Okey let me give you a serious response.
I’m not against anyone getting the vaccine. If you want it, get it. I think it’s even wise for elderly to get it.
However, here is my take on forcing the entire country to get it. This is an experimental mRNA type vaccine, of which there are NO long term studies in humans done. Do you think it is wise for an entire nation to be inoculated with an experimental vaccine which we have no idea what the long term repercussions will be?
What if it turns out in a few years whose who are vaccinated have their immune systems compromised? Or if they have heart issues? Or blood clot issues? What happens if a big percentage of them die from these issues? How will our country survive if 90% of the population is inoculated with the same vaccine that ends up killing most of them? It may be a “conspiracy theory” to think of these things, but these theories certainly cannot be debunked by scientific studies because none have been done.
I don’t know about you, but I think that’s a huge gamble, to gamble the entire future of this nation on one experimental vaccine. So pardon me if I think it’s irresponsible to push it onto 90%+ of the population. I think it would be smarter to have different types of vaccines, and even a portion of unvaccinated. Personally I was holding out for the J&J vaccine, but then the early reports were even worse than the mRNA ones and it was pulled, so I scratched that one off the list.
I am not “anti-vax”. Trust me, I would take a safe and effective vaccine against that CCP/Fauci spawned poison from Wuhan. I don’t want to catch that shit. But at this point I would rather get the virus and build up natural immunity to the future variants. Scientific studies so far have proven that natural immunity is more effective than vaccines.
I’m not “anti-science”. I read scientific papers on the virus and the vaccines. I watch videos about them, I try to educate myself in every way on the subject. Whenever I talk to my relatives about it, they are all clueless on the actual science, and they are all Vaxxed. Science is about doubting. Science is questioning. Science is about observation and testing. That’s all we are doing, is asking questions. What are the long term effects? No one has an answer. So I will wait until the science shows us the answers, then I will get vaccinated.
Don't you idiots ever do any independent research?
Hawk, you are wrong across the board.
"
Nucleic acid therapeutics have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional vaccine approaches.
The first report of the successful use of in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA in animals was published in 1990, when reporter gene mRNAs were injected into mice and protein production was detected5. A subsequent study in 1992 demonstrated that administration of vasopressin-encoding mRNA in the hypothalamus could elicit a physiological response in rats6. However, these early promising results did not lead to substantial investment in developing mRNA therapeutics, largely owing to concerns associated with mRNA instability, high innate immunogenicity and inefficient
in vivo delivery. Instead, the field pursued DNA-based and protein-based therapeutic approaches
7,
8.
Over the past decade, major technological innovation and research investment have enabled mRNA to become a promising therapeutic tool in the fields of vaccine development and protein replacement therapy. The use of mRNA has several beneficial features over subunit, killed and live attenuated virus, as well as DNA-based vaccines. First, safety: as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform, there is no potential risk of infection or insertional mutagenesis. Additionally, mRNA is degraded by normal cellular processes, and its
in vivo half-life can be regulated through the use of various modifications and delivery methods
9,
10,
11,
12. The inherent immunogenicity of the mRNA can be down-modulated to further increase the safety profile
9,
12,
13. Second, efficacy: various modifications make mRNA more stable and highly translatable
9,
12,
13. Efficient
in vivo delivery can be achieved by formulating mRNA into carrier molecules, allowing rapid uptake and expression in the cytoplasm (reviewed in Refs
10,
11). mRNA is the minimal genetic vector; therefore, anti-vector immunity is avoided, and mRNA vaccines can be administered repeatedly. Third, production: mRNA vaccines have the potential for rapid, inexpensive and scalable manufacturing, mainly owing to the high yields of
in vitro transcription reactions.""""
The mRNA vaccine field is developing extremely rapidly; a large body of preclinical data has accumulated over the past several years, and multiple human clinical trials have been initiated. In this Review, we discuss current mRNA vaccine approaches, summarize the latest findings, highlight challenges and recent successes, and offer perspectives on the future of mRNA vaccines. The data suggest that mRNA vaccines have the potential to solve many of the challenges in vaccine development for both infectious diseases and cancer."""
mRNA vaccines represent a promising alternative to conventional vaccine approaches, but their application has been hampered by instability and delivery issues. Here, Pardi and colleagues discuss recent advances in mRNA vaccine technology, assess mRNA vaccines currently in development for cancer...
www.nature.com
Also, SARS vaccine research has been underway since 2003 after the SARS virus outbreak in Asia. COVID-19 is a SARS virus.
I bet as a kid you got the Measles/Mumps/Rubella vax, right? So did everybody else.
Like Fauci said...If social media were around during the time of polio, we'd still have polio.