To what degree is it appropriate for a sitting president to deprecate a SCOTUS decision?

[BackAgain]

Nonsense
Nobody is afraid of your guns

The biggest defense against Government Tyranny is a Free Press, Freedom of Speech and the vote

All being attacked by Conservatives

Bullshit. Free speech and freedom of the press are attacked entirely by the liberal Democrats.

 

[scruffy]

The Supreme Court is the enemy of the people.

Now THIS ^^^ is just about the stupidest thing I've heard all day

The fact is that the SCOTUS has ignored the Constitution.

Strike two. One more you're headed for the showers.

There is no such thing as a unborn child. A fetus is not a child.

Oh well....

 

[scruffy]

Free will asshole. The God given right of Free Will.

Wait... wait... time out.

Did I just hear a leftie invoke the name of God?

WTF? Did I wake up in the Twilight Zone?

 

[Leo123]

Free will asshole. The God given right of Free Will.

Murderers have 'free will' too. Stop polluting the language....asshole.

 

[Leo123]

Wait... wait... time out.

Did I just hear a leftie invoke the name of God?

WTF? Did I wake up in the Twilight Zone?

Loony leftists practice relative morality. They have no problem invoking the name of God if it serves their political purpose. Morals are fluid to them.

 

[rightwinger]

Bullshit. Free speech and freedom of the press are attacked entirely by the liberal Democrats.

Nice try Skippy

It is Republicans who have been attacking the integrity and trust in a Free Press and our voting process

The cornerstones of our Democracy

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong. We’ve needed it since before the Constitution got ratified.

OK

Show me where in over 200 years the Second Amendment has been used to fight Government tyranny

 

[scruffy]

It is Republicans who have been attacking the integrity and trust in a Free Press and our voting process

You have no voting process, dumbass.

The people of Iraq, with their purple fingers, have a better voting process than you do.

 

[JohnDB]

We have THREE branches of Government.

None are supremely in charge. All are equal.
It was set up this way by the framers of the constitution. It doesn't matter if the President doesn't like it....TFB.

Here's what has to happen....Congress has to have a constitutional convention and then the president will have to sign off on it too.

Then the Supreme Court will support the law.

Until then....nothing happens.

And just for the record.....the ERA to the constitution still is not ratified. It's not Law. It's not a part of the constitution.

 

[rightwinger]

You have no voting process, dumbass.

The people of Iraq, with their purple fingers, have a better voting process than you do.

Another example of Conservatives attacking our voting process

The most secure in the world

 

[SeaMajor7]

Another example of Conservatives attacking our voting process

The most secure in the world

Thousands of unfolded mail in ballots that were counted agree.

 

[rightwinger]

We have THREE branches of Government.

None are supremely in charge. All are equal.
It was set up this way by the framers of the constitution. It doesn't matter if the President doesn't like it....TFB.

Here's what has to happen....Congress has to have a constitutional convention and then the president will have to sign off on it too.

Then the Supreme Court will support the law.

Until then....nothing happens.

And just for the record.....the ERA to the constitution still is not ratified. It's not Law. It's not a part of the constitution.

In theory, yes

In practice, Congress is gridlocked and incapable of making basic decisions

With a gridlocked Congress, a Presidents executive powers are limited

The Supreme Court has no restriction on what rights they can trample on.

 

[rightwinger]

Thousands of unfolded mail in ballots that were counted agree.

Another stolen election fantasy
EVERY mail in ballot is linked to a registered voter

 

[BackAgain]

Nice try Skippy

It is Republicans who have been attacking the integrity and trust in a Free Press and our voting process

The cornerstones of our Democracy

Attacking dishonest reporting isn’t an attack on freedom of the press, you absolute twat. And Dumbocraps have also attacked elections and alleged fraud. Don’t lie on top of everything else, Leftwhiner.

 

[BackAgain]

OK

Show me where in over 200 years the Second Amendment has been used to fight Government tyranny

No. I will again just remind you that the people demanded the bill of rights. So without the 2d amendment, we would have had no Constitution ratified. Thus, the 2d Amendment been necessary to the Constitution and to our Republic since before ratification.

 

[Flash]

Biden was pretty harsh this afternoon as his condemned the conservative justices and called it a “sad day for the country*” and the ruling a “tragic error.” He even went so far as to claim that the justices “took away a Constitutional right” when of course there is no constitutional right to an abortion and was the crux of what the SCOTUS determined.

Is it not undermining a co-equal branch of the government for a president to say that the SCOTUS has violated the Constitution?

* It‘s not a sad day for million of yet unborn children.

Biden blasts Supreme Court's abortion decision: 'This is not over'

President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court is leading the country on a dangerous path.

www.freep.com

Biden is a friggin dufus so does anyone really care what he says? Just the babblings of a senile old man with a low IQ and a hateful disposition.

After the mid terms and Republicans take over Congress he will be a lame duck anyway.

 

[rightwinger]

Attacking dishonest reporting isn’t an attack on freedom of the press, you absolute twat. And Dumbocraps have also attacked elections and alleged fraud. Don’t lie on top of everything else, Leftwhiner.

Very true

Attacking dishonest reporting by providing credible facts is acceptable
Attacking news you don’t like as “fake news” with no facts is deceptive

 

[rightwinger]

No. I will again just remind you that the people demanded the bill of rights. So without the 2d amendment, we would have had no Constitution ratified. Thus, the 2d Amendment been necessary to the Constitution and to our Republic since before ratification.

Interesting spin on history

Can you show which “people” refused to ratify the Constitution without a 2nd amendment?

 

[JohnDB]

In theory, yes

In practice, Congress is gridlocked and incapable of making basic decisions

With a gridlocked Congress, a Presidents executive powers are limited

The Supreme Court has no restriction on what rights they can trample on.

But it's ineffective....congress holds the purse strings.
Unfunded Federal Mandates are just that...unfunded and DOA.
The individual states must fund these things and it's been extremely obvious that some states do not sufficiently fund SCOTUS directives.
The BrianA settlement is a prime example.

TN and Florida have never fully funded this mandate and the Children have suffered for it. Just about any state is much much better to foster children than these two....they both fight for last place in quality of care in the Foster Care System and are extremely quick to place children in it.
They need an overhaul of the system but the head of the agency is always a political appointee. Meaning they are doomed to remain in last place.

Two of the three branches must work in concert to get anything done. Meaning that it must be "We the people " that actually do anything. It's not lightning quick...never was supposed to be. But look at what happened after 9-11....We found out who it was and how they did it and the planes flew and bombs dropped and some soldiers went on a manhunt. And their organization is gone. Nothing left but ashes in the wind in the desert.

We can act quickly...but we have to be united.

 

[hadit]

Republicans ask about guns

Should they?