Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Fizz]

The agents incompetent efforts to confuse the matter only expose their conspiracy further.

FEMA and the agents misrepresent the elevator guide rail support steel as "core columns".

and have NEVER show the stel core columns in the core area on 9-11.

i told you that you'd try to change the subject!!

answer the ******* post, disinfo agent chris.

WHY DO YOU CONTINUE SHOWING THE OVERLAY PROVEN TO BE INCORRECT???
WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO CLAIM THE SPIRE IS NOT THE CENTER TWO ROWS OF STEEL COLUMNS?

you have NOTHING to back up your claims of "elevator guide rail support" except your own ******* ramblings. there is not one reliable source that says the steel core columns are "elevator guide rail support steel"... ITS SOMETHING YOU MADE UP!!

 

[Liability]

[CriscoFEARa's Unadulterated bullshit snipped]

[BULLSHIT alFUXy img] {snipped} [/BULLSHIT alFUXy img]

[Additional CriscoFEARa unadulterated bullshit snipped]

If one snips the unadulterated (not to mention previously refuted) CriscoFEARa bullshit from his moronic posts, one is left in effect with no posts at all from that unmanly lying piece of Troofer shit!

 

[Christophera]

The infiltrating perpetrators of mass murder would want you to say that because you have no evidence from independent dours OR 9-11 to substanciate your treasonous lie of steel core columns.

9-11-misprision of treason, Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382

To the Honorable Judge of the United States Court.

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382
Before the court is the question involving the true structural design of the Twin Towers of New York City and a gross deception of it within acts of treason.
These Towers were begun in construction in August of 1966 and were the two tallest buildings in the world at the time. They were the first Towers of that height because of the design method using a concrete tubular core resisting flex, eliminating torsion and oscillation in high winds.

On September 11, 2001 two planes targeted the Towers for collision. The fact of assumption of collapse when the two Towers fell to the ground almost identically, at different times, not respective of impact sequence within a few hours, is intrinsically associated with the misrepresentation of the fundamental design of the Towers to official entities providing engineering analysis of collapse, invalidating that analysis.

Included accessory Exhibits and Panels of photographs are for the purpose of substantiating the commission of what these citizens know as misprision of treason.


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

The infiltrating perpetrators of mass murder would want you to say that because you have no evidence from independent dours OR 9-11 to substanciate your treasonous lie of steel core columns.

9-11-misprision of treason, Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382

To the Honorable Judge of the United States Court.

TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382
Before the court is the question involving the true structural design of the Twin Towers of New York City and a gross deception of it within acts of treason.
These Towers were begun in construction in August of 1966 and were the two tallest buildings in the world at the time. They were the first Towers of that height because of the design method using a concrete tubular core resisting flex, eliminating torsion and oscillation in high winds.

On September 11, 2001 two planes targeted the Towers for collision. The fact of assumption of collapse when the two Towers fell to the ground almost identically, at different times, not respective of impact sequence within a few hours, is intrinsically associated with the misrepresentation of the fundamental design of the Towers to official entities providing engineering analysis of collapse, invalidating that analysis.

Included accessory Exhibits and Panels of photographs are for the purpose of substantiating the commission of what these citizens know as misprision of treason.


Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

translation from the disinfo agent's word salad:

if lies keep getting repeated maybe somebody will eventually believe my concrete core hoax.

 

[Liability]

[ Gibberish laden introductory bullshit snipped ]

[BULLSHIT url=http://fuxgoxy] [BULLSHIT 9-11-misprision of treason linked gibberish snipped] [/BULLSHIT url=http://fuxgoxyBULLSHIT]

* * * *


[CriscoFEARa's standard, totally dishonest bullshit paragraph snipped since repeating his deliberate disinformative bullshit is completely unwarranted * * * * ]

One may take note of the fact that snipping the repetitive BULLSHIT out of CriscoFEARa's always dishonest, ball-less, unmanly posts is very space-saving and time-saving and costs the loss of nothing of any actual value!

 

[Christophera]

Agents with nothing worthy to repeat can only complain about the relevant evidence beginning to exposing the secret methods of mass murder.

The Twins had a concrete tubular core structure.

​

A globally published reference identifies a concrete core. Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992. Whic corroborates the Newsweek article about Robertson that identifies a concrete core.

 

[Christophera]

Fizz cannot explain why the top of WTC one fell to the south when 61% of the north shear wall was destroyed by plane impact.

Fizz cannot provide a lin k to the official plans while also refusing to acknowledge the violations of law that deprives the public of plans for public buildings.

No agent can show the supposed steel core columns in the core area on 9-11. Accordingly the agents support the FEMA deception that creates secret methods of mass murder.

 

[Fizz]

Fizz cannot explain why the top of WTC one fell to the south when 61% of the north shear wall was destroyed by plane impact.

you cant explain why you call steel core columns "elevator guide rail support steel" or give any references on where you got that information.

you also cant come up with any documentation for your claim a concrete core was surrounded by steel columns.

you cant come up with any documentation to support the claim you made up that the concrete core was poured 80 feet below the level of construction and you cant explain how once it was poured the workers got the forms back out.

you also cant explain why you can clearly see in this picture that THERE IS NO CONCRETE CORE!!!

so try to change the subject again, jackass, just like you always do when confronted about your claims that make no ******* sense at all....

 

[Christophera]

The fact that the core is empty on 9-11 proves there were no steel core columns. Obviously the elevator guide rails need to be fastened to something so support steel needs to be there.

From the documentary I remembered there was a big emphasis put on the freight elevators being used to move construction materials to the highest possible levels which freed up the cranes to erect steel.

The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 provides this end view from the north.

 

[DiveCon]

The fact that the core is empty on 9-11 proves there were no steel core columns. Obviously the elevator guide rails need to be fastened to something so support steel needs to be there.

From the documentary I remembered there was a big emphasis put on the freight elevators being used to move construction materials to the highest possible levels which freed up the cranes to erect steel.

The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 provides this end view from the north.

again, this dipshit posts a photo showing ONLY steel core columns and a dust cloud and claims concrete, but no steel

 

[Christophera]

The object on the left is obviously NOT the same type structure as the right, which is steel. That you refuse to reasonably admit this fact makes you an agent for secret methods of mass murder, felony and treason.

That you refuse to acknowledge the violation of the FOIL laws of NYS committed by the ex mayor exposes you aiding the concealment of femolny and treason.

 

[DiveCon]

The object on the left is obviously NOT the same type structure as the right, which is steel. That you refuse to reasonably admit this fact makes you an agent for secret methods of mass murder, felony and treason.

That you refuse to acknowledge the violation of the FOIL laws of NYS committed by the ex mayor exposes you aiding the concealment of femolny and treason.

i have logic and reason, that is something you completely lack
your delusions are not real

 

[Fizz]

The fact that the core is empty on 9-11 proves there were no steel core columns. Obviously the elevator guide rails need to be fastened to something so support steel needs to be there.

From the documentary I remembered there was a big emphasis put on the freight elevators being used to move construction materials to the highest possible levels which freed up the cranes to erect steel.

The west concrete core wall of WTC 1 provides this end view from the north.

there's the core columns on 9.11 right there in the picture you just posted, jackass!!

so we are supposed to just take your word for what is in this mysterious documentary? you ******* lie all the time. the picture above is a perfect example. you cant even get the ******* details of a picture right. you cant even get the article from newsweek right. there's no ******* way in the world you are going to get the documentary right.

 

[Christophera]

The column on the right is not inside the core. It is the spire and it is outside the core.

The core area is left of the spire. left of the concrete wall next to it.

Dr. Larsen found evidence of it in his 2007 search. Listen to this .mp3

http://algoxy.com/psych/audio/rl-cb6-27-07pbs.doc_1-2.mp3

 

[DiveCon]

The column on the right is not inside the core. It is the spire and it is outside the core.



The core area is left of the spire. left of the concrete wall next to it.

Dr. Larsen found evidence of it in his 2007 search. Listen to this .mp3

already proven to be WRONG
that spire IS part of the core and it was in the central part of the core

please produce FACTS that rebar over the size of 2.5" has EVER been produced and used ANYWHERE
and no, links you your ******* for profit site are NOT acceptable
and posting photos that do not show what you claim wont work either

 

[Christophera]

These images prove the spire was outside the core. This one shows it west of a concrete wall, the one that was the core wall.

This one locates it at the north end of the west wall.

You were trying to say it was perimeter column last month. Liars are always inconsistent. Agents are always consistently without facts and against facts.

 

[DiveCon]

These images prove the spire was outside the core. This one shows it west of a concrete wall, the one that was the core wall.



This one locates it at the north end of the west wall.



You were trying to say it was perimeter column last month. Liars are always inconsistent. Agents are always consistently without facts and against facts.

i said it MIGHT be, and once i saw proof(posted by fizz) i accepted that proof
unlike the dipshit you are, i can admit to being wrong and adjust my outlook
when are you going to man up and admit you are a total and complete ******* moron

oh, btw, it wasnt LAST month you ******* LIAR

 

[Fizz]

The column on the right is not inside the core. It is the spire and it is outside the core.

BULLSHIT. proof please.

 

[DiveCon]

The column on the right is not inside the core. It is the spire and it is outside the core.

BULLSHIT. proof please.

he'll just post how everyone that doesnt believe his bullshit is an agent again

 

[Fizz]

This one locates it at the north end of the west wall.

YOU ******* LIAR!!!

your superimposed pictures are from two completely different angles!!!! they are useless and you just superimposed the towers anyplace you wanted without lining them up with anything.

YOU PUT THE TOWERS IN THE WRONG PLACE!!!

here is how they ACTUALLY line up with the spire. its the EXACT CENTER of the building, meaning its the center two rows of the STEEL CORE. every time you post a picture of the spire you are proving that the towers had a steel core!!