Trading The Second Amendment For Nuclear Subs

[Flanders]

At some point a quisling president will sign the UN Small Arms Treaty:

Obama can sign UN arms treaty on Monday, but advocates worry he’ll stall
By Julian Pecquet - 06/02/13 02:45 PM ET

Obama can sign UN arms treaty on Monday, but advocates worry he?ll stall - The Hill's Global Affairs

Signing the treaty gives the United Nations credibility as well as a grip on future Americans. Ratification is the next step.

NOTE: There is a realistic fear that Hussein’s signature will be enough to enforce the Small Arms Treaty. Whenever Democrats are stopped they find a way to go around the roadblock —— and the Constitution be damned. IRS abuses provide a good example of how it’s done; so there is no telling what they have in mind with an UNRATIFIED United Nations treaty.

Hussein, Hilary Clinton, and every top Democrat would like nothing better than to see the Small Arms Treaty ratified. Ratification won’t happen in the near future, but in five, or ten, or twenty, or thirty years, it could be ratified. UN treaties never die, and traitors will never give up so long as they are shielded by US membership in the United Nations —— more so when one generation of traitors trains the next generation with tax dollars and influential jobs.

Look back at the New START Treaty to understand how Democrat traitors work:

Russia plans to resume nuclear submarine patrols in the southern seas after a hiatus of more than 20 years following the break-up of the Soviet Union, Itar-Tass news agency reported on Saturday, in another example of efforts to revive Moscow's military.

The plan to send Borei-class submarines, designed to carry 16 long-range nuclear missiles, to the southern hemisphere follows President Vladimir Putin's decision in March to deploy a naval unit in the Mediterranean Sea on a permanent basis starting this year.

XXXXX​

. . . the Cold War-era foes signed a landmark treaty in 2010 setting lower limits on the size of their long-range nuclear arsenals.

But the limited numbers of warheads and delivery vehicles such as submarines that they committed to under the New START treaty are still enough to devastate the world. Putin has made clear Russia will continue to upgrade its arsenal.

Hussein & Company ratified The New START Treaty with Russia. America got nothing from New START. To be precise I should say that New START gave America Russian nuclear subs armed with nuclear missiles. That’s a poor trade for disarming Americans.

In any event, I don’t see the point of disarming law-abiding gun owners. How in hell will millions of hand guns and rifles in the hands of Americans prevent Russia from getting reckless? Of course, it is entirely possible Hussein & Company think all of those small arms fired simultaneously will shoot down incoming Russian missiles.

Finally, is anybody in our military wondering if Hussein gave Putin free rein to place nuclear submarines in an attack position in the southern hemisphere.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE&feature=player_detailpage]Obama open mic slip: 'After my election I have more flexibility' - YouTube[/ame]​

I can only pray that our military leaders don’t buy this:

"The revival of nuclear submarine patrols will allow us to fulfill the tasks of strategic deterrence not only across the North Pole but also the South Pole," . . .

Russia to send nuclear submarines to southern seas
By Alexei Anishchuk
MOSCOW | Sat Jun 1, 2013 9:40am EDT

Russia to send nuclear submarines to southern seas | Reuters

 

[Flanders]

Yesterday, Hussein did not sign the UN Small Arms Treaty. No matter. Conventional wisdom suggests he will sign it in the Month of Least Flak:

And yet, it sounds like the White House might suddenly be feeling sheepish about the issue all over again. They’re once more pulling out the stall tactics, waiting to sign a bill that President Obama fundamentally supports but most of the Senate fundamentally opposes until both Congress and much of the country are on vacation in August (a.k.a. the time when Congress and the media will raise the least amount of collective fuss over the whole thing) — except that the president could have signed it today if he had really wanted to.

Or maybe June 3 is too close to the Fourth of July. Had he signed it yesterday he would look like the lying sack of shit he is when he does his phony love of country gig next month —— after he formally agreed to give the United Nations another chunk of America’s independence.

To no one’s surprise, the traitor with the most seniority is all aglow at the prospect of taking part in another successful betrayal:

Still, Secretary of State John Kerry is pretty darn excited about the prospect of the United States hopping on board with the United Nations’ treaty:

Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that the Obama administration would sign a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, despite bipartisan resistance in Congress from members concerned it could lead to new gun control measures in the U.S.

Kerry, releasing a written statement as the U.N. treaty opened for signature Monday, said the U.S. “welcomes” the next phase for the treaty, which the U.N. General Assembly approved on April 2.

“We look forward to signing it . . .​

John Kerry pretty pumped about signing off on UN arms trade treaty; White House oddly fine with waiting it out
posted at 8:01 pm on June 3, 2013 by Erika Johnsen

John Kerry pretty pumped about signing off on UN arms trade treaty; White House oddly fine with waiting it out « Hot Air