest is wrong. Occupying the building was fine, to bring in weapons is asking for a showdown and someone is going to die.
Stupid ass, speak for yourself, don't even try to tell me what I think. Don't be putting words in other peoples mouths.Other examples of treason might include Bill Ayers and Dan Rather. A couple of decades ago Bill Ayers was terrorizing the Country with IED's detonated at Military recruitment centers and corporate headquarters and even the Pentagon. According to testimony of a gang member, the last bomb his little terrorist cell made was intended for U. S. Soldiers at a Ft. Dix dance. The bomb blew up prematurely and killed four members of his gang which made Ayers guilty of four felony murders. He was exonerated by a friendly federal judge who blamed the FBI for Ayers' unpleasantness. Today he is viewed as a left wing Robin Hood and is a "respected" college professor and a former adviser to the democrat party including the president. Dan Rather's treason didn't include violence but it was intended to derail the electoral process with forged documents. Today Rather makes about 100k per speech to low information democrats.
The Weather Underground got in a gun battle with the cops and robbed an armored car. But, the Liberals don't see anything wrong with that.
And that is exactly the point. Had they gone out to the Refuge and forced the law to remove them by picking them up and putting them in a paddy wagon, they would have been protesters, spent a night in jail, and made their point. As is, we saw people in body armor theatening to shoot law officers if they tried to remove them. And creating bitter dissension in a small rural community.Not a good ending, I am all for protesting and taking the penalty for protesting. To use a gun to protest is wrong. Occupying the building was fine, to bring in weapons is asking for a showdown and someone is going to die.
Stupid ass, speak for yourself, don't even try to tell me what I think. Don't be putting words in other peoples mouths.Other examples of treason might include Bill Ayers and Dan Rather. A couple of decades ago Bill Ayers was terrorizing the Country with IED's detonated at Military recruitment centers and corporate headquarters and even the Pentagon. According to testimony of a gang member, the last bomb his little terrorist cell made was intended for U. S. Soldiers at a Ft. Dix dance. The bomb blew up prematurely and killed four members of his gang which made Ayers guilty of four felony murders. He was exonerated by a friendly federal judge who blamed the FBI for Ayers' unpleasantness. Today he is viewed as a left wing Robin Hood and is a "respected" college professor and a former adviser to the democrat party including the president. Dan Rather's treason didn't include violence but it was intended to derail the electoral process with forged documents. Today Rather makes about 100k per speech to low information democrats.
The Weather Underground got in a gun battle with the cops and robbed an armored car. But, the Liberals don't see anything wrong with that.
See, your denial knowingly of what just asserted makes you troll trash. You are wrong and that is obvious to all.The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
Good thing I was wasn't using it, then.
It's the only way certain troll trash on either side of the discussion makes points, so they think.Stupid ass, speak for yourself, don't even try to tell me what I think. Don't be putting words in other peoples mouths.Other examples of treason might include Bill Ayers and Dan Rather. A couple of decades ago Bill Ayers was terrorizing the Country with IED's detonated at Military recruitment centers and corporate headquarters and even the Pentagon. According to testimony of a gang member, the last bomb his little terrorist cell made was intended for U. S. Soldiers at a Ft. Dix dance. The bomb blew up prematurely and killed four members of his gang which made Ayers guilty of four felony murders. He was exonerated by a friendly federal judge who blamed the FBI for Ayers' unpleasantness. Today he is viewed as a left wing Robin Hood and is a "respected" college professor and a former adviser to the democrat party including the president. Dan Rather's treason didn't include violence but it was intended to derail the electoral process with forged documents. Today Rather makes about 100k per speech to low information democrats.
The Weather Underground got in a gun battle with the cops and robbed an armored car. But, the Liberals don't see anything wrong with that.
See, your denial knowingly of what just asserted makes you troll trash. You are wrong and that is obvious to all.The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
Good thing I was wasn't using it, then.
Your own words convict you, and you don't like that. Tough, because you are going to eat your words. Both Oregon and Baltimore were wrong, were criminal.See, your denial knowingly of what just asserted makes you troll trash. You are wrong and that is obvious to all.The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
Good thing I was wasn't using it, then.
Ah, more insults. The first sign that a Liberal realized his argument is worthless.
Dumb fuck, this is about the people that occupied a Federal Installation in Oregon by force of arms. That you have to constantly change the subject is evidence that you have nothing valid to say about the situation.And that is exactly the point. Had they gone out to the Refuge and forced the law to remove them by picking them up and putting them in a paddy wagon, they would have been protesters, spent a night in jail, and made their point. As is, we saw people in body armor theatening to shoot law officers if they tried to remove them. And creating bitter dissension in a small rural community.Not a good ending, I am all for protesting and taking the penalty for protesting. To use a gun to protest is wrong. Occupying the building was fine, to bring in weapons is asking for a showdown and someone is going to die.
But, burning, looting, assaulting, murdering and screaming, "no justice, no peace", is ok.
Dumb fuck, this is about the people that occupied a Federal Installation in Oregon by force of arms. That you have to constantly change the subject is evidence that you have nothing valid to say about the situation.And that is exactly the point. Had they gone out to the Refuge and forced the law to remove them by picking them up and putting them in a paddy wagon, they would have been protesters, spent a night in jail, and made their point. As is, we saw people in body armor theatening to shoot law officers if they tried to remove them. And creating bitter dissension in a small rural community.Not a good ending, I am all for protesting and taking the penalty for protesting. To use a gun to protest is wrong. Occupying the building was fine, to bring in weapons is asking for a showdown and someone is going to die.
But, burning, looting, assaulting, murdering and screaming, "no justice, no peace", is ok.
Your own words convict you, and you don't like that. Tough, because you are going to eat your words. Both Oregon and Baltimore were wrong, were criminal.See, your denial knowingly of what just asserted makes you troll trash. You are wrong and that is obvious to all.The tu quoque fallacy does not work for either of you, Ace and Wild
Good thing I was wasn't using it, then.
Ah, more insults. The first sign that a Liberal realized his argument is worthless.
When did I make excuses for what happened in Baltimore and Ferguson?They didn't harm anyone's property? Then who paved a road through the refuge, took fences down and removed security cameras?Rioting and burning private property, while declaring, "no justice, no peace", is sedition as well.
The difference between the Oregon dustup and the black lives matter riots, is the protesters in Oregon didn't harm anyone, or anyone's property.
Who burned down buildings, assaulted and murdered innocent citizens in Baltimore and Ferguson?
You got WildBill's argument on the ground and are stomping it. Keep it up.When did I make excuses for what happened in Baltimore and Ferguson?They didn't harm anyone's property? Then who paved a road through the refuge, took fences down and removed security cameras?Rioting and burning private property, while declaring, "no justice, no peace", is sedition as well.
The difference between the Oregon dustup and the black lives matter riots, is the protesters in Oregon didn't harm anyone, or anyone's property.
Who burned down buildings, assaulted and murdered innocent citizens in Baltimore and Ferguson?
When did I make excuses for what happened in Baltimore and Ferguson?They didn't harm anyone's property? Then who paved a road through the refuge, took fences down and removed security cameras?Rioting and burning private property, while declaring, "no justice, no peace", is sedition as well.
The difference between the Oregon dustup and the black lives matter riots, is the protesters in Oregon didn't harm anyone, or anyone's property.
Who burned down buildings, assaulted and murdered innocent citizens in Baltimore and Ferguson?