To my fellow Trump voters...

[bripat9643]

To be honest, I don't agree with Gorsuch's ruling. .

Yet you defend him anyway.

He ruled based on his understanding of the law. Even the best judges make rulings I don't agree with.

 

[radical right]

If that has no legal import, then how can anything he said during the campaign have any legal import?

You're stepping all over your own dick.

The same way during a murder trial someone telling the victim "i;m gonna kill you" carries legal weight.

 

[radical right]

So we are back to you being a liar

Congrats I guess

Actually Trump tweeted it was a muslim ban.

Are you also claiming Trump never tweeted it?

 

[bripat9643]

If that has no legal import, then how can anything he said during the campaign have any legal import?

You're stepping all over your own dick.

The same way during a murder trial someone telling the victim "i;m gonna kill you" carries legal weight.

Either what he said shows intent or it doesn't. You're arguing that it shows intent in one case but not the other.

Your a special example of the logically impaired.

 

[bripat9643]

So we are back to you being a liar

Congrats I guess

Actually Trump tweeted it was a muslim ban.

Are you also claiming Trump never tweeted it?

He never did any such thing.

 

[radical right]

Either what he said shows intent or it doesn't. You're arguing that it shows intent in one case but not the other.

Now you get it. If you're trying to prove murder, no matter how many times the accused claimed they would never hurt a fly, vs the times they promised to rip out the victims heart and show it to him. Trump was caught sayng his executive order was a muslim ban, and that he intended his eo to be a muslim ban, vs saying his eo wasn't a muslim ban.

 

[radical right]

Actually Trump tweeted it was a muslim ban.

Are you also claiming Trump never tweeted it?

He never did any such thing.

 

[bripat9643]

Either what he said shows intent or it doesn't. You're arguing that it shows intent in one case but not the other.

Now you get it. If you're trying to prove murder, no matter how many times the accused claimed they would never hurt a fly, vs the times they promised to rip out the victims heart and show it to him. Trump was caught sayng his executive order was a muslim ban, and that he intended his eo to be a muslim ban, vs saying his eo wasn't a muslim ban.

You arguing against your own legal theory, moron.

You don't get it.

 

[bripat9643]

Actually Trump tweeted it was a muslim ban.

Are you also claiming Trump never tweeted it?

He never did any such thing.

The first tweet doesn't mention Muslims, and the second tweet was during the campaign before there was any EO. Furthermore, the second one is not a tweet. It's a CNN article.

No cigar, asshole.

 

[radical right]

You arguing against your own legal theory, moron.

You don't get it.

Simply put, one admission of guilt overrides a thousand proclamations of innocence.

 

[bripat9643]

You arguing against your own legal theory, moron.

You don't get it.

Simply put, one admission of guilt overrides a thousand proclamations of innocence.

"Guilt" or "innocence" has nothing to do with this issue.

 

[radical right]

You arguing against your own legal theory, moron.

You don't get it.

Simply put, one admission of guilt overrides a thousand proclamations of innocence.

"Guilt" or "innocence" has nothing to do with this issue.

Then one admission of the eo being a muslim ban, overrides a thousand proclamations of it not being a muslim ban.

 

[bripat9643]

You arguing against your own legal theory, moron.

You don't get it.

Simply put, one admission of guilt overrides a thousand proclamations of innocence.

"Guilt" or "innocence" has nothing to do with this issue.

Then one admission of the eo being a muslim ban, overrides a thousand proclamations of it not being a muslim ban.

EO's don't make "admissions," numskull.

 

[radical right]

Then one admission of the eo being a muslim ban, overrides a thousand proclamations of it not being a muslim ban.

EO's don't make "admissions," numskull.

But Trump, as signer of the eo did. He said it was a muslim ban, and the judge believe him. As I said, one admission of it being a muslim ban, overrules a thousand proclamations it wasn't.

 

[bripat9643]

Then one admission of the eo being a muslim ban, overrides a thousand proclamations of it not being a muslim ban.

EO's don't make "admissions," numskull.

But Trump, as signer of the eo did. He said it was a muslim ban, and the judge believe him. As I said, one admission of it being a muslim ban, overrules a thousand proclamations it wasn't.

No, he most certainly did not say it was a Muslim ban. He said precisely the opposite:

Amid protests and confusion, Trump defends executive order: ‘This is not a Muslim ban’​

 

[radical right]

No, he most certainly did not say it was a Muslim ban. He said precisely the opposite:

Amid protests and confusion, Trump defends executive order: ‘This is not a Muslim ban’​

Rudy Giuliani who helped write it, called it a muslim ban.

Giuliani: Trump asked me how to do a Muslim ban 'legally'

Giuliani: Trump asked me how to do a Muslim ban 'legally'

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said in an interview on Saturday that President Trump had previously asked him about legally implementing a "Muslim ban."

 

[bripat9643]

No, he most certainly did not say it was a Muslim ban. He said precisely the opposite:

Amid protests and confusion, Trump defends executive order: ‘This is not a Muslim ban’​

Rudy Giuliani who helped write it, called it a muslim ban.

Quote him saying that, and then prove he helped write it.

 

[radical right]

Quote him saying that, and then prove he helped write it.

Back up and look at my post again.

 

[LeftofLeft]

....why are some of you upset?

Did you really think that YOU would get everything you wanted and nothing you didn't want?

Do you really think that the POTUS can just do whatever he wants to?

Do you understand that negotiations ALWAYS have to be made?

I am a Trump supporter, just to clarify.

Obama was the President that set the Precedent

 

[radical right]

Quote him saying that, and then prove he helped write it.

Giuliani: Trump asked me how to do a Muslim ban 'legally'

Giuliani: Trump asked me how to do a Muslim ban 'legally'

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R) said in an interview on Saturday that President Trump had previously asked him about legally implementing a "Muslim ban."