2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,334
- 52,582
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #61
“Pro-crime policies”??This list, put together by left wing CBS....top 10 deadliest cities in U.S......all run by democrats for decades with their pro-criminal, anti-police policies......
Murder map: Deadliest U.S. cities
1--St. Louis, Missouri...democrats since 1949
2. Baltimore, Maryland...except for one republican in 1963, democrats since 1947
3. New Orleans, Louisiana...Democrats since 1872
4.Detroit, Michigan...democrats since 1962
5. Cleveland, Ohio...2 republicans...1972, 1980, democrats since 1942
6. Las Vegas, Nevada...Democrats since 1975
7.Kansas City, Missouri...Republicans, 1978, 1924....democrats since 1918
8.Memphis...hard to get list of party affiliation, but democrat since 1982
9. Newark, New Jersey...democrat since 1953
10. Chicago, Illinois...democrat since 1931
11. Cincinati, Ohio...democrat controlled city council since 1951
12. Philadephia, Pennsylvania...democrats since 1952
13. Miwaukee, Wisconsin....democrat or socialist since 1916 except for on non-partisan in 1942
See the problem?
And on and on .........it isn't guns in the hands of law abiding gun owners....it is pro-crime policies by the democrat party...
You can’t be that stupid.
Yes.....when they grant bail to violent repeat gun offenders....when they reduce the time to be served for violent crimes....as they do in democrat cities and states, they are pro-crime policies.....the criminals who actually shoot other people have long histories of crime and violence and have been released over and over again even with felony gun convictions on their records...
For example...
California Democrats hate the gun, not the gunman – Orange County Register
Now that Democrats have supermajorities in the California state Legislature, they’ve rolled into Sacramento with a zest for lowering the state’s prison population and have interpreted St. Augustine’s words of wisdom to mean, “Hate the gun, not the gunman.”
I say this because, once they finally took a break from preaching about the benefits of stricter gun control, the state Senate voted to loosen sentencing guidelines for criminals convicted of gun crimes.
Currently, California law requires anyone who uses a gun while committing a felony to have their sentence increased by 10 years or more in prison — on top of the normal criminal penalty. If enacted, Senate Bill 620 would eliminate that mandate.
The bill, which passed on a 22-14 party-line vote, with support only from Democrats, now heads to the state Assembly for consideration.
Republicans and the National Rifle Association have vowed to campaign against it.
Why have Democrats suddenly developed a soft spot for criminals convicted of gun crimes? The bill’s author, state Sen. Steve Bradford, D-Gardena, says that he was motivated to write the bill after a 17-year-old riding in a car involved in a drive-by shooting was sentenced to 25 years in prison, even though he claims that he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger.
and for all those anti-gunners who want to know where criminals get guns....well...this law lowers the prison time for those who give guns to criminals.....
Why is that?
Prop. 57, for example, very deceptively and fundamentally changed the definition of what constitutes a “non-violent” offense.
supplying a firearm to a gang member,
l
felon obtaining a firearm,
discharging a firearm on school grounds
When you say "repeat", do you mean a whole bunch at one time?
So...dipstick....in 2018 there were 12 mass public shootings, not all of them by white males, with 93 killed...
Then you have the rest of the gun murder number...the 10,889.....and the majority of those killers are Black, democrat and shooting people in democrat controlled areas of our cities....
You really are pretty stupid...