Time to Restate Zone 1 Rules

[playtime]

Hah... okay... wait, what the fuck did I just read? I'll paraphrase you in clearer blather.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That's not a thing most people do tho.

Alrighty then... pause for existential crisis... yeah I think I get it?

Wait no, do I?? How the hell do you even play that?? ...Okay but like... I'm still down to give it attention when the vibe hits.

Should I reply? Should I ghost? Fuck it — it's allllll gooooood booboo. I'm just out here swinging on the ropes.

I said that I speak blather.

 

[Ropey]

 

[playtime]

View attachment 1257415

 

[Ropey]

Disclaimer: No upvotes were misused in this little tete-a-tete.

 

[Natural Citizen]

That comment is completely unwarranted and can be deemed a threat so please refrain from this type of language.

Guess they can close this thread now?

I think everyone would, or should agree that legitimate antisemitism, much like racism, shouldn't be condoned and normalized in society. At the same time, however, to just routinely and arbitrarily throw the label around and attach it to people as a form of some kind of political and social currency or for leverage in the hope that the arbitrary charge sticks just because they may disagree on matters of foreign policy or any other poliitical issue with regard to Israel or maybe just because you don't like them, also shouldn't be condoned and normalized. OP, unfortunately, is/was notorious for that particular gambit, observably. But there are a few others still around who routinely run that same gambit, and for the same reasons, so that's equally as unfortunate. Bad element, that, and equally as toxic as legitimate instances antisemitism and racism.

That's about all I have to say about it and will leave the thread on that note.

 

[Oddball]

The

Just noticed while flipping through last nights posts which mere made after I hit the sheets that it looks like he got himself thrown in the hole for the comment that he made, which you responded to, there in post #382 about putting one between candycorn's eyes.

Think this is likely to be a long one, since I think he just came off a long one for similar dialogue.

Anyway. Guess they can close this thread now?

Oooopsie!

 

[Rambunctious]

I agree with you there. The Jews who vote Democrat are prioritizing their liberalism over their Judaism, and would sooner put an antisemite in office than a Republican.

Let them hate and you laugh it off... let them do harm to their bodies with hate and anger... you sit back and laugh it off and dig at them once you see their weak spot... That's what I do here for fun...

 

[Natural Citizen]

Oooopsie!

Oughtta know better than that kind of speak...

 

[candycorn]

Let them hate and you laugh it off... let them do harm to their bodies with hate and anger... you sit back and laugh it off and dig at them once you see their weak spot... That's what I do here for fun...

You suck at it worse than she does.

 

[Rambunctious]

You suck at it worse than she does.

You are the one.... I know all of your weak spots.... lol

 

[sparky]

yet you seldom address any facts.

the fact is yet another agenda cloaked in the guise of bigotry Ropey

~S~

 

[Ropey]

the fact is yet another agenda cloaked in the guise of bigotry Ropey

~S~

Sparky, I call 'bullshit' and 'the soft bigotry of agendas' are simply an attempt to make the facts disappear.

Just address data, patterns, and outcomes head-on ...crime stats, integration failures, fertility collapses, welfare dependency rates, polling on attitudes toward Western values, grooming gang scandals, no-go zones, honor violence, FGM, parallel societies. Facts.

You wave 'agenda' and 'bigotry' like a shield instead of engaging any of it, and that's not a rebuttal; it's evasion.

If the numbers, studies, and visible results (from Sweden's crime surge, UK's grooming inquiries, France's banlieues, Germany's migration costs, or Pew/World Values Survey data on cultural incompatibility) are wrong, show the counter-evidence.

Not slogans. Not feelings. Not sneers regarding facts since labeling observable reality 'bigotry' is just a lazy way to protect a failing mindset from scrutiny. The agenda here is simple: notice what’s happening and say so before it gets worse.

Your move... do you have any facts... or just more deflection?

 

[sparky]

Your move... do you have any facts... or just more deflection?

What we have is a 1st Amd issue Ropey, one our government has recently addressed , which if you bothered to read this thread has been posted.

and no, i'm not about to do your homework for you

go 'deflect' someplace else.....

~S~

 

[Ropey]

What we have is a 1st Amd issue Ropey, one our government has recently addressed , which if you bothered to read this thread has been posted.

Calling observable patterns "bigotry" or "agenda" doesn't erase the data.

and no, i'm not about to do your homework for you

Data, mechanisms, and outcomes are what matter for policy and not dissembling from them...

go 'deflect' someplace else.....

~S~

Telling someone to "go deflect someplace else" while refusing to post a single fact is textbook deflection, which is why I asked if you had facts or more deflection.

Evasion is your forte it would seem... while 'Your move' isn't 'do my homework.'

 

[sparky]

If the numbers, studies, and visible results

how much $$$ do lobbyists spend on social media Ropey?

think on it...... it's ain't all that hard....

~S~

 

[Ropey]

how much $$$ do lobbyists spend on social media Ropey?

think on it...... it's ain't all that hard....

It's ain't indeed.

~S~

In the world?

Tighten up s0n.

That's why facts are important.

 

[sparky]

Telling someone to "go deflect someplace else" while refusing to post a single fact is textbook deflection, which is why I asked if you had facts or more deflection.

read what i wrote Ropey

or you're the one deflecting.....

~S~

 

[Ropey]

read what i wrote Ropey

or you're the one deflecting.....

~S~

Of course, I read what you wrote since I responded to the words, if not the intended narrative slice.

So, point out the deflection, pls.

 

[sparky]

Of course, I read what you wrote since I responded to the words, if not the intended narrative slice.

So, point out the deflection, pls.

H.R. 8809

~S~

 

[Ropey]

H.R. 8809

~S~

Point out the deflection, pls.

Are you serious? Can't you contextualize your argument?