Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

The perpetrators would like if that is what it said.

"have steel and concrete hull-and-core". Or steel hull and concrete core. The positioning of words is a convention of syntax that is known.

It is verified by another structural engineer certified in 12 states, August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. (see chapter 2.1) who identifies a concrete core.

Then images from 9-11 SHOW the concrete core. The east wall of WTC 1 concrete core toppling inwards.

 

[DiveCon]

<delusional BULLSHIT removed>

you really need to seek out professional help

 

[Christophera]

The perpetrators of mass murder would appreciate you'e said that in helping to keep their methods of murder secret.

The Twin towers had a concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

The perpetrators would like if that is what it said.

"have steel and concrete hull-and-core". Or steel hull and concrete core. The positioning of words is a convention of syntax that is known.

there's no need to interpret, assmunch. its clear to everyone what it says.

you are the only ******* moron that doesnt understand what it says and claims it says the towers had a concrete core.

 

[Christophera]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

And there is massive independently verified evidence showing a concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

And the plans your agent buddies use are fake.

and agents logically will refuse to recognize violations of law by those they serve that enable the deception they support.

Americans realize that something is very wrong.

 

[DiveCon]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

no, what is crystal clear is you are so ******* delusional you don't know WHAT it is you see

 

[Fizz]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

******* liar.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-about-twin-towers-core-443.html#post2416741

 

[Gamolon]

Are you pretending there are planks in front of the interior box columns seen on the left?

No, there is a stain that connects the sloping line of the concrete above and to the right of the interior box column leading to the top of the concrete core base wall. The stain travels on another slope angle towards the outside, left of the interior box column.

It's clearly gypsum planking. Also, there is no "utility hallway". It's an opening where the planking has come off.

 

[Gamolon]

Express elevators don't fit between the skylobby hallway and the supposed concrete core wall per this blueprint that has been marked up. The blue ovals represents the areas Chris thinks the one bank of 12 express elevators where located:

Here is a picture of the skylobby hallway with access doors to the express elevators on the right:

The core is a physical impossibility because of these mistakes Chris has overlooked.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

christococksmoker makes himself look more and more like a short bus rider DAILY...

 

[Christophera]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

******* liar.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-about-twin-towers-core-443.html#post2416741

All of your misrepresentations are shown to be just that. The core is always empty in 9-11 images.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2418466-post6644.html

This is concrete.

 

[DiveCon]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

******* liar.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-about-twin-towers-core-443.html#post2416741

All of your misrepresentations are shown to be just that. The core is always empty in 9-11 images.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2418466-post6644.html

This is concrete.

******* LIAR

 

[Christophera]

Concrete just like the engineer of record said.

Just like the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 describes.

Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. who is certified in 12 states as a structural engineer. He was contacted recently and stated the concrete core is a "design method".

 

[Gamolon]

There is no room for express elevators between the 16' wide skylobby hallway and the core wall the way you have set it up.

It's physically impossible.

 

[Fizz]

What is clear is that you cannot post an image from 9-11 of the Tower core you assert existed,

******* liar.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...n-about-twin-towers-core-443.html#post2416741

All of your misrepresentations are shown to be just that. The core is always empty in 9-11 images.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2418466-post6644.html

text assertions from delusional morons mean nothing. its clear from the pictures you claim are never posted that it is a STEEL CORE.

 

[Fizz]

Concrete just like the engineer of record said.

Just like the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 describes.

Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. who is certified in 12 states as a structural engineer. He was contacted recently and stated the concrete core is a "design method".

HAhahahahahaha!! you still are posting thaat fake email bullshit already proven to be wrong!!!

the > symbols go in front of the original message.... NOT THE REPLY!!!!

HAHAHAHAhahahahahahahaa you are a delusional moron!!

 

[DiveCon]

Concrete just like the engineer of record said.

Just like the Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 describes.

Just like August Domel, Ph.d SE. PE. who is certified in 12 states as a structural engineer. He was contacted recently and stated the concrete core is a "design method".

HAhahahahahaha!! you still are posting thaat fake email bullshit already proven to be wrong!!!

the > symbols go in front of the original message.... NOT THE REPLY!!!!

HAHAHAHAhahahahahahahaa you are a delusional moron!!

he is such a liar
Robertson never said what he claims, neither did the Oxford
and Domel was just WRONG

 

[Christophera]

The email of the poster is in the message, bu you with your agenda will not faithfully use it to determine the email is real.

I simply screenshot it from the message board and now post it.

It agrees with hard evidence from 9-11.

Unlike your position which cannot be evidenced from 9-11 at all.

 

[DiveCon]

The email of the poster is in the message, bu you with your agenda will not faithfully use it to determine the email is real.

I simply screenshot it from the message board and now post it.

It agrees with hard evidence from 9-11.



Unlike your position which cannot be evidenced from 9-11 at all.

the email that poster posted is FAKE, you ******* moronic idiot
what part of that is too hard to understand?

 

[Christophera]

It is completely consistent with all of the independently verified evidence . . , therefore you are fake and the opposite of what you say is most often true.

The only individuals with a motive such as you've failed to define but well exhibit conssitently in your posts are those with an agenda, and are agents.

Traitor

i]Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.[/i]