GreenBean
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2013
- 5,407
- 616
- 155
This in reality should be a very short thread. The idea is basically that one should tolerate unpopular opinions from people because they have the right to those opinions. Well yes they do, but we as society have the right to react to those opinions in a manner of ways we so see fit. We can send in letters, emails for the more hip, Call, Boycott and even demand someone if fired.
The company ( we will use Phil from ducks as the leading example.) has the right to ignore such demands from the public. They also have the right to watch their bottom line and if they feel such words will result in them loosing money. They can remove said person from their business.
Now some think ( well one really) that such ACTIONS as calling for a firing should be made criminal. Now to any logical person that should be a red flag. You can not claim someone has the unalienable right to voice their opinion, and then in the next breath say that a group voicing there opinion/actions as a criminal offense.
Speaking out against the crown at one point was also illegal, and yet i highly doubt that would be seen as "evil" by some people. In fact i assume those types would have supported such Evil actions.
Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing and you need to take the good with the bad. Sometimes that bad has consequences such as boycotts and the call to fire someone.
I'm not going to get into the partisan left vs right and who doesn't like consequences, because the reality is nobody likes them. Nobody wants to be personally accountable for their actions and always wants to pass the buck to whomever than can. The reality is this is a dumb partisan trick in order to play victim/divert the subject.
I guess there isnt really much to debate, because there really isnt anything to debate on this subject to logical people. Granted who cares where this subject goes, freedom of speech and the flow of conversation is the greatest thing in this world to have.
Tolerance is merely a guise under which the Gay Agenda seeks to infiltrate and manipulate school curriculum as well as Media venues to suit their perverted needs.
Los Angeles Public Schools under Gay Superintendent John Deasy who replaced Gay Superintendent Ramon Cortines in 2011 has been actively and openly campaigning for the Gay agenda in Schools. Meanwhile LA School ..where only 55-56% of students ever graduate. Over 17,000 eighth-graders drop out of school ...Yet the most important and foremost issue on this clowns agenda is the Gay Agenda.
In October 2013 the Daily Caller reported that the 'LA public schools are encouraging teachers and staff to wear badges that identify them as LGBT allies and supporters of the pro-gay movement.' The District states that the badges ' will help teachers celebrate the fabulousness of gay students, gay fellow teachers, and other gays, whose gayness automatically merits universal applause and celebration..'
Teachers who fail to adhere to the gay agenda are routinely chastised harassed, fired or forced to resign , as is evidenced by the case of Manuel Fernandez, a special education teacher in the Los Angeles School District. [Teacher Files Suit, Says He Was Forced to Quit For Not Supporting Gay Agenda]
Gay Agenda in Public Schools