Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
You leftards love to lie.
Obama, ex Obama admin officials, Bill and Hillary Clinton, FBI AND CIA leadership, Democrat party officials and congresspersons, and the media are all complicit in a series of treasonous plots including colluding with the Russians to create a fake dossier, and lying to the FISA court in order to spy on trump and his associates, in order to bring down Trump both before he got elected and after. It is more than obvious that our democracy has been hijacked by the left and their puppets.
Yawn, bunch of Leftard hogwash. Rosenstein was appointed by Sessions, and B, Mueller should have never been appointed by Rosenstein due to massive conflict and bias. Mueller was Comey's mentor, and, once Trump refused to hire him as FBI director, Mueller had an ax to grind with Trump.
Exactly, it was a handoff, the district attorney that carried out the raid Mueller couldn't, will now provide Mueller with possible information he would not have been able to acquire otherwise, due to client attorny privilege.Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
But your man is innocent and, therefore, has nothing to worry about!Exactly, it was a handoff, the district attorney that carried out the raid will now provide Mueller with possible information he would not have been able to acquire otherwise due to client attorny privilege.Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
Just another Trumpanzee with about as much brain power as Cadet Bone Spurs himself. Do a little research Dumb Ass. "privileged client attorney documents" doesn't apply in this case. Faux News is turning your brain (and the Cadet's) to mush! Bigly!!!!!
So just remind us were Hillary's attorneys invaded like bank robbers and charged after, or before, they destroyed the 30,000 requested emails, and smashed 12 cellphones to the smitherenes with hammers, like mafia thugs. Or was it after her top secret emails were found on convicted pervert Weiner's laptop? Or did the court not find enough probable cause for evidence tampering and obstruction of justice by Hillary, her attorneys, and her associates? Or perhaps you're a ******* mentally ill Libtard acting like he knows what he's talking about? Ha ha ha.
Show us evidence of guilt and stop your whining. Put up or shut up?But your man is innocent and, therefore, has nothing to worry about!Exactly, it was a handoff, the district attorney that carried out the raid will now provide Mueller with possible information he would not have been able to acquire otherwise due to client attorny privilege.Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
You said so yourself 1000s of times!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaa.....
"Legal warrant" my ass, judge shopped in Leftwing NYC and getting a permission slip to break client attorney privileges and raid a PRESIDENT's personal attorneys offices like thugs, over what? A stupid NDA with a ******* greedy porn star whore? You gotta be kidding me!
I have rethought the situation. At this point, I'm not sure if Mueller didn't drop this bomb for Trump to take his bait and do exactly that, in order to force impeachment proceedings. Now that Mueller and his clowns have hit a brick wall and found absolutely nothing on collusion. Looks like Cohen and Trump were expecting something like this. If the bastards can lie to a FISA Court to spy on Americans they're capable of anything at this point.
So what. It's past obvious that they're not investigating anything in a fair and impartial manner, they're out to get Trump. So, fire them. They work for the Executive branch and he's their boss. They're out to impeach him, anyway. Fire them, step back and see.
They intend to drag this nonsense to November and beyond to INFLUENCE elections. What they are doing is morally and ethically wrong. Not firing him is playing POLITICS. It's Past time to fire this pawn of the left and the never Trumpers.
That makes no sense, dumbass. I didn't say he was guilty....and even then, why would you ask me for evidence? It's Mueller who is conducting the investigation. Duh. You can find him putting Trump's friends in jail, if you are looking for him.
(COMMENT)Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
Well we aren't sure what will happen, considering we have some republican swamp dwellers who also have an ax to grind with Trump, such as McCain and Graham, who are partially in bed with the Dems behind the scenes.
It's getting to a point that if the House and / or Senate are in the hands of a party in opposition to the president, they will move to impeach the president for the duration of their reign. Politicians have truly destroyed our democracy.RE: Time to fire that Democrat ***** puppet Mueller?
※→ toomuchtime_, bodecea, Roudy, theDoctorisIn, et al,
There are several huge actions taken that have emerged in the last week that are raising some serious questions.
• Pursuit of the possible criminal activity.The Supreme Court is disabled and probably afraid to take action on the issues. Certainly, the SCOTUS is very much afraid to weigh in on the implications that could taint the legal system and allow it to be used to take control of the White House. But there is something rotten on the DC. It appears to me that the highest law enforcement and legal offices in the land may be intentionally doing taking actions that they can legally find that they have both the authority and ability to do, without oversight and review. Knowing that they have no morally right to do --- because they could not get access to certain information otherwise. Knowingly exceeding authority for so that one agency (the FBI in a separate investigation) seizes the evidence and then hands it over to the Special Prosecutor.
• Preserving the Confidences and Secrets of a Client.
• Maintaining the Public Trust in the integrity of the legal system.
• Maintaining confidence in the abilities of the legal profession and its insulation from political manipulation.
• Protecting the United States from the otherthrow of the Presidency under the color of law through perfidity of legal manipulation and the cover of an non-feasant Supreme Court.
(COMMENT)Not at all. Mueller referred the issue to Rosenstein who decided not to go to a federal grand jury for a search warrant, but to pick a judge to ask for the warrant.Getting a search warrant on a lawyer requires a tad more than "judge shopping", my friend.
There is the question as to whether or not the actions, as they have unfolded, intentionally damaged the ability of the White House to function properly, and if that, in itself, constitutes a threat to the United States.
There is a question as to whether or not the usefulness of the SCOTUS has outlived its usefulness since it seems unable to resolve some of the most basic issues in the practices being performed.
And it is important to the credibility of the Congress (politicians being more trustworthy than the SCOTUS) has lost even more loyalty in the face of the American People.
Most Respectfully,
R
