TowerGate - Timeline and Connecting Dots...follow the money!

[oreo]

Here is an updated timeline of events from public sources outlining what is now TowerGate:


June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.

2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.

3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.

4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.

• 
  
  
  • Admiral Michael Rogers had a visit with President Trump on Friday, November 11th.
  • According to the Executive Order rule changes DNI James Clapper signed off on December 15th.
  • General Michael Flynn spoke to the Russian Ambassador on December 29th
  • Dec 29th 2016 – Obama announces sanctions on Russia

6. January: Obama expands NSA sharing. As Michael Walsh later notes, and as the New York Times reports, the outgoing Obama administration “expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” The new powers, and reduced protections, could make it easier for intelligence on private citizens to be circulated improperly or leaked.

The new rules, which were issued in an unclassified document, entitled Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency (NSA), significantly relaxed longstanding limits on what the NSA may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations.

These operations are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. Surveillances include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls, and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

The changes initiated by the Obama Administration in its waning days empowered far more agents and officials to search through raw intelligence data.

• 
  
  
  • Jan 3rd 2017 – Loretta Lynch signs off on rule changes for phone taps.
  • Jan 12th 2017 – WaPo reports On Phone Calls Anonymous Intel Sources
  • Jan 15th 2017 – VP Pence appears on Face the nation.
  • Jan 20th 2017 – Inauguration
  • Jan 23rd 2017 – FBI reports nothing unlawful in content of Flynn call
  • Jan 26th 2017 – Sally Yates (acting DOJ) informs President Trump there might be a conflict between VP Pence’s stated TV version (was told by Flynn), and what Intel community communicate to Yates that Flynn actually expressed to Russia.
  • Jan 27th 2017 – White House counsel begins investigation to discrepancy.

7. January: Times report. The New York Times reports, on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies — the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties.

Other news outlets also report the existence of a multi-agency working group to coordinate investigations across the government,” though it is unclear how they found out, since the investigations would have been secret and involved classified information.

8. February: Mike Flynn scandal. Reports emerge that the FBI intercepted a conversation in 2016 between future National Security Adviser Michael Flynn — then a private citizen — and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The intercept supposedly was part of routine spying on the ambassador, not monitoring of the Trump campaign. The FBI transcripts reportedly show the two discussing Obama’s newly-imposed sanctions on Russia, though Flynn earlier denied discussing them.

Sally Yates, whom Trump would later fire as acting Attorney General for insubordination, is involved in the investigation. In the end, Flynn resigns over having misled Vice President Mike Pence (perhaps inadvertently) about the content of the conversation.

9. February: Times claims extensive Russian contacts. The New York Times cites “four current and former American officials” in reporting that the Trump campaign had “repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials. The Trump campaign denies the claims — and the Times admits that there is “no evidence” of coordination between the campaign and the Russians. The White House and some congressional Republicans begin to raise questions about illegal intelligence leaks.

10. March: the Washington Post targets Jeff Sessions. The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office.

The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts.

The New York Times, in covering the story, adds that the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign. By “preserve” it really means “disseminate”: officials spread evidence throughout other government agencies “to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators” and perhaps the media as well....

TowerGate Begins – Yes, If Trump is Correct, Even Partially, Then President Obama Might Be in Big Trouble…

Yes Obama did preserve intelligence. Here is what is going on:

What the Reich wing seems to forget is that Obama ordered this Russian investigation to be done BEFORE he left office. I imagine it was. He's not going to turn his investigation over to FBI Director James Comey, who is also under investigation for his interference into this election, much less put it into Republican hands who would have squashed it.
DOJ to Investigate James Comey and the FBI

The Senate investigation is a 2nd investigation, just for show. We'll watch it happen, then we'll see more leaks regarding the Republican investigation.

So Obama sits and waits patiently, waits for one of them to lie under oath, and out pops another leak showing they were lying. He's cast a very wide net, and it's going to ensnarl all of them before he's done. Eventually he'll leak everything, but I imagine he won't do that until Democrats take over in 2018.

Obama has clearly OUTFOXED Trump and company.

 

[boedicca]

Oh blah blah blah so sleepy ZZZZZZZZZZZ

You're all for the entire country grinding to a half over the Russian lies. Those have been under investigation for nearly a year, with NOTHING to show for it.

A couple of top trump aides have been fired and a half dozen has been shown to have had meetings. Plus the AG has been forced to disqualify himself from investigations.

Politics, bub.

These are the result of the Obama Resistance movement - the first time ever in our history that a former President has deliberately undermined his successor. Trump is onto him now - hence the recent outing of Obama's spying efforts.

Nothing has been outed except for the orange ones dopey delusional conspiracy theory mindset.

So wrong. The utter corruption of the Dems has been revealed in all its unseemly horror.

Even his strongest supporters are beginning to admit his lies "sometimes", but they always have excuses for it being OK for him to lie sometimes because someone else lied about stuff in the past. Obama or Clinton lied in the past so it is OK for trump to lie too.

Obabble lied non-stop...and continues to do so.

Trump is the victim here, bub. Obabble is WORSE THAN NIXON.

 

[boedicca]

The Obabble Admin has a long history of spying on their adversaries (and even their friends):


Today, 23 February 2016 at 00:00 GMT [updated 12:20 GMT], WikiLeaks publishes highly classified documents showing that the US National Security Agency bugged a private climate change strategy meeting; between UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin; singled out the Chief of Staff of UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for long term interception targetting his Swiss phone; singled out the Director of the Rules Division of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), Johann Human, and targetted his Swiss phone for long term interception; stole sensitive Italian diplomatic cables detailing how Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu implored Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to help patch up his relationship with US President Barack Obama, who was refusing to talk to Netanyahu; intercepted top EU and Japanese trade ministers discussing their secret strategy and red lines to stop the US "extort[ing]" them at the WTO Doha arounds (the talks subsequently collapsed); explicitly targetted five other top EU economic officials for long term interception, including their French, Austrian and Belgium phone numbers; explicitly targetted the phones of Italy's ambassador to NATO and other top Italian officials for long term interception; and intercepted details of a critical private meeting between then French president Nicolas Sarkozy, Merkel and Berluscon, where the latter was told the Italian banking system was ready to "pop like a cork".

Some of the intercepts are classified TOP-SECRET COMINT-GAMMA and are the most highly classified documents ever published by a media organization.

WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange said "Today we proved the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon's private meetings over how to save the planet from climate change were bugged by a country intent on protecting its largest oil companies. Back in 2010 we revealed that the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had ordered her diplomats to steal the UN leadership's biometric data and other information. The US government has signed agreements with the UN that it will not engage in such conduct. It will be interesting to see the UN's reaction, because if the United Nations Secretary General, whose communications and person have legal inviolability, can be repeatedly attacked without consequence then everyone is at risk."

The NSA data for this release: UN Sec Gen & Merkel intercept, UNHCR & WTO target selectors and assignments, Netanyahu-Berlusconi-Sarkozy-Merkel intercepts, EU-Japan WTO/Doha trade talks strategy intercept, EU & Belgium MFA target selectors and assignments and Italy target selectors and assignments.

WikiLeaks - NSA Targets World Leaders for US Geopolitical Interests

 

[jc456]

October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons,

How can wiretaps continue if they weren't happening? The FISA court approved it and you say they did it for no reason? Lol...that's not how any of this works.

It is if it's illegal

Ifs don't count. Reality does.

so do laws, and it's looking like a law or two have been broken. we'll see eh?

 

[jc456]

Oh blah blah blah so sleepy ZZZZZZZZZZZ

You're all for the entire country grinding to a half over the Russian lies. Those have been under investigation for nearly a year, with NOTHING to show for it.

A couple of top trump aides have been fired and a half dozen has been shown to have had meetings. Plus the AG has been forced to disqualify himself from investigations.

Politics, bub.

These are the result of the Obama Resistance movement - the first time ever in our history that a former President has deliberately undermined his successor. Trump is onto him now - hence the recent outing of Obama's spying efforts.

Nothing has been outed except for the orange ones dopey delusional conspiracy theory mindset.

So wrong. The utter corruption of the Dems has been revealed in all its unseemly horror.

Even his strongest supporters are beginning to admit his lies "sometimes", but they always have excuses for it being OK for him to lie sometimes because someone else lied about stuff in the past. Obama or Clinton lied in the past so it is OK for trump to lie too.

who?

 

[oreo]

Trump most definitely should not do that. He is doing what he should do - deferring to the Congressional Investigation.

So your claim is that Congress should investigate every lie Trump tells, regardless of whether there's no evidence for it.

Such a good party hack you are. Does it bother you at all that you're using Stalinist tactics, or does doing that make you proud?

Stalin is a Russian if you remember correctly, and it's Trump that has been using his tactics. It's very clear that Trump surrogates were in frequent contact not only with the Russian ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, (via Trump's son-in-law). They or should I say Obama has the phone records and possibly the recorded conversations to prove it. Collusion with a foreign adversary to interfere into an American election will be considered TREASON. We consider cyber attacks to be a 21st century--act of WAR.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump's banning of certain media outlets from attending white house daily briefings, his attacking the intelligence of the intelligence agencies, his continual denial of their intelligence, his threatening of those that are leaking (which is Obama) his checking white house staff cell phones to insure they're not talking to the media, is EXACTLY what Stalin would have done. He's gone paranoid, and it's going to get much worse for him and his administration.

I imagine this will end up in impeachment, and it will a 1000 times worse than Watergate, because it does in fact involve a Foreign Adversary, and not just a break-in of one single DNC office.

One YUUUUGE mistake America!

 

[boedicca]

Trump most definitely should not do that. He is doing what he should do - deferring to the Congressional Investigation.

So your claim is that Congress should investigate every lie Trump tells, regardless of whether there's no evidence for it.

Such a good party hack you are. Does it bother you at all that you're using Stalinist tactics, or does doing that make you proud?

Stalin is a Russian if you remember correctly, and it's Trump that has been using his tactics. It's very clear that Trump surrogates were in frequent contact not only with the Russian ambassador but also with Russian intelligence agents, (via Trump's son-in-law). They or should I say Obama has the phone records and possibly the recorded conversations to prove it. Collusion with a foreign adversary to interfere into an American election will be considered TREASON. We consider cyber attacks to be a 21st century--act of WAR.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia


Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump's banning of certain media outlets from attending white house daily briefings, his attacking the intelligence of the intelligence agencies, his continual denial of their intelligence, his threatening of those that are leaking (which is Obama) his checking white house staff cell phones to insure they're not talking to the media, is EXACTLY what Stalin would have done. He's gone paranoid, and it's going to get much worse for him and his administration.

I imagine this will end up in impeachment, and it will a 1000 times worse than Watergate, because it does in fact involve a Foreign Adversary, and not just a break-in of one single DNC office.

One YUUUUGE mistake America!

Only in in the Anti-Matter Universe.

 

[boedicca]

This is VERY INTERESTING.

1. Obabble's admin gets the FISA court to approve the 2nd request in October 2016.
2. hiLIARy sends out this tweet and info in October 2016

 

[oreo]

This is VERY INTERESTING.

1. Obabble's admin gets the FISA court to approve the 2nd request in October 2016.
2. hiLIARy send out this tweet and info in October 2016

View attachment 115728

View attachment 115727

I don't believe anything that comes out of Trump's tweety fingers. Trump says Hillary knew this and she knew that--it doesn't matter what she knew and what she didn't know.

Who gives a rats ass. The point is Donald Trump has turned out to be the biggest scandal in American history. Less than 2 months into office, he's a fucking walking, talking,tweeting, disaster. Now live with it dumbass.

 

[boedicca]

This is VERY INTERESTING.

1. Obabble's admin gets the FISA court to approve the 2nd request in October 2016.
2. hiLIARy send out this tweet and info in October 2016

View attachment 115728

View attachment 115727

I don't believe anything that comes out of Trump's tweety fingers. Trump says Hillary knew this and she knew that--it doesn't matter what she knew and what she didn't know.

Who gives a rats ass. The point is Donald Trump has turned out to be the biggest scandal in American history. Less than 2 months into office, he's a fucking walking, talking,tweeting, disaster. Now live with it dumbass.

You're sense of perspective is glaringly inadequate.

Obama weaponized the Executive Branch against his political enemies (including regular citizens who dared to support the tea party). That IS THE SCANDAL HERE.

 

[Marion Morrison]

boedicca Can I like, follow you to get access to a link somebody posted yesterday to a statute?

I know it was yesterday, and posted several times, yet cannot find

 

[Snouter]

...Lindsey Graham..

oreo, please stop posting ridiculous content by neocon nutcases and homosexual qu33rs Lindsey Graham and Shep Smith. Thanks in advance!

 

[boedicca]

boedicca Can I like, follow you to get access to a link somebody posted yesterday to a statute?

I know it was yesterday, and posted several times, yet cannot find

Marion Morrison Oh certainly. If you're looking for the FISA one:

FISA, 50 USC 1801, et seq., is a very limited method of obtaining surveillance authority. The reason for its strict limits is that FISA evades the regular federal court process, by not allowing regularly, Constitutionally appointed federal judges and their magistrates to authorize surveillance the Fourth Amendment would otherwise forbid. Instead, the Chief Justice handpicks the FISA court members, who have shown an exceptional deference to the executive branch. This is because FISA court members trust the government is only bringing them surveillance about pending terror attacks or “grave hostile” war-like attacks, as the FISA statute limits itself to. Thus, a FISA application can only be used in very limited circumstances.

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance

 

[Billy_Bob]

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.

And yet the facts call you (along with Clapper and Comey) out as a liar.

Fact: The phone call to Flynn, where someone committed multiple felony's by revealing a private citizens phone conversation, was while he was physically IN TRUMP TOWER.

Fact: Someone has either a FISA warrant or they are tapping phones illegally and distributing it. given the next fact it was most certainly a government tap.

Fact: Three different leaks from three different agencies with access to the federal wire tapping program have been identified.. Obama made it distributed far and wide with just 12 days remaining in his term.

Notably, the ignorant cant connect the dots.

Now based on the FACTS we can surmise:
1(There is a warrant allowing wire tapping.
2(In violation of the law a conversation by a private citizen was published.
3(In violation of the law a conversation was illegally removed from the government program.

There are at least 9 violations of Federal law and felonies.. I wonder who authorized the tap and what did they use for probable cause?

 

[francoHFW]

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.

And yet the facts call you (along with Clapper and Comey) out as a liar.

Fact: The phone call to Flynn, where someone committed multiple felony's by revealing a private citizens phone conversation, was while he was physically IN TRUMP TOWER.

Fact: Someone has either a FISA warrant or they are tapping phones illegally and distributing it. given the next fact it was most certainly a government tap.

Fact: Three different leaks from three different agencies with access to the federal wire tapping program have been identified.. Obama made it distributed far and wide with just 12 days remaining in his term.

Notably, the ignorant cant connect the dots.

Now based on the FACTS we can surmise:
1(There is a warrant allowing wire tapping.
2(In violation of the law a conversation by a private citizen was published.
3(In violation of the law a conversation was illegally removed from the government program.

There are at least 9 violations of Federal law and felonies.. I wonder who authorized the tap and what did they use for probable cause?

What a coincidence that he was talking to a Russian diplomat, who are often tapped, dupe. Baffled by BS as usual...

 

[boedicca]

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.

And yet the facts call you (along with Clapper and Comey) out as a liar.

Fact: The phone call to Flynn, where someone committed multiple felony's by revealing a private citizens phone conversation, was while he was physically IN TRUMP TOWER.

Fact: Someone has either a FISA warrant or they are tapping phones illegally and distributing it. given the next fact it was most certainly a government tap.

Fact: Three different leaks from three different agencies with access to the federal wire tapping program have been identified.. Obama made it distributed far and wide with just 12 days remaining in his term.

Notably, the ignorant cant connect the dots.

Now based on the FACTS we can surmise:
1(There is a warrant allowing wire tapping.
2(In violation of the law a conversation by a private citizen was published.
3(In violation of the law a conversation was illegally removed from the government program.

There are at least 9 violations of Federal law and felonies.. I wonder who authorized the tap and what did they use for probable cause?

What a coincidence that he was talking to a Russian diplomat, who are often tapped, dupe. Baffled by BS as usual...

Here's what FrancoDupe^1,000,000 is unable to grok:

Under a FISA order, any communcations involving a private U.S. citizen are supposed to be kept private. Leaking/sharing this information is a CRIME.

 

[francoHFW]

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.

And yet the facts call you (along with Clapper and Comey) out as a liar.

Fact: The phone call to Flynn, where someone committed multiple felony's by revealing a private citizens phone conversation, was while he was physically IN TRUMP TOWER.

Fact: Someone has either a FISA warrant or they are tapping phones illegally and distributing it. given the next fact it was most certainly a government tap.

Fact: Three different leaks from three different agencies with access to the federal wire tapping program have been identified.. Obama made it distributed far and wide with just 12 days remaining in his term.

Notably, the ignorant cant connect the dots.

Now based on the FACTS we can surmise:
1(There is a warrant allowing wire tapping.
2(In violation of the law a conversation by a private citizen was published.
3(In violation of the law a conversation was illegally removed from the government program.

There are at least 9 violations of Federal law and felonies.. I wonder who authorized the tap and what did they use for probable cause?

What a coincidence that he was talking to a Russian diplomat, who are often tapped, dupe. Baffled by BS as usual...

Here's what FrancoDupe^1,000,000 is unable to grok:

Under a FISA order, any communcations involving a private U.S. citizen are supposed to be kept private. Leaking/sharing this information is a CRIME.

Private citizens aren't supposed to discuss sanctions and policy with Russian diplomats either. Maybe Trump shouldn't call intelligence officers Nazis and all the other RIDICULOUS crap he does. Your party and president and you silly dupes are all a disgrace.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump | Zero Hedge
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03.../james-clapper-denies-obama-wiretapped-trump
9 hours ago - James Clapper: "There was no such wire tap activity amounted against" Donald Trump. ... President Barack Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower in the last stages of the 2016 presidential campaign, .... Title is very misleading and Ryan says no such thing. ... Comey said the FBI approved the FISA wiretap.
Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump's Wiretapping Claim
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-seeks...tapped.../ar-AAnOQko
3 hours ago - The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to ... the tapping of the phones of Mr. Trump and his aides at Trump Tower in New York. ... “There was no suchwiretap activity mounted against the ... it told him all about the wire taps and that his cup of coffee confirmed it.

And yet the facts call you (along with Clapper and Comey) out as a liar.

Fact: The phone call to Flynn, where someone committed multiple felony's by revealing a private citizens phone conversation, was while he was physically IN TRUMP TOWER.

Fact: Someone has either a FISA warrant or they are tapping phones illegally and distributing it. given the next fact it was most certainly a government tap.

Fact: Three different leaks from three different agencies with access to the federal wire tapping program have been identified.. Obama made it distributed far and wide with just 12 days remaining in his term.

Notably, the ignorant cant connect the dots.

Now based on the FACTS we can surmise:
1(There is a warrant allowing wire tapping.
2(In violation of the law a conversation by a private citizen was published.
3(In violation of the law a conversation was illegally removed from the government program.

There are at least 9 violations of Federal law and felonies.. I wonder who authorized the tap and what did they use for probable cause?

What a coincidence that he was talking to a Russian diplomat, who are often tapped, dupe. Baffled by BS as usual...

Here's what FrancoDupe^1,000,000 is unable to grok:

Under a FISA order, any communcations involving a private U.S. citizen are supposed to be kept private. Leaking/sharing this information is a CRIME.

Private citizens aren't supposed to discuss sanctions and policy with Russian diplomats either. Maybe Trump shouldn't call intelligence officers Nazis and all the other RIDICULOUS crap he does. Your party and president and you silly dupes are all a disgrace.

 

[Snouter]

Folks, we know President TRUMP has pwnd Butthurt Obama and Crooked Hillary. But it is only going to get worse for the democrat scumbags. This is not contained to democrat White haters. Notice Bush is embraced by the qu33r MSM and even Hannity lately. Bush. The neocon douchebag who let 9/11 happen.

 

[The Original Tree]

Or abused by Barak Obama To Attack his Enemies just like he did with
The IRS.

And yes asshole can order a wire tap and bypass even FISA, and did order it. How else did he record Flynn's every word?

Obama Bin Lying is an immoral piece of shit that should be prosecuted for Treason!

Where the Phuck is this coward?

Why is he in hiding?

Is Clapper Lying?

boedicca Can I like, follow you to get access to a link somebody posted yesterday to a statute?

I know it was yesterday, and posted several times, yet cannot find

Marion Morrison Oh certainly. If you're looking for the FISA one:

FISA, 50 USC 1801, et seq., is a very limited method of obtaining surveillance authority. The reason for its strict limits is that FISA evades the regular federal court process, by not allowing regularly, Constitutionally appointed federal judges and their magistrates to authorize surveillance the Fourth Amendment would otherwise forbid. Instead, the Chief Justice handpicks the FISA court members, who have shown an exceptional deference to the executive branch. This is because FISA court members trust the government is only bringing them surveillance about pending terror attacks or “grave hostile” war-like attacks, as the FISA statute limits itself to. Thus, a FISA application can only be used in very limited circumstances.

Yes, There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance