Traitor and Benghazi ghoul Susan Rice's lies continue

"Susan Rice was a key cog in both the Clinton and Obama administrations’ disinformation machines designed to keep the truth from the American people and hide what was arguably criminal negligence in the deaths of many Americans at the hands of terrorism. That she should be up to her eyeballs in this current round of corruption by Team Obama, using classified data gleaned by surveillance of Americans to sabotage an incoming president, is both unconscionable and not surprising."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIflDETr
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
If those trump staff people had not been communicating with the Russians their names would never have come up for investigations and as suspects possibly involved in espionage and treason.

Let's not talk about the Treason committed by members of the Trump Administration, let's arrest those who outed these people and their crimes. Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election is puppyshit compared with outing these traitors.

These people are American citizens and they have their rights, one of which is they can openly conspire with Russian agents, and if members of the CIA or the FBI are listening, tough noogies. They can't be touched. But anyone who tells the truth about what they did can be sent to jail.

What's wrong with this notion?
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

Yup, she did her job. Her job was to lie/distract/protect Obamy.
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.
Susan Rice is a liar.
 
Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election


You have not one shred of evidence to even start a discussion of that. There is an allegation that Russia was behind the HACKS that produced the TRUTH about Hillary that you wanted COVERED UP. That TRUTH included

1. CNN giving the debate questions to Hillary before the debate, a CONVICTION of deliberate conspiracy to undermine the election
2. paid Hillary staffers started fights at Trump events so the pro-Hillary media would report that Trump was "inciting violence."
3. "US" media outlets like CNN and NYT routinely sent "news" stories to Hillary's campaign for "proofing," proving that the Dems and the "US" media are really one and the same


The Obama CIA has the ability to hack with that "Russian footprint," the only "evidence" you have of any Russian involvement at all.

Truth is that O has tried to frame Trump, and it ain't working...
 
"Susan Rice was a key cog in both the Clinton and Obama administrations’ disinformation machines designed to keep the truth from the American people and hide what was arguably criminal negligence in the deaths of many Americans at the hands of terrorism. That she should be up to her eyeballs in this current round of corruption by Team Obama, using classified data gleaned by surveillance of Americans to sabotage an incoming president, is both unconscionable and not surprising."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIflDETr
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
If those trump staff people had not been communicating with the Russians their names would never have come up for investigations and as suspects possibly involved in espionage and treason.

Let's not talk about the Treason committed by members of the Trump Administration, let's arrest those who outed these people and their crimes. Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election is puppyshit compared with outing these traitors.

These people are American citizens and they have their rights, one of which is they can openly conspire with Russian agents, and if members of the CIA or the FBI are listening, tough noogies. They can't be touched. But anyone who tells the truth about what they did can be sent to jail.

What's wrong with this notion?
What is wrong with the notion you present is that American citizens have the right to conspire with Russian agents. That, depending on the circumstances can be construed as espionage or even treason, the penalty of which can be death, execution. I would suggest you research this topic before you enter into any agreements to conspire with Russian agents.
 
Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election


You have not one shred of evidence to even start a discussion of that. There is an allegation that Russia was behind the HACKS that produced the TRUTH about Hillary that you wanted COVERED UP. That TRUTH included

1. CNN giving the debate questions to Hillary before the debate, a CONVICTION of deliberate conspiracy to undermine the election
2. paid Hillary staffers started fights at Trump events so the pro-Hillary media would report that Trump was "inciting violence."
3. "US" media outlets like CNN and NYT routinely sent "news" stories to Hillary's campaign for "proofing," proving that the Dems and the "US" media are really one and the same


The Obama CIA has the ability to hack with that "Russian footprint," the only "evidence" you have of any Russian involvement at all.

Truth is that O has tried to frame Trump, and it ain't working...

1. CNN also fired Donna Brazillle for doing that.

2. This one is a Trump fabrication based on a carefully edited interview with a guy who has never worker for the DNC or the Clinton campaign. I'm using as a source a conservative Canadian newspaper and it's investigation of the so-called "evidence", which really is more alt-right conspiracy theory lies, and made up bullshit.

Trump says Clinton incited fights at rallies, and it’s ‘all on tape.’ Here’s what the tape says

3. Media outlets always send stories to their subjects for comment and response before printing. Read their disclaimers. If Trump didn't like the story, he refused to comment, and then he tweets lies about the outlet he does like.
 
Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election


You have not one shred of evidence to even start a discussion of that. There is an allegation that Russia was behind the HACKS that produced the TRUTH about Hillary that you wanted COVERED UP. That TRUTH included

1. CNN giving the debate questions to Hillary before the debate, a CONVICTION of deliberate conspiracy to undermine the election
2. paid Hillary staffers started fights at Trump events so the pro-Hillary media would report that Trump was "inciting violence."
3. "US" media outlets like CNN and NYT routinely sent "news" stories to Hillary's campaign for "proofing," proving that the Dems and the "US" media are really one and the same


The Obama CIA has the ability to hack with that "Russian footprint," the only "evidence" you have of any Russian involvement at all.

Truth is that O has tried to frame Trump, and it ain't working...
There was a fake news campaign conducted by Russia, much of it seen right here at USMB, to portray Clinton as a key component and conspirator to put a Nazi regime at the head of the Ukraine government. Clinton, the alleged supporter of NAZI's, was a Russian operation that fit the exact description of US intelligence agencies in regards to Russian attempts to influence and interfere in the election with fake news. Clinton the Nazi!!!
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?

And the lies from clinton and O are endless.
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?

And the lies from clinton and O are endless.
Ya, OK, but the committees did not find all those lies you imagine in your head. Perhaps the voices you hear in your head are lying to you.
 
Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?

And the lies from clinton and O are endless.
Ya, OK, but the committees did not find all those lies you imagine in your head. Perhaps the voices you hear in your head are lying to you.

No voices here bubba. Their time is coming
 
She lied about Benghazi and she's lying now. That's her primary function.

"While Trump’s pick for this sensitive post was under scrutiny, Obama’s adviser was doing opposition research which involved data mining classified intelligence reports. Rice requested the unmasking of names, something only three people, according to Circa, were authorized to do:

"Dozens of times in 2016, those intelligence reports identified Americans who were directly intercepted talking to foreign sources or were the subject of conversations between two or more monitored foreign figures. Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

"If Susan Rice had worked for Richard Nixon, she could have been one of his Watergate “plumbers”, perhaps retiring as plumber emeritus. We are all familiar with Susan Rice’s tour of the Sunday talk shows after the Benghazi terrorist attack. That was no accident, but a calculated part of the Obama administration’s disinformation campaign to protect President Obama’s reelection chances and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chances to be Obama’s successor in the White House. As Investor’s Business Daily editorialized:

"Newly obtained emails on Benghazi show then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was coached by a key White House aide to lie and ignore the facts known and reported on the ground to make the administration look good.

"The fish rots from the head, as the saying goes, and no further proof is needed than a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, contained in more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch and obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request.

"That email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET," was sent to other key White House staffers such as then-Communications Director David Plouffe and Press Secretary Jay Carney the day before now-National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her whirlwind tour on five Sunday news show appearances to specifically and emphatically blame an Internet video for the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other nationals were killed.

"One of the goals listed in the emails was the need for Rice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy." She was also to "reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges." Her job was not to tell the truth, but to put lipstick on the Obama administration's Benghazi pig."



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIeXI6bl

Dr. Rice never lied about Benghazi. Why do you NaziCons keep lying about it?

NYT: Captured Suspect Said Benghazi Attack Was Revenge For Anti-Islam Video
 
She lied about Benghazi and she's lying now. That's her primary function.

"While Trump’s pick for this sensitive post was under scrutiny, Obama’s adviser was doing opposition research which involved data mining classified intelligence reports. Rice requested the unmasking of names, something only three people, according to Circa, were authorized to do:

"Dozens of times in 2016, those intelligence reports identified Americans who were directly intercepted talking to foreign sources or were the subject of conversations between two or more monitored foreign figures. Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

"If Susan Rice had worked for Richard Nixon, she could have been one of his Watergate “plumbers”, perhaps retiring as plumber emeritus. We are all familiar with Susan Rice’s tour of the Sunday talk shows after the Benghazi terrorist attack. That was no accident, but a calculated part of the Obama administration’s disinformation campaign to protect President Obama’s reelection chances and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chances to be Obama’s successor in the White House. As Investor’s Business Daily editorialized:

"Newly obtained emails on Benghazi show then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was coached by a key White House aide to lie and ignore the facts known and reported on the ground to make the administration look good.

"The fish rots from the head, as the saying goes, and no further proof is needed than a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, contained in more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch and obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request.

"That email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET," was sent to other key White House staffers such as then-Communications Director David Plouffe and Press Secretary Jay Carney the day before now-National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her whirlwind tour on five Sunday news show appearances to specifically and emphatically blame an Internet video for the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other nationals were killed.

"One of the goals listed in the emails was the need for Rice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy." She was also to "reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges." Her job was not to tell the truth, but to put lipstick on the Obama administration's Benghazi pig."



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIeXI6bl

Dr. Rice never lied about Benghazi. Why do you NaziCons keep lying about it?

NYT: Captured Suspect Said Benghazi Attack Was Revenge For Anti-Islam Video

Good gawd you can't possibly be trying to keep that BS narrative going? Oh wait....it's you
 
She lied about Benghazi and she's lying now. That's her primary function.

"While Trump’s pick for this sensitive post was under scrutiny, Obama’s adviser was doing opposition research which involved data mining classified intelligence reports. Rice requested the unmasking of names, something only three people, according to Circa, were authorized to do:

"Dozens of times in 2016, those intelligence reports identified Americans who were directly intercepted talking to foreign sources or were the subject of conversations between two or more monitored foreign figures. Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

"If Susan Rice had worked for Richard Nixon, she could have been one of his Watergate “plumbers”, perhaps retiring as plumber emeritus. We are all familiar with Susan Rice’s tour of the Sunday talk shows after the Benghazi terrorist attack. That was no accident, but a calculated part of the Obama administration’s disinformation campaign to protect President Obama’s reelection chances and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chances to be Obama’s successor in the White House. As Investor’s Business Daily editorialized:

"Newly obtained emails on Benghazi show then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice was coached by a key White House aide to lie and ignore the facts known and reported on the ground to make the administration look good.

"The fish rots from the head, as the saying goes, and no further proof is needed than a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, contained in more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch and obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request.

"That email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 p.m. ET," was sent to other key White House staffers such as then-Communications Director David Plouffe and Press Secretary Jay Carney the day before now-National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her whirlwind tour on five Sunday news show appearances to specifically and emphatically blame an Internet video for the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, in which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other nationals were killed.

"One of the goals listed in the emails was the need for Rice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy." She was also to "reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges." Her job was not to tell the truth, but to put lipstick on the Obama administration's Benghazi pig."



Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIeXI6bl

Dr. Rice never lied about Benghazi. Why do you NaziCons keep lying about it?

NYT: Captured Suspect Said Benghazi Attack Was Revenge For Anti-Islam Video

Good gawd you can't possibly be trying to keep that BS narrative going? Oh wait....it's you

Sassy, Lakota is an alt-left myrmidon. "It" doesn't even rate a response.

Susan Rice is a compulsive liar. She's so good at it the believes the shit she vomits. I also think that Valerie Jarret and she are Obama's secondary main squeezes.
 
Rice has not lied about anything. She is on TV answering questions today and has stated she will testify before congress if asked. The Benghazi stuff is just old rw nut job stuff.

Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?

And the lies from clinton and O are endless.

Bullshit. The lies about Clinton on the right, and especially the fake news sites, were endless.

1. Clinton had Parkinsons, dementia, brain damage - total bullshit.

2. Clinton was being bribed by foreign governments - investigated by Congress, the IRS, and the FBI, founding nothing of the kind.

3. Hillary lied about Benghazi - Not according to 7 Republican lead investigations.

4. Hillary lies and lies. This is a persistent Republican myth. Republicans started characterizing the former First Lady as a liar since the 1990's. Every right wing pundit since that time has echoed it, and now it's a known fact. Except that it was and is and always has been a lie.

Additional lies not supported by the fact: The Clintons "stole" $200,000 worth of furniture and other stuff from the White House.

Republicans were hard pressed to counter the popular Presidency of Bill Clinton, so they attacked the Clinton's relentlessly and have been vilifying them since before Bill's election. This is how Republicans counter competency - with lies and personal attacks. Show the utter dearth of ideas coming out of the Republican Party these days.
 
Many of us know too well how lefties like to parse their words, so, I agree with you rice has not lied. Susan Rice, on the other hand, has lied way too many times. Testify before congress....sure, guessing she'll promise to tell them the truth.
No parsed words. Susan Rice has not lied about this nonsense. She was doing her job, more than could be said about that other Rice, the National Security Advisor for Bush who ignored warnings about an al-Qaeda attack coming. Condi Rice was the Rice that told the outrageous lies.

If she were doing her job, she would have been collecting intel on clinton and benghazi but she looked the other way then.
How many congressional committee investigations proclaim you to be hopelessly delusional? Was it 16 separate investigations? More?

And the lies from clinton and O are endless.

Bullshit. The lies about Clinton on the right, and especially the fake news sites, were endless.

1. Clinton had Parkinsons, dementia, brain damage - total bullshit.

2. Clinton was being bribed by foreign governments - investigated by Congress, the IRS, and the FBI, founding nothing of the kind.

3. Hillary lied about Benghazi - Not according to 7 Republican lead investigations.

4. Hillary lies and lies. This is a persistent Republican myth. Republicans started characterizing the former First Lady as a liar since the 1990's. Every right wing pundit since that time has echoed it, and now it's a known fact. Except that it was and is and always has been a lie.

Additional lies not supported by the fact: The Clintons "stole" $200,000 worth of furniture and other stuff from the White House.

Republicans were hard pressed to counter the popular Presidency of Bill Clinton, so they attacked the Clinton's relentlessly and have been vilifying them since before Bill's election. This is how Republicans counter competency - with lies and personal attacks. Show the utter dearth of ideas coming out of the Republican Party these days.

All those hearings about Benghazi with Gowdy getting a little woody every time he walked into the hearing, he could be heard talking to his little woody, yep today is the day we get her. Whoops just another few million of wasteless money going after her.

Did we not have a war on terror? Benghazi had known terrorist's, so I look at Beghazi as an act of war. True the aftermath could have been handled better, but no one was guilty of one damn thing. Remember who had control of congress, yep the repugs and could not find one thing to prosecute her on.
 
"Susan Rice was a key cog in both the Clinton and Obama administrations’ disinformation machines designed to keep the truth from the American people and hide what was arguably criminal negligence in the deaths of many Americans at the hands of terrorism. That she should be up to her eyeballs in this current round of corruption by Team Obama, using classified data gleaned by surveillance of Americans to sabotage an incoming president, is both unconscionable and not surprising."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/04/benghazi_liar_susan_rices_treachery_continues.html#ixzz4dIflDETr
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
If those trump staff people had not been communicating with the Russians their names would never have come up for investigations and as suspects possibly involved in espionage and treason.

Let's not talk about the Treason committed by members of the Trump Administration, let's arrest those who outed these people and their crimes. Conspiring with the Russian government to steal the election is puppyshit compared with outing these traitors.

These people are American citizens and they have their rights, one of which is they can openly conspire with Russian agents, and if members of the CIA or the FBI are listening, tough noogies. They can't be touched. But anyone who tells the truth about what they did can be sent to jail.

What's wrong with this notion?
What is wrong with the notion you present is that American citizens have the right to conspire with Russian agents. That, depending on the circumstances can be construed as espionage or even treason, the penalty of which can be death, execution. I would suggest you research this topic before you enter into any agreements to conspire with Russian agents.

That's what Trump supporters are saying. This surveillance involved US citizens and as such, revealing or outing the contents of this surveillance is illegal, and the Americans who are conspiring with Russian agents are not charged. Only the people who reveal this happened should be charged.
 

Forum List

Back
Top