Tom Hanks Thinks He Couldn't Play A Gay Man Now Because He's Not Gay

[martybegan]

I don’t need to bring myself to say that because I don’t think we need to label a default for our species. That would be like saying the default race of humans is Asian.

We are a world of unique individuals and each individual has their own “default”. Stupid term BTW.

Nothing scientific about your claim.

race isn't a default anything, the only argument you could have is the African race is probably the progenitor of all the others, with said others being natural deviation of the original homo sapiens stock.

We are all homo sapiens. Is the default sexuality of the species homo sapiens, an organism that reproduces sexually, heterosexuality. Yes or No.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Then there was Busom Buddies

That was before Philadelphia though and they were crossdressers...man, hanks has had one illustrious career.

 

[Slade3200]

race isn't a default anything, the only argument you could have is the African race is probably the progenitor of all the others, with said others being natural deviation of the original homo sapiens stock.

We are all homo sapiens. Is the default sexuality of the species homo sapiens, an organism that reproduces sexually, heterosexuality. Yes or No.

The whole concept of a default sexuality is something that you're making up. You see absurdity in the race example I gave... good, it highlights the absurdity of your argument. The majority of humans are straight and will reproduce. Some aren't and some won't. Those that don't aren't broken or damaged its just who they are. What is so hard to accept about that?

 

[martybegan]

The whole concept of a default sexuality is something that you're making up. You see absurdity in the race example I gave... good, it highlights the absurdity of your argument. The majority of humans are straight and will reproduce. Some aren't and some won't. Those that don't aren't broken or damaged its just who they are. What is so hard to accept about that?

The concept of heterosexuality for a species that reproduces by sexual means is reality, not made up, not a moral judgement, not absurd. It's plain and simple reality.

My nearsightedness makes me "broken" in some way, why doesn't the lack of attraction to the opposite sex qualify as the same? Is it detrimental to the ability of the person to procreate or not?

 

[Slade3200]

The concept of heterosexuality for a species that reproduces by sexual means is reality, not made up, not a moral judgement, not absurd. It's plain and simple reality.

My nearsightedness makes me "broken" in some way, why doesn't the lack of attraction to the opposite sex qualify as the same? Is it detrimental to the ability of the person to procreate or not?

I never said sexuality was made up. Don’t put words in my mouth. I said your “default” label was made up.

Perhaps it’s not the purpose of every humans life to procreate. So why would somebody who chooses not to be broken?

Also there are plenty of gay and lesbian couples that procreate so you’re spinning down a dead end path.

My cousin is gay and she gave birth to and raised a child

 

[martybegan]

I never said sexuality was made up. Don’t put words in my mouth. I said your “default” label was made up.

Perhaps it’s not the purpose of every humans life to procreate. So why would somebody who chooses not to be broken?

Also there are plenty of gay and lesbian couples that procreate so you’re spinning down a dead end path.

My cousin is gay and she gave birth to and raised a child

I left out the default, and my default concept is not made up, it's reality. Is it default for a person to be born with two arms, yes or no? Is autism default or not autism default?

It's the biological purpose of every organism to procreate.

They procreate despite their lack of desire to have sex with the opposite sex, which without current societal situations and technology would be a huge disadvantage. Plus they still need someone of the opposite sex involved.

 

[Polishprince]

I never said sexuality was made up. Don’t put words in my mouth. I said your “default” label was made up.

Perhaps it’s not the purpose of every humans life to procreate. So why would somebody who chooses not to be broken?

Also there are plenty of gay and lesbian couples that procreate so you’re spinning down a dead end path.

My cousin is gay and she gave birth to and raised a child

Hey slade. If you want it in your caboose, go for it for all I care.

But the idea of expecting Normative people to glorify you for it, that isn't going to happen.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Being Woke is making Hollywood go down the road of insanity.

Tom Hanks says he couldn’t play gay role today like he did in ‘Philadelphia’

“Let’s address ‘Could a straight man do what I did in Philadelphia now?’” Hanks asked. “No, and rightly so.”

nypost.com

You have to stay in your lane.
You have to be Hispanic to play a Hispanic.
You have to be Gay to play a homosexual.
You cannot be something that you are not.

Excuse me....I thought that was what acting meant. I thought it meant being something you are not. Playing a part used to be what acting was. Your ability to change your character. Now you're not allowed to be Latin unless you're actually Latin. Tom Hanks claims he can't play the part that won him an Oscar because he's not gay.

But it is okay to have a black actor playing Ann Boleyn??
That is how it is in the insanity of WOKE

 

[iamwhatiseem]

ALSO - this means gay actors can only play gay characters.

 

[Slade3200]

I left out the default, and my default concept is not made up, it's reality. Is it default for a person to be born with two arms, yes or no? Is autism default or not autism default?

It's the biological purpose of every organism to procreate.

They procreate despite their lack of desire to have sex with the opposite sex, which without current societal situations and technology would be a huge disadvantage. Plus they still need someone of the opposite sex involved.

I don't know how many times I need need to repeat this until you get it... There is no "Default" we are all individuals and are unique. Somebody who is gay is born that way, it is there default, somebody with Autism... That is their default.

It is not the biological purpose of every organism to procreate. That is something that you just made up. Procreation is inherent in most of our nature sure, but not everybody and not every organism. There is purpose outside of procreation for some and many.

 

[Slade3200]

Hey slade. If you want it in your caboose, go for it for all I care.

But the idea of expecting Normative people to glorify you for it, that isn't going to happen.

First off I'm not a caboose guy. Second, I never said anything about glorifying it... It gets glorified as a reaction to demonization. Thats what the wings do. I'm all for normalization. It should not make a difference if one is straight or gay... Would love to live in a world were people weren't judge because of that. We have a loooooong way to go though.

 

[Slade3200]

ALSO - this means gay actors can only play gay characters.

No, that's not at all what it means. You're not the sharpest pencil in the pouch are ya?

 

[martybegan]

I don't know how many times I need need to repeat this until you get it... There is no "Default" we are all individuals and are unique. Somebody who is gay is born that way, it is there default, somebody with Autism... That is their default.

It is not the biological purpose of every organism to procreate. That is something that you just made up. Procreation is inherent in most of our nature sure, but not everybody and not every organism. There is purpose outside of procreation for some and many.

We are a species, species have defaults. Head, two hands, eyes, language capability, heterosexuality.

Any biological organism that doesn't have a default desire to procreate dies out.

All you are doing is confusing morality with biology.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Only the mentally-challenged can play the mentally-challenged.

hanks is mentally challenged

 

[Circe]

But it is okay to have a black actor playing Ann Boleyn??
That is how it is in the insanity of WOKE

Sure. They've been experimenting with all that a lot. The latest Persuasion by Jane Austen "staging" is infested with blacks playing romantic, upper-class roles in -------- Regency England of 1815?????? Much distress is being heard from the fan public. I myself (I guess I'm one too) am horrified.

I suppose it's an outgrowth of the idea that nobody should be different from anyone else: you can't say black because that means they aren't white, can't say someone is male even if they are because maybe they can be female -------- all that.

So sure, let Gwyneth Paltrow play Fidel Castro. That's ---- WOKE. Or better yet, have some black play Alexander Hamilton.

God, I hope I live long enough to see an end to these travesties. Of course I never look at them voluntarily!! But one stumbles into them unawares! I was really shocked by the Persuasion, got out of it as fast as I realized what they'd done, but it's too bad. There's a big market and desire for good performances of those books. It spoils so much.

 

[Circe]

No, that's not at all what it means. You're not the sharpest pencil in the pouch are ya?

Yes, that's exactly what it means. Scarlet Johansson backed out of a part playing a trannie, because of the Twitter mob that took out after her when the casting became known. I don't think they are doing the movie now: the Twitterverse insisted a trannie had to play it. And of course there aren't any sane trannies, much less any with so much talent and star power.

 

[marvin martian]

Being Woke is making Hollywood go down the road of insanity.

Tom Hanks says he couldn’t play gay role today like he did in ‘Philadelphia’

“Let’s address ‘Could a straight man do what I did in Philadelphia now?’” Hanks asked. “No, and rightly so.”

nypost.com

You have to stay in your lane.
You have to be Hispanic to play a Hispanic.
You have to be Gay to play a homosexual.
You cannot be something that you are not.

Excuse me....I thought that was what acting meant. I thought it meant being something you are not. Playing a part used to be what acting was. Your ability to change your character. Now you're not allowed to be Latin unless you're actually Latin. Tom Hanks claims he can't play the part that won him an Oscar because he's not gay.

He wasn't that great anyway.

 

[BS Filter]

Does that mean you have to be a retard to play Forest Gump?

Biden could play Forest Gump, except for the running parts.

 

[mudwhistle]

Sure. They've been experimenting with all that a lot. The latest Emma by Jane Austen "staging" is infested with blacks playing romantic, upper-class roles in -------- Regency England of 1815?????? Much distress is being heard from the fan public. I myself (I guess I'm one too) am horrified.

I suppose it's an outgrowth of the idea that nobody should be different from anyone else: you can't say black because that means they aren't white, can't say someone is male even if they are because maybe they can be female -------- all that.

So sure, let Gwyneth Paltrow play Fidel Castro. That's ---- WOKE. Or better yet, have some black play Alexander Hamilton.

God, I hope I live long enough to see an end to these travesties. Of course I never look at them voluntarily!! But one stumbles into them unawares! I was really shocked by the Emma, got out of it as fast as I realized what they'd done, but it's too bad. There's a big market and desire for good performances of those books. It spoils so much.

 

[Slade3200]

Yes, that's exactly what it means. Scarlet Johansson backed out of a part playing a trannie, because of the Twitter mob that took out after her when the casting became known. I don't think they are doing the movie now: the Twitterverse insisted a trannie had to play it. And of course there aren't any sane trannies, much less any with so much talent and star power.

There are less and less pencil sharpeners in this world... Its a shame.