"Your claim that you can't write one but the Federal government will enforce it fairly is delusional."
Well, no. As I never said that clearly you are the delusional one. i even put the relevent words in boldm underline and italic.
AND YOU STILL REPEAT THE SAME BULLSHIT.
And I could repeat myself that I want states to fix the problem therefore the federal government would play no role whatsoever in its enforcement. Indeed, federal intrusion would be contrary to the point as it would ensure the consolidation of power rather than the reverse.
And, no, I am not going to try and solve a very difficult problem in 50 different localities because you are far to much of an idiot to even understand what it means to have the states address a problem as you cant stop spouting off about the feds. You are the only delusional one here. Try arguing against my actual points rather than demanding I do something that I clearly do not support and have stated as such.
I gave you the reason it should be addressed and why gerrymandering is bad and you could not even address that reality because you are damn well aware your position on this is a strong case of double think. This is a crystal clear indication that you are just another partisan hack. When it is convenient for your chose jersey, ALL core principals go out the window. After all, this is a war kaz and you already admitted you have to throw out those principals in the name of VICTORY.
At least I will not waste any more time on your idiocy.
You're delusional that you support a Constitutional amendment that YOU admit you can't write even a sample of with a clear definition of what you are against and you actually want to walk in and hand that to Democrats. You've lost your fucking mind.
But you are the man without a penis who took my answer to one post and cited it as if it was written to another one and even when called out weren't man enough to admit it was your bad.
I know from your posting history you aren't directly a leftist, but you are totally their useless stooge.
Again, simply say what you are against CLEARLY. What does "Gerrymandering" mean written clearly and consisely so anyone who reads it would understand what you are proposing?
Note other amendments outlaw things, they aren't subjective.
One thing we know is Democrat
dblack isn't going to help you. This benefits Democrats, so he's for it
- Free speech - government cannot restrict it
- The press - government cannot restrict them
- Guns - government cannot infringe on our right to own guns
But how do you define "Gerrymandering?" Is it based on race? How should lines be drawn?
We have clear amendments now and Democrats lie and manipulate the shit out of them. And you want to walk up and hand them an easy one that is totally subjective. There is no way to write it clearly because States are split between blacks and whites. There is no algorithm to define how to draw lines perfectly. Drawing lines is subjective, and you want to hand leftist lawyers and leftist courts an ambiguous amendment. They will kiss you on the mouth for that. As I said, you're not a leftist, you are a leftist stooge
