- Sep 9, 2022
- 12,674
- 5,687
- 938
So your issue is statements made in court? Are you saying you forgot that Schumer threatened the Supreme Court justices?I can’t remember when he was on trial, what was the case?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So your issue is statements made in court? Are you saying you forgot that Schumer threatened the Supreme Court justices?I can’t remember when he was on trial, what was the case?
This is all about the Bragg case which has failed to produce a crime... What is the crime?... I've been asking this all week and no one can tell me what the damn crime is...Oh, you are switching gears on me, I thought we were talking about his words. The laws he he is alleged to have broken are public record and have been all over the news for some time now. You don’t need me to tell you.
When Trump has dinner. Does he threaten the cooks? The title of that mob is protesters. This is lawful. What was illegal is cops hurling grenades at them to move them into the Capitol. Cops are professionals. They know about crowd control. A cop murdered Ashli Babbitt who was legally inside the hall. You can watch video of some cops walking past her at the door. They did not attempt to arrest any of the people then. Lt. Byrd should be in prison.What words inspired a mob to attack the Capitol? Or Pelosi?
He just comes out and says it, no shame at all.
This can't be kosher, can it?
It's obviously happening at trump's direction, so isn't this a violation?
For everyone but the defendant I guess.Excellent!
Free speech.
Never have I seen you attack any Democrat. You claim you do but when the hell will that happen? Was Trump a great man as a Democrat?True, TRUMP was once a (D), now he pretends to fight for the (R).
But thanks for admitting that TRUMP is .............
Would you like me to literally pick out and post the exact quotes for you or are you capable of reading these articles and drawing your own conclusions?What words inspired a mob to attack the Capitol? Or Pelosi?
Are you actually that Trump is incapable of defending himself, with out talking about his side case without having to attack the judge and his family? Seriously? Because if that is the case, he sounds like he has no defense.
lol, that doesn’t matter…. Are you suggesting that Schumer threatening a scotus judge is somehow more moral simply because there wasn’t a case against him?I can’t remember when he was on trial, what was the case?
Democrats can’t win in a fair fight.People on the outside are using this case to damage him in the court of public opinion…shouldn’t he be allowed to do the same to them?
Peacefully and patriotically…those words provoke ire in the heart of every democrat!!What words inspired a mob to attack the Capitol? Or Pelosi?
I got alerted by what Obama did in 2017 to Trump. Suddenly out of the blue comes an article alleging Trump was working for the Russians. And this article is why the Democrats took action against Trump also claiming he worked for the Russians. And the press was a megaphone. All they talked about was how Trump was a traitor. When Trump was cleared, they went after the AG as now he was the enemy.The legal profession is horrified over what corrupt scheming lowlife scum Democrats are doing. I for one expected it, Democrats are the lowest form of filth it's their nature.
Obama STOLE General Motors from the lawful owners, the bond holders. STOLE it via threats of retaliation from the Federal government if bond holders did not capitulate. Then gifted 1/3 of it to the auto unions.I got alerted by what Obama did in 2017 to Trump. Suddenly out of the blue comes an article alleging Trump was working for the Russians. And this article is why the Democrats took action against Trump also claiming he worked for the Russians. And the press was a megaphone. All they talked about was how Trump was a traitor. When Trump was cleared, they went after the AG as now he was the enemy.
Gag orders do not apply to statements not involving a court case or has that changed?So your issue is statements made in court? Are you saying you forgot that Schumer threatened the Supreme Court justices?
First of all, prior to the cops attacking them, they were very mild natured. After cops hurled grenades back of the protestors, did they move to the Capitol and were frightened by the cops. Inside the cops treated them well until the criminal cop killed Ashli Babbitt who at that point had tried to stop damage to the doors in the hall.Would you like me to literally pick out and post the exact quotes for you or are you capable of reading these articles and drawing your own conclusions?
Surveying Evidence of How Trump's Actions Activated Jan. 6 Rioters
A triangulation of evidence that extremists treated then-President Trump's words as instructions for the events on Jan. 6.www.justsecurity.org
Trump and the language of insurrection | BrandeisNOW
Before a crowd of thousands marched to the Capitol and violently breached the building, they listened to a speech from President Donald Trump outside the White House for more than an hour.www.brandeis.edu
“I Am the Law and Order Candidate” A Content Analysis of Donald Trump’s Race-Baiting Dog Whistles in the 2016 Presidential Campaign
Empirical analysis reveals consistent dog whistle usage in Donald Trump's speeches during the 2016 US Presidential campaign, surpassing previous Republican nominees. Explore the alignment between message, messenger, and receiver in this content analysis.www.scirp.org
They aren’t usually one sided.Gag orders do not apply to statements not involving a court case or has that changed?
Obama should have been in prison over things like that which he did as you say.Obama STOLE General Motors from the lawful owners, the bond holders. STOLE it via threats of retaliation from the Federal government if bond holders did not capitulate. Then gifted 1/3 of it to the auto unions.
Are you saying you forgot that Schumer threatened the Supreme Court justices?Gag orders do not apply to statements not involving a court case or has that changed?
I am suggesting that the conversation is about a gag order. Are you trying to derail it? Shall we talk about bees, the recent flooding in Texas, stock prices …. or just more what about isms that have nothing do with a gag order in a case currently under trial?lol, that doesn’t matter…. Are you suggesting that Schumer threatening a scotus judge is somehow more moral simply because there wasn’t a case against him?