Jarlaxle
Gold Member
You first, psychobitch!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You first, psychobitch!
Me either.
Use prisoners or drug addicts they'll take anything.
You are speaking with no more humanity then those who are issuing death threats to a seriously ill woman.
You are assuming that I have humanity or want it. Use prisoners for experiments. We have a full death row. All good candidates. There is no reason why innocent animals should be harmed. Drug addicts kill themselves every day taking drugs. They have no problem with drugs that kill. More good candidates.
I am sorry she is ill, but she supports cruelty to animals. I cannot condone that.
scientific experiments are not cruelty. It is how science advances.
as long as there are no other possibilities for the experiments and testing - they will continue, which fells under the expression of necessary evil.
Dya eat meat Katz'? If ya do, not really in a morally superior position to object ya know. Wear make-up? Take analgesics for a headache? Ever had surgery or a dental procedure? All made possible by animal testing.
I never said that animal testing was unnecessary. Just that there might be another way, like using undesirables such as criminals and drug addicts. Gather them up out of the gutters where they die slow deaths from worthless lives.
If you offered prisoners some perk, they'd volunteer. Especially the lifers and those on death row.
I am sorry she is ill, but she supports cruelty to animals. I cannot condone that.
scientific experiments are not cruelty. It is how science advances.
as long as there are no other possibilities for the experiments and testing - they will continue, which fells under the expression of necessary evil.
Then the Nazi experiments were okay in your eyes?
You are speaking with no more humanity then those who are issuing death threats to a seriously ill woman.
You are assuming that I have humanity or want it. Use prisoners for experiments. We have a full death row. All good candidates. There is no reason why innocent animals should be harmed. Drug addicts kill themselves every day taking drugs. They have no problem with drugs that kill. More good candidates.
Wow! You're so dark and gloomy ... can we use you as human poison tester? You probably would not be afraid, right? I mean - being so deliciously subversive and all ... .
Sigh ... I'll never find a real man like that.
/plays with hair and looks to the heavens.
Liberal faggots are so tolerant
I think this kind of threat is unacceptable.
That said, how many drugs has the FDA had to pull off the market that were just fine in animal tests?
50 disasters of animal testing » Vivisection Information Network - Animal Testing and Science - The Facts
You are speaking with no more humanity then those who are issuing death threats to a seriously ill woman.
You are assuming that I have humanity or want it. Use prisoners for experiments. We have a full death row. All good candidates. There is no reason why innocent animals should be harmed. Drug addicts kill themselves every day taking drugs. They have no problem with drugs that kill. More good candidates.
Wow! You're so dark and gloomy ... can we use you as human poison tester? You probably would not be afraid, right? I mean - being so deliciously subversive and all ... .
Sigh ... I'll never find a real man like that.
/plays with hair and looks to the heavens.
You are assuming that I have humanity or want it. Use prisoners for experiments. We have a full death row. All good candidates. There is no reason why innocent animals should be harmed. Drug addicts kill themselves every day taking drugs. They have no problem with drugs that kill. More good candidates.
Wow! You're so dark and gloomy ... can we use you as human poison tester? You probably would not be afraid, right? I mean - being so deliciously subversive and all ... .
Sigh ... I'll never find a real man like that.
/plays with hair and looks to the heavens.
You keep looking for that real man. You should be embarrassed to look at me for your real man, it speaks more to some kind of pathology you have.
If I were in prison, convicted of some henious crime, OR was a drug user, I probably would volunteer. Using innocent animals for experimentation is like using children. They have done nothing wrong. Pick on those that have.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
I am sorry she is ill, but she supports cruelty to animals. I cannot condone that.
scientific experiments are not cruelty. It is how science advances.
as long as there are no other possibilities for the experiments and testing - they will continue, which fells under the expression of necessary evil.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
As long as the prisoners consent.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
Animals are more important than humans - how "liberal" of you.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
There is simply no good reason to prohibit medical experiments on prisoners and drug addicts rather than animals. We don't need more dead animals. We could use a bunch fewer of criminals and druggies.
You are only pathological if you think I'm a real man and a real man is what you are looking for.
As long as the prisoners consent.